W231 load for .38 158gr SWCHP?

Triggernosis

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
1,296
Reaction score
839
Location
Wilson, NC
Just trying to get an idea of what kinds of loads other folks are using for a .38 Spec. 158 SWCHP with W-231 powder.
I'm currently using 4.2 grains. Just wondering how hot/cool this load is compared to others.
 
Register to hide this ad
I also usually use 4.0 of W231 for decent target loads. That's with 158 lead, either TC or SWC.
 
Just wondering how hot/cool this load is compared to others.
__________________

In a 4" bbl, gives a power factor aobut 115. This is good enough for the new IDPA/SSP criterion, but it is below minor for USPSA, and a touch low for ICORE.

If you've just plinking and don't have to make any power factor, then who cares?
 
Hope to see some good load data on this one. I cast my own from an old Ideal/Lyman mould #358429 (Keith's bullet).

I'm hoping to work up a good carry load with them. I use to find casting my own a fun hobby. Now days, it's a necessity more or less and using them for plinking/target work ain' t in the picture.

Thanks,

Murphy2000
 
You mention that the bullet is a L HP. So are you more concerned with a self defense or just target/plinking??

Not saying it's "hot" but 4.2 is actually above the Hodgdons load data max.

I usually use 4.0'ish:)

If you want SD loads then there are better powders for that.
 
You mention that the bullet is a L HP. So are you more concerned with a self defense or just target/plinking??
Mainly plinking and kickin' around in the woods.
I'd settled on 4.2 simply because that's the load the hits closest to my point of aim with the sights on my 4.75" Cimarron Model P Jr.. I was just wondering how hot it was compared to what others are shooting.
 
Mainly plinking and kickin' around in the woods.
I'd settled on 4.2 simply because that's the load the hits closest to my point of aim with the sights on my 4.75" Cimarron Model P Jr.. I was just wondering how hot it was compared to what others are shooting.

With HP 38/W 231 that load is just fine, actually on the "warm" side based on Hodgdons data. But not really as the 38 special for taget is not a barn burner anyway:D

I looked in Lymans Cast manual and it is the same or less.

I stated I use 4'ish as that's what my Lee Disc throws
 
With HP 38/W 231 that load is just fine, actually on the "warm" side based on Hodgdons data. But not really as the 38 special for taget is not a barn burner anyway:D

I looked in Lymans Cast manual and it is the same or less.

I stated I use 4'ish as that's what my Lee Disc throws

With my Lee discs I can get 3.8 or 4.2, so I got an adjustable charge bar. Not that it really made any difference in what I do with my loads (blow holes through paper).
 
I load Speer 158gr LSWCHP's on top of 4.5grs to 4.7 grs of W231. I've used these loads for years and they fall within Speer No.13's current .38 spl +P book loads. Originally the data came from the Free Winchester online data with the 4.7grs listed as +P and the 4.5grs listed as standard pressure. These loads in Winchester cases using WSP primers chrono from my 4" revolvers at Wiunchesters published velocity for Standard (4.5grs) and +P ammo with any of the 158gr lead bullets (solid and HP's).

From my 4" S&W 66 the 4.5gr load ran an average of 822 fps the 4.7gr load averaged 879 fps.
 
Help me out here. Consensus seems to be 4.0 or a little more for a good 158 target load. I am fairly new to reloading, but I have gone to the Hodgdon website for HP-38 which I am using, and pulled up the load recipes. For 158 LSWC it lists 3.1 gr as starting, with 3.7 gr/834 fps as Max. Where do you find a recipe for anything over that-especially as high as 4.5-4.7 gr?
Granted, the 158 load on the chart I am looking at seems to be abnormally low, but this is what the powder manufacturer is putting out. Is it an error?
Any help in understanding this would be appreciated.
Thanks.
 
Help me out here. Consensus seems to be 4.0 or a little more for a good 158 target load. I am fairly new to reloading, but I have gone to the Hodgdon website for HP-38 which I am using, and pulled up the load recipes. For 158 LSWC it lists 3.1 gr as starting, with 3.7 gr/834 fps as Max. Where do you find a recipe for anything over that-especially as high as 4.5-4.7 gr?
Granted, the 158 load on the chart I am looking at seems to be abnormally low, but this is what the powder manufacturer is putting out. Is it an error?
Any help in understanding this would be appreciated.
Thanks.


Look at the pressures. Not only are there no +P loads in the chart you referenced, and the loads and pressures shown are light even or regular .38.

Other manuals show +P lead loads.
Just wondering how hot/cool this load is compared to others.

