The 6906 is still VERY relevant today!

Joined
Aug 8, 2014
Messages
589
Reaction score
1,261
City & State/Province
N California Sierras
For the last 6 years,I worked part time at a local gun shop. Because of that, I had affordable access to all of the latest poly framed Micro-9s: Springfield Armory's Hellcat (10/12 rnd), Sig's P365 (10/12 rnd), Glock's 43 (10 rnd), Ruger's Max-9 (10/12 rnd), and S&W's SM&P Shield (7/8 rnd). I carried and shot them all, over the period of the last few years.

Of the whole crop, hands down, I shot the Roger Max-9 best, and it was about as small as any. The Shield was too bad, but for me the Glock 43, and Sig P365 were dismal as far as rapid fire grouping. The Hellcat did have some good days, but had more bad days. All (except the Glock 43) could be carried in a Sticky Holster in the front jeans pocket, though pocket carry is not very comfortable or concealed. ( I have a 10.5 oz Ruger LCP Max .380 (12+1) for pocket carry. Its invisible in the pocket. With that said, all of the above were generally carried in some sort of an OWB pancake style holster, and are very concealable that way.

That brings me to my pet 6906. While only ever so slightly larger than the Max-9 (they fit in the same OWB pancake made for the Max-9), it feels so much more substantial in the hand, and I shoot it twice as well as any of the aforementioned Micro 9s, including the Ruger Max-9. It gives me MUCH more confidence as a defensive weapon. If I was suddenly confronted by a lethal threat, say a knife wielding Goblin in a dark alley, it is absolutely the concealable firearm I would want to use. 13 rounds of Federal 9BPLE 115 grain +P+ would terminate any lethal threat, as they said back in my Army days in the early 1970s, With Extreme Prejudice.

pet 6906.webp
I will admit, that some of this confidence comes from the fact that I have used/carried/shot the 469/669/6906 platform 70-80% of the last 40+ years, since I fired a pre-production sample the S&W rep brought to our PD range in 1982.
 
Last edited:
If I were to carry a compact double stack 9mm, it would be either my 6906 or my 6946. I shoot the DAO marginally better, but either would be fine.

If I were going to carry the 6906, I'd swap out the ambi safety for a left side only safety. While the stainless left side safeties aren't readily available, the black left side only safeties are available on Ebay and other on line sites.
 
I was really surprised by the size comparison between the 6906 and Max-9! The 6906 grip is a bit fatter, and the barrel 1/2" longer than the Max-9. The holster is a high rise, and was made for the Max-9, but fits the 6906 perfectly. The slide protrudes about 1/2" from the bottom, but not an issue as I wear long shirts.

The pair.webpboth over.webpholster.webp
 
Here's a great video where the guy tests Federal 9BPLE 115 grain +P+ in his late model 6906. I was surprised by the velocities it achieved from the 3.5" barrel. Average velocity was about 1350 fps for about 450 ft lbs ME from the little Smith! That's some serious whoop a** from a compact 9mm!

 
The 6906 is a really good size, and while my Sig P365 holds a couple more rounds, and is slightly smaller, than my 6906, the 6906 is a well made, reliable gun that’s just slightly smaller than the ubiquitous Glock 19. Easy to conceal. In fact, I keep my 6906 loaded, in the safe, in a holster, as an option.
 
The only pistol I have ever owned that I have as much confidence in as the 6906 is the Gen 2 Glock 19 I bought as a duty weapon in 1993. In 33 years I have never had a malfunction, even using it later in Competition. I do not shoot it as accurately, however, as the 6906.
 
The 6906 is a great gun. It's a comfortable lightweight compact and it shoots a lot better than my 5906, i even installed a hogue finger grip and it greatly improves the feel and handling. the gun is quite reliable.
 
These 3rd gen Smiths are great shooters with any 9mm ammo I've used, even steel and aluminum cased.
I have a 6906, bought used in 2019 at a LGS as a police trade in. Lots of holster wear, but solid.
Joining it in this family picture is it's first cousin, a 3913 forum purchase, very little wear and carry marks.
The 6906 seems to have been shot a lot, as the DA has a lot of slack. SA is fine, though. I dropped in a 59 hammer and did little bit of fitting of the hammer strut. Now it will thumb cock like it's 2nd gen parents. The 3913 has great DA and SA, and other than adding the Hogue wrap-arounds, has not been changed.
Even though both were built in 1988-89, the 3913 has the round trigger guard and Novak sights, while the 6906 has the older hooked trigger guard and sights.

