Me either...A 17-3 is all I can account for...My 8-3/8 Model 17 is a dash 4. I can't speak for no dash versions.
Thanks, I guess the novelty would wear off, I like your quote "a few tears later" a Freudian slip perhaps? I know I've felt something like that when it comes to dearly departed S&W'sIf you ever owned an 8 3/8" S&W you would have found it to be ungainly, in any caliber. Typically the 8 3/8" guns are lower priced than shorter barrels because of this. The longest revolver I still own is a 7 1/2" .38 Officers Model Match that I bought because of the novelty of the 7 1/2" barrel
I have owned two 8 3/8" Model 27s, but specifically for developing loads as close to the original .357 Magnum as in the longest Registered Magnum barrels, the 8 3/4". As soon as I was done I sold the first one, but a few tears later bought a second one for the same purpose. It got sold too when I was done.
Those diamond target stocks likely add more value than the longer barrel.Wondering how unusual this one is and what premium it would carry on top of normal value?
Yep, I like the front sight too.Those diamond target stocks likely add more value than the longer barrel.
I saw one on GB a year ago and bid on it - and I won. It turned out to be an uncommon 17-1 but was not advertised as such. It was not a big fight and bidding ended up at $870. I was very pleased. I can't imagine there are a lot of 17-1's with 8 3/8 .The bible says they were offered in 1958, this one would date to 1960, 17 no dash.
Wondering how unusual this one is and what premium it would carry on top of normal value?
View attachment 895562

I have a standard 17-1 and I believe you are correct. There are very few 8 3/8" 17-1's. Great pick up, and nice job on the custom case.I saw one on GB a year ago and bid on it - and I won. It turned out to be an uncommon 17-1 but was not advertised as such. It was not a big fight and bidding ended up at $870. I was very pleased. I can't imagine there are a lot of 17-1's with 8 3/8 .
I have not been able to find an 8 3/8 box for it stamped model 17, so I put together a custom interior using a factory mahogany box. I prefer the 8 3/8 since it's not very common.
View attachment 895706
My Friend just bought a 617 10 shot w/8 3/8" Barrel. Good looking and shoots great..The bible says they were offered in 1958, this one would date to 1960, 17 no dash.
Wondering how unusual this one is and what premium it would carry on top of normal value?
View attachment 895562
If you ever owned an 8 3/8" S&W you would have found it to be ungainly, in any caliber. Typically the 8 3/8" guns are lower priced than shorter barrels because of this. The longest revolver I still own is a 7 1/2" .38 Officers Model Match that I bought because of the novelty of the 7 1/2" barrel
I have owned two 8 3/8" Model 27s, but specifically for developing loads as close to the original .357 Magnum as in the longest Registered Magnum barrels, the 8 3/4". As soon as I was done I sold the first one, but a few tears later bought a second one for the same purpose. It got sold too when I was done.
I much prefer the 6” versionIf you ever owned an 8 3/8" S&W you would have found it to be ungainly, in any caliber. Typically the 8 3/8" guns are lower priced than shorter barrels because of this. The longest revolver I still own is a 7 1/2" .38 Officers Model Match that I bought because of the novelty of the 7 1/2" barrel
I have owned two 8 3/8" Model 27s, but specifically for developing loads as close to the original .357 Magnum as in the longest Registered Magnum barrels, the 8 3/4". As soon as I was done I sold the first one, but a few tears later bought a second one for the same purpose. It got sold too when I was done.
Well here is an answer that will knock you off your chair. Decades ago a Gun writer tested revolvers in a Ransom rest and he found that 2 inch revolvers outshot 8 inch revolvers because of less barrel vibration except when you put the revolver in the human hand. Longer sight radius, and a heavier gun enabled people to shoot better groups despite the fact that their revolver was actually "less" inherently accurate. Another real life example of Yin and Yang (well almost).My K22 is circa 1948 and has a 6" barrel. I have often wondered if the longer barrel is inherently more accurate. I have a nickel 27-2 with the 8 3/8" barrel and don't find it ungainly at all. To me, it's just longer. A holster for said 27-2 is another matter altogether!![]()
![]()