To answer your original question directly, the HP38/W 231 hard cast lead load that reaches standard pressure max load with the lead bulets I use is 4.4gr.
The 3.7 load cited in Hodgdon is a couple thousand CUP below max. ALways compare the pressure shown in the loading chart to the SAAMI standards. Lead bullet charts may stop below SAAMI max pressure to avoid leading. In that case, get another loading manual to find loads nearer the SAAMI standard max, or +P. Don't guess, and don't start with max +P loads. Be sure you know what bullet it is for.

Thousands of competitors have used a "mild" +P to make minor power (PF 125) with the 158gr bullet, and shot loads around 4.5gr in the tens of thousands in various K and L frames. The reason IDPA dropped their power factor to 105 for Stock Service Revolver is that no standard .38 load makes PF125, and they did want people to have to reload or buy factory +P.

So your 4.2 is within SAAMI specs for a standard .38, if your bullets are the same as mine. "Not too cold, not too hot."

With lead bullets using HP38/W231, you can load usually down near 3gr without sticking the bullet. Don't try that low with jacketed bullets!

Much ado is made about old manuals being different than new manuals. OK, lets use 2 loads from the current 49th edition Lyman manual, which shows for their #358311 160gr bullet, the max load in .38 Special for W231 is 4.9gr giving 16,800CUP for 906fps. Their #358665 158gr bullet recommends 4.0gr W231 for 15,900CUP giving only 837fps.

Big difference.

Why? The bullets are different. Different bullets seal differently and not all lead bullet loads are interchangeable just because the weight is similar.
 
Last edited:
For light range loads I use 3.5 grains. Kills paper just fine. Why waste powder?

I've settled on this for Hornady swaged 158 gr. I've tried as low as 3.2 but found that rather dirty. The highest I've ever loaded 158 gr cast was 3.8 gr and that seemed to shoot very well. I know people load higher but I've never found the need to do so (and since some of my guns are decades old why be any harder on them than necessary).
 
VMI77,
I'm not looking at it now, but if I recall correctly, I got my load data from the Lee manual that showed a do not exceed load of 3.5 gr. of 231.

BTW, from your user name, did you graduate from VMI in '77? I have a good friend and former coworker that graduated from there in '74.
 
Help me out here. Consensus seems to be 4.0 or a little more for a good 158 target load. I am fairly new to reloading, but I have gone to the Hodgdon website for HP-38 which I am using, and pulled up the load recipes. For 158 LSWC it lists 3.1 gr as starting, with 3.7 gr/834 fps as Max. Where do you find a recipe for anything over that-especially as high as 4.5-4.7 gr?
Granted, the 158 load on the chart I am looking at seems to be abnormally low, but this is what the powder manufacturer is putting out. Is it an error?
Any help in understanding this would be appreciated.
Thanks.


You are entirely correct. The current data on the web site is lower 3.1 to 3.7. Consensus does not mean correct. With a powder like HP38 the difference between 3.7 and 4.0 is not a big deal so it is acceptable, but not a practice that should be used with other powders. Stay within the powder or manual values.

Other data listed is from older manuals and different tests. Even though it is the same powder, all the variables can change. Different lot of powder, different test conditions, better testing equipment etc.

Published data by the powder companies is proven safe so if you stay within that data you are good to go. A slight change in bullet type and seating depth can make a big difference in pressure.
 
I loaded a bunch of .38x158 with 4.6 gr W231 back before Hodgdon got the Winchester distributorship and rationalized the brands.
I think my present lot of HP38 is a bit hotter and 4.3 gr is about factory equivalent.

And if you are loading hollowpoints, don't you want full power?

Speer thinks 4.4 is ok at standard pressure, no +P shown for their swaged bullets.
Lyman has a wide range of loads in that weight range, depending on seating depth and bearing surface.
 
Last edited:
My go to load in .38spl with 158gr lswc is 4.2gr of W-231, this shoots very well in my S&W m 36 and m 10-5 the shells extract easily. I have loaded 4.4gr of 231 for the m 10 and it shoots very well.
My other favorite load with this bullet is 6.0gr of AA#5.
 
My favorite .38 Special load is 4.0gr W231 under a 158gr LSWC bullet. When I'm loading 158gr LSWC/HP ammo I switch over to HS-6 to increase the velocity so the HP bullet will expand more reliably.
 
I use 4.0 grains. Nice plinking load in the k frames..not as much in lightweight j frame..try WST instead of 231. it burns a little cleaner with lead bullets
 

Latest posts

Back
Top