|
 |

10-09-2011, 11:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Remington Sm. Pistol Primers 1 1/2 & 5 1/2 Inquiry
Ladies and Gents,
A couple of eons ago, during the Great Primer Shortage of 2009 or thereabouts, I was unable to buy my usual primer of choice, Winchester Small Pistol, but I was able to get Remington Small Pistol #1 1/2. They seemed to work fine.
Then, a while ago, and after the Shortage (Winchester having become available), while in Bi-Mart to buy some primers, the store had on sale some Remington Small Pistol primers at a much lower price than the Winchesters. Being the tightwad that I am, I said, "What the heck?", and bought them.
When I got home, I found they were Remington #5 1/2s instead of #1 1/2s. I looked all over the box to make sure that I didn't accidentally buy Magnum primers, and nowhere on the box did it say "Magnum," so I used them. As a matter of fact, I used them all, and they all went "bang," just like the #1 1/2s.
So, my simple inquiry is: What is the difference between #1 1/2s and #5 1/2s? (I couldn't discern any.) And, while we're at it, What is it with Remington and this "1/2" business anyhow?
Since I've used all the primers, this is a moot point. I'm just curious, that's all. (And if no one sees fit to respond, I guess it will be a "mute point" as well!)
Thanks in advance!
Mike
HHC, 17th Combat Aviation Group
Nha Trang Vietnam
1969-1970
|

10-09-2011, 11:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 107
Liked 458 Times in 205 Posts
|
|
Here's an old thread that answers your question. I think you'll recognize the original poster.
Remington 1 1/2 vs. 5 1/2 Small Pistol Primers
|

10-09-2011, 11:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Har! Alzheimer's is setting in early!!!!!!!
Egg on face department.
Mike
|

10-10-2011, 04:22 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,426
Likes: 11,207
Liked 16,068 Times in 7,017 Posts
|
|
I also still want to know what's with the 1/2 thing ???
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|

10-10-2011, 08:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Oregon, the less dry side
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Hey Mike, you gonna shoot league at the Den?
__________________
It's around here somewhere!
|

10-10-2011, 11:38 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 2,007
Liked 11,845 Times in 4,462 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
I also still want to know what's with the 1/2 thing ??? 
|
Goes back a long, long way. My recollection is the original designation of Remington primers was 1, 2, 9, etc, when they were the old mercuric (fulminate of mercury) black powder compound. This changed sometime in the 1920s-1930s when the change was made to the non-mercuric, non-corrosive "Kleanbore" priming compound which is lead styphnate based. The 1/2 was added to distinguish between the two types.
This does not apply to the 5 1/2, as there never was a mercuric size 5 (SP Magnum) primer, but it provides consistancy in the numbering system. Apparently Remington expects reloaders to consult reference materials, like loading manuals, to understand the application of their various primers. Similarly, they added an M, making the 9 1/2M Large Rifle Magnum primer. You are supposed to know, from references, that it is the Large Rifle Magnum primer.
Every loading manual I can think of has a reference section, and lists of various manufacturers primers are identified as to type.
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
|

10-10-2011, 11:57 PM
|
 |
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,845
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,096 Times in 2,672 Posts
|
|
It may not say the 5 1/2 primers are their small pistol magnum primers but that's exactly what they are. They work great with HS-6, HS-7 and W296/H110...
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
|

10-11-2011, 10:46 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,426
Likes: 11,207
Liked 16,068 Times in 7,017 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
Goes back a long, long way. My recollection is the original designation of Remington primers was 1, 2, 9, etc, when they were the old mercuric (fulminate of mercury) black powder compound. This changed sometime in the 1920s-1930s when the change was made to the non-mercuric, non-corrosive "Kleanbore" priming compound which is lead styphnate based. The 1/2 was added to distinguish between the two types.
This does not apply to the 5 1/2, as there never was a mercuric size 5 (SP Magnum) primer, but it provides consistancy in the numbering system. Apparently Remington expects reloaders to consult reference materials, like loading manuals, to understand the application of their various primers. Similarly, they added an M, making the 9 1/2M Large Rifle Magnum primer. You are supposed to know, from references, that it is the Large Rifle Magnum primer.
Every loading manual I can think of has a reference section, and lists of various manufacturers primers are identified as to type.
|
It was only a question regarding the use of 1/2, just seemed odd. Not what the actual primer was used for. Hence the  .
Manuals, reference?? Are those required?
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|

10-11-2011, 10:56 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 107
Liked 458 Times in 205 Posts
|
|
I don't particularly care for Rem primers, and their naming scheme is only part of it.
Winchester has the most sensible naming scheme in my opinion. Pistol or rifle, in large or small, and you can get magnum if you want.
|

10-11-2011, 11:07 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,426
Likes: 11,207
Liked 16,068 Times in 7,017 Posts
|
|
Kinda my thoughts. I never used a Rem primer. No particular reason. Winchester works fine, and during the shortage I went to Wolf and have had no problems, little harder to seat but work well and cheap!
I think 5.5 would look more professional and confuse people more.
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
|

10-11-2011, 11:27 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,541
Likes: 11,733
Liked 11,375 Times in 5,356 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3
I think 5.5 would look more professional and confuse people more. 
|
Excellent!
I happen to be a fan of Remington primers, and I use them by choice in certain calibers (.22 Jet, .32 S&W Long, .222 Remington, and .22 Hornet, for example.) In other calibers, I like them almost as well as Federals.
I particularly like Remington's compact little boxes they use to ship their primers. Just like the good old days. I am a bit more fond of Federal primers for most pistol cartridges that I load, but their gigantic boxes are such a pain to store I now find myself storing Remingtons when I can and using up the Federals as I get them. My exception to that policy is Federal 150s, which I have such good luck with I refuse to buy any other standard large pistol primer unless it is an "emergency."
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|