Notice the differences in loads and velocities between Lyman 1967 and Alliant 2000. The higher velocities in the Alliant data is from the SAAMI spec longer test barrels vs the handguns Lyman used. The reduced max powder charges in the Alliant data are due to pressure transducers on the test barrels, some minor changes in powder chemistry plus minimum chambers and bore & groove diameters.
Also, a check of my Hogdon book confirms my load data for HS6 was extrapolated and confirmed by actual firing. Pressure estimation was probably the same way Lyman did in 1967: primer condition/extraction. Federal 100 primer and 5.1 gr HS6= 765 f/s from a 4 inch barrel, 5.5 gr=774 f/s (?????). The 5.1 gr load would probably hit close to factory, I didn't really shoot the lesser loads for accuracy/point of aim.
Dunno about bearing length being significantly different. The OAL of the old Lyman bullet was 0.795 in, bearing surface 0.450 in. SFAIK, Remington never loaded a lead bullet in the .35 Remington, but I'm willing to learn. OTOH, Remington did produce a .38 Spl load way back when with a 200 gr lead bullet. If that's the case, the bullet will probably look a lot like the standard 158 gr lead bullet but with a longer bearing surface to get to 200 grains.