The Case for Year‑Round Consistency in Your Carry Gun

Nels32J

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2026
Messages
37
Reaction score
191
City & State/Province
Oregon
A lot of people like to switch their carry gun depending on the season, their outfit, or just because they feel like a change. But there’s a solid argument for not doing that — and for keeping your carry setup the same all year long.

The short version: consistency builds competence, and competence is what matters when everything goes sideways.

When you carry the same gun every day, you build a level of familiarity that you simply can’t get from rotating between platforms. Your draw stroke, your grip, your trigger press, your reloads — all of that becomes second nature. Under stress, you don’t rise to the occasion; you fall back on whatever you’ve practiced the most. If you’re switching guns all the time, you’re splitting that practice across multiple systems, and that slows you down when it counts.

And the weather argument? Honestly, it doesn’t hold up. The threat level doesn’t change because it’s hot outside. Criminals don’t take the summer off. The idea that you need a “winter gun” and a “summer gun” is more about clothing than danger. If your wardrobe changes, your carry method can adapt — holster choice, belt choice, position — but the gun itself doesn’t need to.

The reality is simple:Your defensive tool should be the most predictable part of your setup, not the most variable. Weather patterns don’t change the nature of a violent encounter, and they shouldn’t change the tool you rely on to survive one.

If you want to rotate holsters or adjust how you conceal, go for it. But the gun? Keeping that consistent is one of the easiest ways to keep your skills sharp and your reactions reliable.
 


This is my carry rotation. I change guns based on which pants I'm wearing.

They're both SFA pistols.

I've told this story before.

When I worked for G4S depending on what I was doing on a given night I either drove a Ford Escort or a Jeep. I don't remember what model of Jeep it was but it was a Jeep Jeep it wasn't a station wagon Jeep.

Anyway the control panels on both vehicles were different. I frequently found myself reaching for where the controls were on the Escort when I was in the Jeep and I would find myself reaching for where the given control was in the Jeep when I was in the Escort.

The last job I had working for Allied I was driving a Toyota Tacoma with a push button start. I Absolutely hated that truck but that's a side issue. Anyway the Tacoma had a push button start my car has a keyed ignition. I cannot count the number of times that I would get off work and put my stuff in my little Chevy and get in and sit there for a couple minutes pushing on the ignition lock and wondering why the damn car wasn't starting.

Last thing, when I worked in a factory I started out working on a Strippit Turret Punch. I've worked on Haas lathes, Cincinnati Mills, Haas Mills, and so on.

Regardless of type of machine, regardless of manufacturer. Regardless of control panel type.

Screenshot_20260217_090522_Samsung Internet.webp
The E Stop always looked just like that and it was always in the exact same place, upper left-hand corner of the control panel.

There's lesson there if you look for it
 
I have carried the same type of primary handgun and same caliber for over 5 decades. I will admit, I change up my BUG from time to time.

Usually I change in the fall of the year as deer season approaches and I trade my normal 1911 .45 BUG for an N-frame S&W in .44 spl or .45 Auto-rim, or whatever caliber I am concentrating on that year (half of the deer I 've killed, and all the wild boar have been shot with handguns).

Still 3/4 of the year it is two .45s - sometimes adding a Hide-Out gun when I rarely go to the big city.

Still to each their own, no one is going to get criticism from me whatever they carry!

Riposte
 
53 years ago I find myself in the police academy with an issued #10 and a Colt D/S at home. We are drilled in reloading under time twice at the 25 from loops. Then timed partial reloads with two more. Again and again. Until you could do it with your eyes closed. (Or in the dark) Point taken.

I realized how important it was not to screw up the cylinder rotation under pressure when the poop hit the fan. I gave my father the D/S and bought my first J frame as BUG, off duty.

To this day I still practice this and always load, now from speed strips. And 95% of the time it's been a DeSantis OWB thumb break holster. Never bought another Colt. I do have a Kimber but that rotates the proper way too.
 
One understandable example of weather changing carry methods/guns is colder weather enabling one to employ shoulder holsters because they are wearing more cover garments.

Other than shoulder holster season I stick to the same carry routine.
 
I kinda disagree.

I don’t dispute that it would be better, more effective, to always carry and train with the same gun. I think it would also be more effective to train for an hour or two three times a week or more. No question about it.

But, for most of us, I think, who enjoy gun ownership, we like having a variety of guns and shooting and, often, carrying, a variety of guns. The variety is part of the fun of the hobby.

In the last couple of years, after years of being strictly a revolver guy, I’ve gotten into semiautos. I do like them all to have thumb safeties, so that stays consistent across platforms. But I also think if/when I decide to carry a revolver it would not cause me to slow down much in a self defense encounter.

(I’ll add that I have never had a self defense encounter when carrying a handgun so don’t really know how I would react. I do hope I would react competently. I have been trained, plan to take more training, and I do practice. I also think the odds of my ever needing to defend myself with a handgun are slim, as are the odds of my house burning down, but I do know I’d best be prepared for either possibility. It’s just not my main focus in life.)
 
