Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2012, 02:43 PM
KLNC's Avatar
KLNC KLNC is offline
Member
.44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 172
Likes: 8
Liked 70 Times in 24 Posts
Default .44 Special: RNFP or TCFP

Not at all new to reloading, but new at working up loads for .44 Special.

Missouri Bullet Co., my favorite vendor, has 240 gr. bullets in both RNFP and Truncated Cone FP styles. Do you find one or the other more accurate? Or is it just a style preference without any advantage one way or another.

Thanks for any info.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2012, 09:36 PM
JBnTx's Avatar
JBnTx JBnTx is offline
Member
.44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 498
Likes: 515
Liked 517 Times in 219 Posts
Default

I get most all my bullets from Missouri Bullet Co.

I've never tried the TCFP, but I've tried the RNFP with very good results.

However, I like the .44 Elmer K, 240gr SWC better than any of their other .44 bullets.

I think it's probably more of a style thing than any difference in accuracy.
But some guns do like certain bullet styles better.

For something "different" in the .44 special, try a full wadcutter style bullet like these offered by Rim Rock Bullets.

.44 200 gr. DEWC FB per 500 .44 200 gr. DEWC FB [DEWC] - $46.00 : Rim Rock Bullets, Premium Cast Lead Bullets

Very accurate out to 25 yards from my model 29.

Last edited by JBnTx; 03-16-2012 at 09:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2012, 04:54 PM
MMA10mm MMA10mm is offline
Member
.44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 513
Likes: 46
Liked 60 Times in 31 Posts
Default

TomAto, Tomaaaato; PotAto, Potaaaato...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2012, 07:32 PM
PDL's Avatar
PDL PDL is offline
US Veteran
.44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 314
Liked 75 Times in 33 Posts
Default

From what I understand, the TCFP should have better ballistics compared to the RNFP. I usually use them in my revolvers and a couple of semi autos as well. My older semi's stay with the RNFP cause they feed better in them.
__________________
Pete.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-19-2012, 05:51 AM
Forrest r Forrest r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 180
Liked 1,661 Times in 691 Posts
Default

HBWC's are the way to go with the 44spl.



They can be seated to different seaing depths to suit the pistol they're being loaded for & they make some of the best hollow points on the planet.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-19-2012, 07:20 AM
gwalchmai gwalchmai is offline
Banned
.44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 509
Likes: 5
Liked 109 Times in 58 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forrest r View Post
HBWC's are the way to go with the 44spl.



They can be seated to different seaing depths to suit the pistol they're being loaded for & they make some of the best hollow points on the planet.

Those are nice, Forrest. Did you cast them yourself?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-19-2012, 10:29 AM
KLNC's Avatar
KLNC KLNC is offline
Member
.44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 172
Likes: 8
Liked 70 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Yes, very nice. Are the HBWCs cast yourself or purchased? What are your loads with these?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-19-2012, 02:27 PM
Forrest r Forrest r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 180
Liked 1,661 Times in 691 Posts
Default

Thank you, I cast them myself, their 220g hbwc. You can see a difference in color from the cast bullets to the sized/lubed bullets. As you can see I’m tumble lubing them, tumble lube/1 grease groove & tumble lube/2 grease groove bullets & sized them to .430.

I’m going to do test loads with the bullets lubed the 3 different ways & set to the 3 different depths and be testing several different target powders, namely:
Bulleye, Clays, WW231, WW452 & Titegroup along with hot loads of Universal clays and an excellent cowboy action powder International Clays.

So far with just feeler test loads for the different powders I’ve gotten some surprisingly good groups of an inch or less for 6 shot groups @50ft. There’s no data for these bullets so I was testing what I thought would be light loads with the different seating depths.

So far 4.8g of Bullseye with the bullet seated/crimped short (1st grease groove) & 5.0g of International Clays with the bullet seated/crimped in the 2nd grease groove were impressive accuracy. A hot load of 5.5g of WW452 with the bullets seated/crimped in the 2nd grease groove produced groups that could be covered with a quarter @50ft. These bullets seem to perform better with a heavy crimp just like their 38 hbwc cousins.

I’m a huge fan of the 44spl & have owned/shot them for years. The 44spl seems to do best with bullets in the 180g to 220g weight range. I’ve shot heavier bullets in them but the bullet speeds really drop off with the heavier 240g/240g+ bullets. One of my favorite loads for the 44spl is a 180g WC (Lyman 429348) & 6.5g of Universal Clays or the same bullet with 4.8g of WW231.



I tell you what I don’t get is why Rim Rock Kid would be selling their 200g dewc bullets with a BHN of 15. That’s an extremely hard bullet to try to produce target velocity loads with.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-19-2012, 02:47 PM
TSQUARED TSQUARED is offline
Member
.44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 2
Liked 116 Times in 85 Posts
Default

I have use the 245 gr. Keith style LSWC and a 185 gr LWC both from Lyman molds whose numbers I have forgotten. Both are very accurate and the 185 gr. makes a very low recoil load.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-19-2012, 02:58 PM
KLNC's Avatar
KLNC KLNC is offline
Member
.44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP .44 Special:  RNFP or TCFP  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 172
Likes: 8
Liked 70 Times in 24 Posts
Default

I agree about the Rim Rocks. Another poster referred to them and I checked them out, but 15 is too hard for the target loads I generally shoot. They should have them in 10 or 12 in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bullseye, universal, wadcutter


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
38 Spl - Data for Titegroup & 105gr TCFP bullets rakysk Reloading 4 12-02-2013 02:37 AM
140 gr tcfp load data? trksddwn Reloading 0 10-20-2012 08:16 PM
45 acp load with 225 gr. TCFP H Richard Reloading 15 03-14-2011 11:44 AM
TCFP vs RNFP lead bullets advantages or disadvantages? Rule3 Reloading 14 06-20-2010 12:19 PM
38 Special, 158 RNFP, 3.5gns of Bullseye walnutred Reloading 24 02-20-2009 11:11 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)