A .22 Hornet in a revolver????

Years ago, a friend and I were lying side by side on a hill crest and playing a game of "Whomping Rocks" with our Hornet Contenders. Mine was 10" Bull and his was a Super 14. I noticed that his was so much quieter than mine and the time of flight seemed so much longer on his. The game is to shoot a rock at an unknown distance until it breaks.

I was using reloads with 35 grain Hornady V-Max over H4227 @ 3150fps. Come to find out his gun shot unbelievably small groups! But his velocity was not much over 22 LR speed! I could see very small chips fly off the rock when I shot. I could see the rock move under his impacts, but that game would have lasted years with his ammo!

I wonder how much velocity you lose to the cylinder gap on a revolver?

I don't know how accurate the later Charging Hornet revolvers were, but the first batch (with good brass) were sub 1" at 100 yards. I'm positive Ruger could do it, but only if they really wanted to!

Ivan
 
Maybe a new gun in that caliber will encourage ammo makers to produce more.
 
In the 1950-1960 era "Hy Hunter Guns" in California was the Distributor for "Great Western Single Action Revolvers" which were copies of the Colt Model 1873. Most were blued with fake stag grips. They were offered in several different calibers, one of which was .22 Hornet. I would imagine some of these revolvers are still around.
 
Last edited:
People stop and watch me when I shoot my 10" TC Hornet at the range. It's accuracy is impressive. Blasting cans and bits clay birds at 100 yards with a handgun is impressive. Can even hit golf balls. I doubt that revolver would be as accurate.
 
I can't believe the combination will be much of a market success. But you never know what will fly.
The Ruger Hawkeye .256 single shot went over well. But that was half a lifetime ago. Maybe it is time to try again with a different combination of caliber and firearm design type.

There just doesn't seem to be much love in the general market out there for the 22H. Not that people still aren't loading and shooting it, but it's not a first choice for Varmit and long range .22CF caliber.
Gotta sell a lot of them to keep them in production.

Good luck to them. Anything that keeps the USA firearms industry alive is good.
 
I think a better choice for Ruger would have been one of their New Model Super Blackhawk Hunter models. They have a 7.5" barrel that is machined to take the Ruger scope rings.
The standard weight in .44 Magnum is 52 oz. but I imagine it would increase quite a bit in .22 Hornet chambering. But probably not up to 66 oz. I don't think double action is important. It could probably have been engineered to hold 8 rounds as well. Why the Super Redhawk ?
 
^That doesn’t mean anything without a distance.

This group was shot standing off hand, from around 50 feet (paced off).
This was straight out of the box as it came brand new, with no sight adjusting.

This second group was the same as the first. Unfortunately we didn't have the sand bags along and a very limited supply of ammo, so didn't do any longer range shooting or sight adjusting.

 
Last edited:
Subtract the width of the group from the height, that will tell you how much velocity variation that box of factory ammo has! Just a rough approximation.

I consider that first group a good sign!

Ivan
 
Bad idea.
Besides. What would that combination do that some other cartridge wouldn’t do better?
Muzzle blast and top strap gas cutting would be horrendous.
 
Back
Top