Before I got the BG2.0, I carried an HK VP9SK. It it was cold enough to wear a heavy coat, I went with the VP9 (and later the VP9L). That was my "rotation" back then. Now I just slip the BG into my pocket, regardless of weather.
 
If rule 1 is “have a gun”, perhaps rule 2 could be “the same gun”, for folks that want to take it there.

Having any computer confers a *vast* change in efficiency. Have a specific computer with specific software improves that another 10%.
 
I agree with this in principle, but I think there are some caveats. My preferred carry gun is a Glock 19 with a TLR7 and RMR-HD and that works pretty well for me the great majority of the time (Tenicor holsters really are all they're cracked up to be). However, there are times where I have to dress in a way that does not work for a larger set up like that and I live in a place where the sight of a gun gets the cops called, so there is room for the Glock 43 in my life.

I'll also admit that I tried to play the aftermarket Glock parts game and was recently reminded about that being a bad idea when I found a crack in my cool, flat, trigger shoe. The OEM part is back in but the G19 is sidelined until I can get it to the range and confirm function. The G43 is too small for a reliably quick draw from under my winter clothes and bulky coat, especially when gloves get involved, so right now the S&W 66 is getting a turn. One pleasant surprise is that I can safely carry it in the large front pocket of my winter coat (something I would not do with a Glock) and get to it quicker than from a holster when everything is zipped up.
 
Good points but I still rotate my "just in case" handgun every few months usually from revolver to semi auto or vice versus along with changing calibers.
I don't just swap firearms though, I also put in range time with whatever I've swapped to in order to refamiliarize myself with it.
But if what you do works for you then stick with it.
 
I carry the same gun, same place same holster 90%+ of the time. I do have a little drop in the pocket and forget for the other 10%. Because it is what is comfortable, Yes Comfortable as well as comforting. BUT, if you want a rotation no skin off my nose, you do you. It is none of my business how well trained you are, what you carry, what ammo you use, where, or have a rotation that you switch 5 times a day. Just be kind enough to return he sentiment. Now with that said I may snicker and roll my eyes. ;) :ROFLMAO:
 
Disagree with OP’s position. Suspect many LEO’s and former LEO’s (and others) will, too.

For example, in my experience LEO’s rarely carry their duty gun off duty. Size is TYPICALLY a major consideration…maybe the overwhelming factor.

In fact, I usually carried a Model 60 off duty instead of my 14 shot semi-auto. I was 99% consistent with strong side belt carry, though.

I am very active and usually will carry a j-frame when involved in strenuous activities but carry an auto loader in other endeavors. Still strong side belt IWB or OWB.

Be safe.
 
I may be in the small minority here, but the idea of carrying on a daily basis is just not for me.
I think of mine as functional art rather than protection. I didn’t grow up with that mindset but I totally understand if other folks did.
For me it would take the hobby to a place I don’t really want to be.
With that said, If I’m hiking in the desert out west with bears and mountain lions and critters around? Definitely worth carrying.
Then it’d be my 4” 629.
 
Variations on a theme since 1990: 95% of the time, a S&W 3913/14/NL or a 6906/04 [or Performance Center Shorty-9] ........ are all basically the same guns, single stacks are 7/8+1, double stacks 12+1. All carried in the same model holsters (s) IWB [ Sparks Summer Special] or OWB [Sherrick ,Ultra-Hi-Ride] at 4 O'clock

Since 1988; sometimes a Beretta 92 Compact or Centurion still DA/SA with the safety or decocker in the same location [FWIW mine are now all Decocker only G-Models] and working the same way., but now 15+1 or 17+1 guns.


Only real exception is "Penn's Woods" carry a 3 or 4" .357 revolver ...... at 4 O'clock
 
Last edited:
I have carried the same pistol for 30 years. But since 30 years have passed since I started carrying the 1911, I find myself looking for an alternative. My exposure to danger in my mid 70s is not what it was in my 30s and my carry can reflect that. I may switch around for a while before I settle in on something new, but there are one heck of a lot of good 9MM handguns on the market today, and the prices are better than they were 10 years ago. A person no longer has to spend seven hundred dollars to get a reliable handgun. I am giving the Ruger Max 9 a try right now, and it may end up being good enough. So far, it has functioned flawlessly.
 
Disagree with OP’s position. Suspect many LEO’s and former LEO’s (and others) will, too.

For example, in my experience LEO’s rarely carry their duty gun off duty. Size is TYPICALLY a major consideration…maybe the overwhelming factor.

In fact, I usually carried a Model 60 off duty instead of my 14 shot semi-auto. I was 99% consistent with strong side belt carry, though.

I am very active and usually will carry a j-frame when involved in strenuous activities but carry an auto loader in other endeavors. Still strong side belt IWB or OWB.

