James Bond's Beretta

Does it matter. No, not really.

But for many, finding flaws and inconsistencies in movies can be entertaining.
Not just guns but other things like disappearing props, wardrobe incongruity, time of day changes in a scene….

There are websites dedicated to that subject. Some are funny and some are sad......
 
Funny coincidence. I bought a 418 at a gun show one year. I collect 25 & 32 mostly prewar pistols. Showed it to the girlfriend. She asked “What are you going to do with it?” I replied, put it on your key chain.
At the risk of straying slightly off-topic, perhaps the very smallest .25 is a favorite of mine, the Bernadelli Vest Pocket.
 

Attachments

  • Bernardelli.JPG
    Bernardelli.JPG
    90.6 KB · Views: 14
Sorry but the picture and video are wrong. The gun pictured is a model 318. The give-a-way is the little half moon grip safety. The 418 had a longer grip safety that followed the curvature of the frame. I have both and I think the 318 evolved into the 418 around 1950 but I'm not exactly sure. The 950 tip up model came along in 1950 and both were made until 1959 I think when the 418 was discontinued.
 
The model 318 was redsignated as the 418 in 1937 when a cocking indicator was added to the back of the slide.
 
The model 318 was redsignated as the 418 in 1937 when a cocking indicator was added to the back of the slide.

Sorry not true. I have three 318s, dated 1937, 1942 and 1948, all with cocking indicators. My 418, which has the above redesigned grip safety is dated 1959 which is the highest date I have ever seen on one and has the plastic grips without the sheet metal backing of the 318. The grips were marked "Panther" starting sometime in the early 50s. The 1919 was the first .25 auto and had no cocking indicator and the grips were thin sheet metal. I have one model 1919 but it is poor condition, just a paper weight.
 
I wondered about that "Panther". We had one of those come into my gun pusher's. This was back about '06. But I had never heard of a Beretta panther, and could not find it in any book.
 
I wondered about that "Panther". We had one of those come into my gun pusher's. This was back about '06. But I had never heard of a Beretta panther, and could not find it in any book.

The Panther marking on the grips was marketing not a model number. At some point Beretta started naming their guns to add to the image I guess. The 1934 became the Cougar, the 1935 was named the Puma and the 418 was first called the Bantam and later called the Panther.
 
Does it matter. No, not really.

But for many, finding flaws and inconsistencies in movies can be entertaining.
Not just guns but other things like disappearing props, wardrobe incongruity, time of day changes in a scene….
Like when I observed that Daisy Duke was wearing two different tops in a single continuous car chase!
 
If misidentification of firearms in TV or movies bugs you, never, ever watch British Crime Dramas, the will show a Webley and refer to it as a automatic in the rare 9MM caliber. They have some really good detective dramas, but they know crapola about guns.
 
It may have been in the books, but I remember Bond's pistol being referred to as a "Beretta Belle," which has always stuck with me. Compared to the .25 auto, the 7.65 definitely had a delivery like a "brick through a plate glass window." I wouldn't want to soak up either. Being shot is sort of like gambling. That lone bullet MIGHT do no damage, and then again, it MIGHT end you. All the braggadocio in the world can't change that.
I had a patient once who was shot right in the bridge of his nose with a .38 Special at near contact distance. The bullet passed through the ethmoid sinus, glanced off the base of the cranial vault, deflected slightly to the side and exited just below the occipital lobe lateral to the spine. He was conscious on arrival. He was neurologically intact, and after a CT to determine internal damage, he spent the night in ICU and was discharged the next day. He had a band aid on his nose and another covering the exit slit on his neck. But consider this, he only took ONE hit. Had that person unloaded all 5 or 6 into his face, I suspect he and the graveyard would have had a date-certain.
John Hinckley put a single .22 bullet into each of four men. Reagan to the chest just shy of the heart, Brady to the brain case (became a mewling cat), Delahanty took one to the neck and dropped like a sac, and Thomas McCartney took one WELL-PUBLICIZED hit to the stomach and went down hard. Four bullets from a .22 caliber, sub-2-inch barrel, $50 revolver nearly changed a government. (I wonder how many people know that Hinckley's family was back-slapping buddies with the BUSH family?)
I carry small guns because they're EASY to carry and I'm not planning to save the world. I'm planning to save ME and MINE, and my little Beretta will do that, as will it's big brother the Tomcat, or my Seecamp .32, or even my Kahr P380, or one of my more favorite S&W J-frames such as the M43C.
Another "tale from the ER," Had a young man come in shot through the sternum by a homemade "zip gun" because he was arguing with his extremely attractive girlfriend (who worked at the hospital), so he decided to show her and BANG pumped a slug into his own chest. It was a .22LR of course. We spend a good while doing the usual chest compressions before calling it. Don't EVER GET IT TWISTED! A single .22 Long Rifle slug through the sternum - center mass will END YOU! So will a single .25 ACP slug.
 
It may have been in the books, but I remember Bond's pistol being referred to as a "Beretta Belle," which has always stuck with me
I don't recall Bond ever using the term "Beretta Belle", but in the early books, before he switched over to the automag, Mack Bolan carried a Beretta Brigadier that he had named "Belle", and it was frequently referred to as his "Beretta Belle".
 
Back
Top