3913-6906.webp
 
IMHO, the Glock 43 is a '"fail". While I do like Glocks, ever since I shot one of the first Glock 17s to come in in 1982 (on the same PD and same range where I was a rangemaster as when I fired the pre-production 469). In fact, I still have my 1993, Glock 19, Gen 2, that is an awesome piece of kit. It is as dependable as a Sherman Tank.

The 43, however, does nothing particularly well. Bigger (longer and taller) and heavier, than all the other micro 9s, but limited to 10 rounds, instead of the 12-13 rounds of the others. The grip is awful. It feels like a piece of 1x2 wood trim in the hand. I have had two myself, and never could shoot them well at all, certainly not well enough for my EDC. My rapid fire groups were all over the place, because the awkward grip moved around so much in my hand. Three of my friends also had 43s, and they sold them because they also didn't shoot them well.
 
Last edited:
I've had several 3rd gen guns, I think I was up to 12 a one time. When Glocks hit the US market in the late 80s/90s, I was buying nice 3rd gen Smith trade-ins for around $250 or so. It seemed crazy to me that folks were trading in high quality SW 3rd gens for plastic guns.
My only complaint with 3rd gens was the safety that flips "up" instead of down, opposite of 1911s safety.
 
Its funny, the only other pistol I recall that I shot worse the the Glock 43 was a Bulgarian Makarov shooting 1960s vintage Soviet steel case/bullet 9x18. At 7 yards, the group was the size of a pie pan! Great round for the opposition to use! LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: TST
Another 6906 fan here! Just purchased mine late last year. Excellent condition, then found a stash of new/like new OEM S&W 12rd magazines and a new IWB holster (here in classifieds). I've fired almost 100% reliable 400rds since and it was a daily CC until weather warmed up and put it away until fall. Now carrying my 43X. No complaints or reservations concerning this "older" 3rd Gen pistol.

20251206_152715.webp
20251218_163659.webp
 
The 6906 is one of the most under rated pistols. Had one as my first duty gun and like a fool didn't buy it when it was traded off. Regrated it even since. Finally got one. For a 12 rd gun its very concealable and a great shooter.
 
A 3914 was my first carry type semiauto. I went through semiauto transition school with it and it was great. I think I paid 200, for it new. Got it so I could carry it as a backup and off duty. Still carried a model 14 a primary.

Then discovered the P/C guns. No single stacks, but they had the 6906 model. I know it has several names depending on when you bought it, but it still a 6906 design and size. That gun would shoot as good as any target gun. I think when they came out they advertised them as the
most accurate 9mm made. Added a Novak type adjustable rear sight to it, smoothed out the backstrap of the grip, and a taller night sight ( now a red F/O). Snuck it onto my gun card as a 6906. Anyway carried it for over 20 years. Got a 5906DPA for a 4 inch duty gun when 1911s were approved it was added to the list.

That gun is still one of my favorites, I still shoot it well. But I dont carry it for fear of getting in a shooting and loosing it to an evidence room. So I pack a Hellcat with the 1911 type safety. I dont handle guns as much as I used to and I am old so I like having a safety now. I carry owb in a rear cant type holster but its in front of my hip, like an appendix carry. Maybe I will get a regular 6906 and give it a try. I doubt it though as these are still in the safe. OH ,minus the Recon, I let a young guy on the pistol team talk me out of it right before I retired. Never liked the front serrations anyway.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260411_102600_Photos.webp
    Screenshot_20260411_102600_Photos.webp
    163.2 KB
  • Screenshot_20260411_102622_Photos.webp
    Screenshot_20260411_102622_Photos.webp
    157.2 KB
Love my 6906 and still carry it. Just bought a used Shield Plus at a great price and will probably retire the 6906 for range use once I get enough rounds through the Shield.
 
No 6900's , but do have 2 669's . Agree that they are great guns , really a joy to shoot . I have 3 of the s&w 20rd mags , load them all up and it keeps me busy at the range for a little while . Here's my 669 that Guzzitaco did for me , even put his PC cuts in the slide . He didn't have to do any cutting on the slide for the Sig Romeo to fit , the man is an artist .image000000.webp
 
These are my compact 3rd gens. The 6906 is by far my favorite. I think it's likely an Israeli police trade in because of it's import markings. In this picture the CS9 has a 469 single sided safety that I polished. That safety is now on the 6906. I smoothed out and polished the safety lever. With it being that smooth, it is more difficult to operate with the thumb, in the rain, sweaty hands, etc. But I carry my 3rd gens with that lever in the fire position so the lever works fine for me. I was hoping that it would not rust, but it now has rust. I could just polish it again, or cold blue it, but because I only carry a Sig P229 now, I am going to put the ambi safety back on the gun.

6906
20241013_163318.webp

3913 & CS9
yF4VZIk.webp

mtSKzbP.webp
 
Back
Top