gnappi
Member
Practice at distance is one thing, needing a handgun at 15 feet and not crapping your pants is another thingThen you are probably far more skilled than most of us.
Practice at distance is one thing, needing a handgun at 15 feet and not crapping your pants is another thingThen you are probably far more skilled than most of us.
Generally, 15 yards and less.I only practice from 7 yards in with my m and p 340 and 327 pc , I dont see the need to try and hit something 100 yarda away like the honest outlaw. Thses guns are for I. Close encounters. Anyone else practice from longer distances.
I do but I live on 28 acres of woods that joins a national forest. Chance encountersI only practice from 7 yards in with my m and p 340 and 327 pc , I dont see the need to try and hit something 100 yarda away like the honest outlaw. Thses guns are for I. Close encounters. Anyone else practice from longer distances.
Yes Sir!!, at 25yds model 19 and 66 with 2,5" barrel are plenty accurate, l remember shooting a friends 19 2,5 barrel at the range capable of consistent 9 ringo and some 10 with 158gr SWC .357 loads!!!Most of the time 5,7 and 15 yards with my 442 and I do shoot some at 25 yards with my 2 1/2 66-2 and 19-4 also 2/12.
Yes. We had to qualify on a standard range out to 25 yds, with whatever we planned to carry on or off-duty. I prefer a K frame snubbie in my pocket, but I qualified every year with my P-64 as well.In North Carolina law enforcement officers are required to qualify, at least annually, on a state approved course of fire. The current course requires shoot any handgun back to 25 yards. The state does not make exceptions for the type of handgun or barrel length.
When I started in 1979 we shot qualification out to 50 yards. I started with a Model 66-1 with a 2.5 inch barrel. We did OK out to that distance. The trade off was no night qualification then.
I was initially trained by the NC State Highway Patrol (my agency sent agents to three NC SHP Basic Schools). The SHP shot out to 60 yards at that time.
Dicken fired four times from the trash can and missed twice.My comments are not intended to be criticism of the FBI or law enforcement. My comments are just my observations of violent criminals in violent gunfights with law enforcement.
I have recently watched 3 YouTube videos by The FBI Investigates. The videos appear to be a very accurate re-enactment of the events. I watched the Miami shootout, the Hollywood shoot out, and the newer video on the 1997 Richmond bank robbery in Virginia.
I was curious to learn something from events of a gunfight with multiple gun-wielding bad guys. Of course, the events were part of criminal investigation by law enforcement that lead to a shooting with multiple firearms, and killing, of civilians and law enforcement people.
I have multiple take-aways, and questions, after viewing these videos. The biggest standout for me was the apparent lack of target accuracy. Was the inability for those officers to hit an A-zone, C-Zone, a headshot, or the un-armored pelvis area due to the lack of training, their firearm’s performance, or other factors? Some of the distances were extremely close range. Some distances looked like 20 to 30 yards.
The Honest Outlaw has repeatedly shown the accuracy of handguns out to 50 and 100 yards. Was he in a gunfight. NO, but he demonstrated the potential accuracy of the firearm.
The 22-year old, Elishsha Dicken, inside the Indiana mall, fired 10 rounds striking the killer 8 times at a distance of about 40 yards from a 9mm Glock 19. I consider that to be incredibly accurate shooting under an extremely violent few seconds.
Is practicing and training at 7, 12, and 15 yards good enough for an average defense carrying civilian? Is it a good idea to also practice 25 or 30 yards?
The famous 1986 Miami FBI shoot out has been widely publicized and analyzed. And eventually changes were made as result of what they learned. 11 years later, did the FBI in Hollywood and Virgina use any of what was learned from the 1986 FBI Miami shootout?
Hello Brian,Dicken fired four times from the trash can and missed twice.
Then he closed half the distance and fired several more.
Closed half the remaining distance and fired again.
There is reason to believe the two misses were from the longest distance,
There is no way to know.
The gunman reacted to the first shot, he may or may not have been hit. The video was never released.
This is not to disagree with your worthy perspective.
The main reason for the misses is movement.
When you fire you assume the bullet arrives immediately and that the target is stationary.