Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-25-2014, 04:53 PM
Ceapea's Avatar
Ceapea Ceapea is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 742
Likes: 460
Liked 248 Times in 127 Posts
Default Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?

I am not all that recoil sensitive. For the most part. I don't shoot safari/elephant rifles and X frame hand guns. Both the 30-06 and 44 mag are at the top of my list of owned firearms. That said, while I haven't found my bolt action 30-06 to be harsh (I have shot as many as 80 full power rounds in a 3 hour time span, with nary a concern), I find that sighting in that same bolt, and my Garand, to be punishing from a rest.

Now to the reloading portion, to keep this on topic.
I recently loaded up some of what Remington calls their "managed recoil" loads for some cowboy service rifle matches. Those being 125gr 30 cal bullets at about 2660 fps. I was very pleasantly surprised that they shot to point of aim (of my full power 30-06 at 100yds POA) with a much reduced felt recoil. While standing. They grouped really well too, about 1.25" consistently.
These groups were from a rest, of course. But, the recoil while on the rest was again, mildly offensive. Seeming much worse than while standing.
I am new(ish) to high power rifle shooting, and find this interesting at least. Maybe it has been a "known" for some time.
I figure that it must have something to do body position, lack of a fairly firm grip of the entire rifle while shooting, as well as other things too.

If you really want some nice, easy and relaxing shooting of your high power rifle, or to introduce a new or young shooter, try some of these reduced loads. They're great.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:15 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,164
Likes: 3,638
Liked 5,215 Times in 2,176 Posts
Default

Yes, loading a 30-06 down to 30-30 level is less punch to the shoulder and is fine out to about 150yd, where the parabola starts to droop.

And yes, shooting a rifle from a rest often produces the max recoil sensation, which has been known for a couple hundred years at least.
Another factor besides those you mentioned is the psychological one, since you have little else to think about at the bench, but recoil never enters your mind when the target is game.
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:18 PM
Nemo288's Avatar
Nemo288 Nemo288 is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Badgerland
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 559
Liked 1,501 Times in 789 Posts
Default

The punishment your shoulder takes from rifle fire increases as your
body resists movement (like a shock absorber).
Ask the prone shooters.
I shoot a 444 and even though it weighs 7.5 pounds it is a bear on the bench.
Standing not so much. Part of the problem is a terrible stock design.
I got a Hi-Viz 1" slip-on buttpad and it is now WAY more comfortable.

Likewise, I have concocted a lower power load for the 444:
21 gr VV N105, fill to the top with Pufflon, insert a 240 gr jacketed 44 bullet. Lee crimp.
This duplicates 44 magnum performance in a rifle.
Very nice in the 444.
This powder burns much cleaner than Unique and 2400 which I also tested.

===
Nemo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:18 PM
ImprovedModel56Fan ImprovedModel56Fan is online now
US Veteran
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,356
Likes: 7,577
Liked 5,599 Times in 2,568 Posts
Default

Yeah, I'm told that it's more or less a law of physics. When you are standing, your body gives more. Usually a seated position says your shoulder ain't going anywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:18 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,324
Likes: 2,556
Liked 13,350 Times in 4,614 Posts
Default

Yep, sure enough. I won't even put my .35 Whelen custom Mauser on a bench. Offhand, it's a breeze to shoot. From a bench, well, either my fingers or my face are gonna get hurt. It's SO much easier to deal with when your whole body rocks with the recoil. I had a .416 Rigby that would rock your world but was still not insane as long as you shot it offhand.

***GRJ***
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:19 PM
ironhead7544 ironhead7544 is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bainbridge GA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 1,632
Liked 606 Times in 385 Posts
Default

When you are firing from the standing position, your back is upright. This allows it to give a little bit and adds a bit of your own weight to the rifle. This will reduce the recoil as long as you dont tighten up your back.