Be safe.
I appreciate your perspective — especially since LEO experience brings a different set of realities to the table. But I think it’s worth noting that the original post- argument is aimed primarily at civilian concealed carriers, not at current badge‑holders or those coming from the dog‑tag side of the house. Civilians operate under different constraints, different training expectations, and different daily environments, so the logic behind year‑round consistency is framed for that audience.

You’re absolutely right that many officers don’t carry their duty gun off‑duty, and size or comfort often drives that choice. But that pattern reflects practicality more than performance optimization. My point isn’t that rotating guns is irresponsible — it’s that every change in platform introduces mechanical and cognitive differences that can matter under stress. Consistency reduces those variables.

Your own example shows this: you kept your carry position consistent, which helps mitigate some of the downsides of switching guns. But a J‑frame and a duty‑size auto are still very different tools, and the skills don’t transfer perfectly between them.

So your experience doesn’t really contradict the original post — it just reflects a different set of priorities. LEOs and military folks often balance concealment and comfort differently than civilians do. The OP is simply arguing that, for the average civilian carrier whose only goal is maximizing performance under duress, fewer variables generally lead to more reliable outcomes.
 
I kinda disagree.
You're entitled to your wrong opinion (I'm kidding.)
I don’t dispute that it would be better, more effective, to always carry and train with the same gun.
It would also be cheaper.
But, for most of us, I think, who enjoy gun ownership, we like having a variety of guns and shooting and, often, carrying, a variety of guns. The variety is part of the fun of the hobby.
I never really got into that aspect of firearms ownership so I don't think I could give a cogent answer.

A good portion of my adult life a firearm was a pain in the butt that the Army required me to carry or HSS required me to carry oo G4S or Allied Universal.

It sucks the fun right out of it
 
Last edited:
Good points but I still rotate my "just in case" handgun every few months usually from revolver to semi auto or vice versus along with changing calibers.
I don't just swap firearms though, I also put in range time with whatever I've swapped to in order to refamiliarize myself with it.
But if what you do works for you then stick with it.
What is your rationale for changing?
 
A good portion of my adult life a firearm was a pain in the butt that the Army required me to carry or HSS required me to carry oo G4S or Allied Universal.

It sucks the fun right out of it
I totally understand
For you, a gun was an essential tool for the job, and the job being one you hoped never to have to carry out.
 
A lot of people like to switch their carry gun depending on the season, their outfit, or just because they feel like a change. But there’s a solid argument for not doing that — and for keeping your carry setup the same all year long.

The short version: consistency builds competence, and competence is what matters when everything goes sideways.

When you carry the same gun every day, you build a level of familiarity that you simply can’t get from rotating between platforms. Your draw stroke, your grip, your trigger press, your reloads — all of that becomes second nature. Under stress, you don’t rise to the occasion; you fall back on whatever you’ve practiced the most. If you’re switching guns all the time, you’re splitting that practice across multiple systems, and that slows you down when it counts.

And the weather argument? Honestly, it doesn’t hold up. The threat level doesn’t change because it’s hot outside. Criminals don’t take the summer off. The idea that you need a “winter gun” and a “summer gun” is more about clothing than danger. If your wardrobe changes, your carry method can adapt — holster choice, belt choice, position — but the gun itself doesn’t need to.

The reality is simple:Your defensive tool should be the most predictable part of your setup, not the most variable. Weather patterns don’t change the nature of a violent encounter, and they shouldn’t change the tool you rely on to survive one.

If you want to rotate holsters or adjust how you conceal, go for it. But the gun? Keeping that consistent is one of the easiest ways to keep your skills sharp and your reactions reliable.

NAH.....Don't agree.......I carry different guns for different reasons on different days.......Am proficient with all and not worried either..............We don't all walk the same path...........Yet, we still get there.
 
I see nothing wrong with switching guns as long as they operate the same way. If your carrying a Colt 1911 for example, than switching to a Glock 17 you might find yourself searching for a safety that isn't there or vice versa, pulling on a trigger that is locked. I carry a DA/SA CZ 9 or .45 generally and the operations the same. I picked up a neat S&W M&P 2.0 .45 and training with it and the different trigger pull showed me how important the DA versus the SA can be.
 
NAH.....Don't agree.......I carry different guns for different reasons on different days.......Am proficient with all and not worried either..............We don't all walk the same path...........Yet, we still get there.
Different paths indeed. I’m just walking the path where my hands know what they’re grabbing before my brain finishes buffering.
 
KISS principle rules IMHO. The older I get the more I believe in this simple rule.

I own several handguns but I carry a stainless J-frame revolver. Every day. I will never change while I still carry. One day age, incompetence, dementia or death will intervene but until then, it's a J-frame.
 
I switch things up all the time. Not a big deal once you have handled firearms long enough. Something odd like a HKP7M8 my throw me a little off but its just because I dont own one and have only shot them a couple times.
 
I agree to a point, but I think as long as you train with whatever you are going to carry, and they aren't too functionally different, it doesn't make enough of a difference to me. I carry my shield 45 in the winter, and ruger sp101 in the summer, and am confident that either would be up to the task if anything were to happen.
 
Back
Top