On the bench, you are leaning into the rifle and your back doesnt give. With higher recoil rifles, I set up higher with my back straight up. Helps a bit. For really heavy loads, there are standing rests. When the makers are regulating big double rifles that is what they use.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:26 PM
SMSgt's Avatar
SMSgt SMSgt is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,702
Likes: 3,458
Liked 9,413 Times in 3,541 Posts
Default

I think it's largely a matter on mental focus. You can either focus on the deer and never notice the recoil, or you can focus on the paper target--knowing that recoil is coming and expecting it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 07-25-2014, 06:28 PM
Waywatcher's Avatar
Waywatcher Waywatcher is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1,457
Liked 1,489 Times in 570 Posts
Default

I went from a 7.5lb .30-06 to an 8.5lb .270. The increase in weight combined with the lower recoil of the .270 is much more tolerable. I put all the numbers into an online recoil calculator and found the recoil dropped 30% (20ft/lbs to 14ft/lbs). In addition to the lower recoil, the cartridge is flatter shooting. I call that a win-win.

.270 convert here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-25-2014, 06:59 PM
Frank237's Avatar
Frank237 Frank237 is offline
Absent Comrade
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Craig, Montana
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 363
Liked 2,346 Times in 893 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model520Fan View Post
Yeah, I'm told that it's more or less a law of physics. When you are standing, your body gives more. Usually a seated position says your shoulder ain't going anywhere.
What 520 said. He's absolutely correct.

A gunsmith buddy builds BIG guns occasionally and likes to regulate the iron sights for his clients. He recently completed a pair of .505 Gibbs, bolt guns and we shot them off of a standing bench rest. Same sort of affair the British smiths have used for years to regulate double rifles.

A small bench rest ,but 4 1/2 feet off the ground. I've shot hundreds of rds of 300 gr .375 H&H off a standard sit down bench. The standing rest REALLY helps with recoil. Allows your body to bend back,versus taking it all in the shoulder.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 07-25-2014, 07:13 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

As noted, off the bench, just unnatural. Your body id more rigid & position closer to prone than sitting or standing. Things you can do to minimize bench recoil:
Get a shorter seat, so you can sit up & raise the rifle so you can shoot upright. This allows your body to rock with the recoil.
Use a sissy pad. The recoil reducing shields that you slip on. This takes a lot of the slap out & gives the rifle pad something to grab onto so the butt doesn't slip. I have done 30rds from my 404 Jeffery this way with no significant wear on my shoulder. The big boomers require you hold the forend as well, not a terrible idea with a light wt 06 either.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-25-2014, 08:04 PM
crsides crsides is offline
US Veteran
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,885 Times in 1,986 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waywatcher View Post
I went from a 7.5lb .30-06 to an 8.5lb .270. The increase in weight combined with the lower recoil of the .270 is much more tolerable. I put all the numbers into an online recoil calculator and found the recoil dropped 30% (20ft/lbs to 14ft/lbs). In addition to the lower recoil, the cartridge is flatter shooting. I call that a win-win.

.270 convert here.
And that is precisely why my once Mod 70 30-06 now say 25-06 on the bbl.


Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-25-2014, 09:59 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crsides View Post
And that is precisely why my once Mod 70 30-06 now say 25-06 on the bbl.


Charlie
Or a 280, my choice when I built a 7# hunting rig.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-25-2014, 10:09 PM
ChiefStealth's Avatar
ChiefStealth ChiefStealth is offline
US Veteran
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Graham, Wa.
Posts: 447
Likes: 8
Liked 246 Times in 134 Posts
Default

When you are upright, the rifle butt is lower. More toward the front of you arm. There's more soft muscle there. When you lean over more, on the bench, the rifle butt is higher up on the front of the shoulder. Up into the collar bone area. Less soft tissue. More bone. Prone, the rifle butt is closer to the top of the shoulder. Collar bone and top of the arm bone. Ouch.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-25-2014, 10:21 PM
hangnoose hangnoose is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: W coast central Fl
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 1,426
Liked 1,408 Times in 775 Posts
Default SHOOT SOME SLUGS

12 GA SLUGS, from the bench will make you forget all about the 30-06 recoil.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 07-25-2014, 10:43 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,243
Likes: 1,072
Liked 19,273 Times in 9,415 Posts
Default

A Caldwell Lead Sled and several heavy bags of lead shot...all is well.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 07-25-2014, 10:58 PM
RussellD RussellD is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: America
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 17
Liked 775 Times in 378 Posts
Default

When I used to live in Alaska they had a standing rifle rest to help in sighting in heavy caliber rifles. Recoil is much more pronounced shooting off a traditional bench vs. a sitting, kneeling, or standing position
__________________
The American dream is alive
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-25-2014, 11:13 PM
Arik Arik is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 16,601
Likes: 7,342
Liked 17,200 Times in 7,303 Posts
Default

I don't know but recoil is fun. In 3 hours or so I can do about 400 rounds of 7.62 x54 out of a Mosin. Recoil means it's working!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-26-2014, 12:12 AM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,054
Likes: 41,760
Liked 29,326 Times in 13,858 Posts
Default Posture on the bench

When I sit at the bench, my posture sits the gun on a higher part of my shoulder and there are some other differences. Probably the most is allowing your whole body to flex and take the shock when you are tied down to a bench all of that is out of whack. I don't shoot full loads from the bench any more. I have some reduced loads in light lead and jacketed bullets that are crazy fun to shoot. They run from about 1700 fps for the lead to 2400 fps for the jacketed.

PS It doesn't help that my gun is a light Savage and is not a recoil absorber.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"

Last edited by rwsmith; 07-26-2014 at 12:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-26-2014, 12:45 AM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
US Veteran
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,429
Likes: 3,204
Liked 12,804 Times in 5,704 Posts
Default

Factory ammo kicks a lot but reloaded.............

270 130gr BC .435 bullet at only 2700 fps at 400 yards has 1204 ft/lbs of energy.

a 30-06 150gr SP BC .338 Cor-Lok at only 2600 fps at 300 yards has 1309 ft/lbs of energy.

Both kill BIG Nevada Mule deer in their tracks...........and save your shoulder from a beating.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-26-2014, 09:05 AM
hangnoose hangnoose is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: W coast central Fl
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 1,426
Liked 1,408 Times in 775 Posts
Default SLEDS

Hard recoiling rifles in sleds have broken a lot of stocks. I'd be careful, especially if the rifle has good wood.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-26-2014, 01:32 PM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,103
Likes: 10,824
Liked 15,556 Times in 6,816 Posts
Default

At about 45 seconds

Benchrest Shooting Free Recoil - Slow Motion - YouTube
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-26-2014, 02:02 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RussellD View Post
When I used to live in Alaska they had a standing rifle rest to help in sighting in heavy caliber rifles. Recoil is much more pronounced shooting off a traditional bench vs. a sitting, kneeling, or standing position
For really big thumpers, like 458 & up, yes, the standing bench is waaaay easier on the body.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-26-2014, 02:22 PM
NYlakesider's Avatar
NYlakesider NYlakesider is offline
Member
Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe? Wondering...rifle recoil from the "bench" seems more severe?  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern NY-AdirondackMts
Posts: 8,192
Likes: 13,275
Liked 13,702 Times in 5,193 Posts
Default

Not to argue with anyone here but I find that shooting a big boomer from the prone position hits me the hardest. (Much worse than seated bench shooting)

FWIW I’m a big guy and never been considered that recoil sensitive to begin with (No pain no brain I guess)

I did fire a couple rounds off the bench with a .460 Weatherby, the kick was a bit stiff. Gun was owned by my Doctor a renowned plastic surgeon by the name of Brandon Mac cumber that did Safaris in Africa
__________________
14 S&W Revs none with locks!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So whats the deal with "low recoil" or "reduced recoil" buckshot? Ramikrav Ammo 34 12-20-2017 07:31 AM
Springco "Tactical Springs" - S&W "nested" recoil springs armorer951 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 2 01-26-2016 10:31 PM
New Winchester Rifle, "U.S." marked 52D Target Rifle (pics).... canoeguy Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 5 12-30-2013 08:21 PM
Wondering about "the rest of the story." Mule Packer The Lounge 3 08-29-2013 06:28 AM
wondering does S&W make it .357 mag rifle clint_lnl Smith & Wesson Long Guns 1 11-28-2009 10:10 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)