What was the intended use; 223, 308, 50 BMG,or 105mm artillery? When you know the general volume (case size) and velocity of a round you will find other powders use a similar volume to achieve the same results.
Ivan
I just acquired 10 lbs of this powder and I can't seem to find much info on it for reloading. Any info would be great. Thanks
Who knows? Might have "fallen off the back of a truck"? I suspect that a number of things for sale at flea markets "fell off the back of a truck". Lots of things on eBay come from that same source.Where the heck do you even get surplus powder these days?
I haven't even seen reference to such in about 30 years!
Thanks everyone, I found the reference to 700x. I'll try to work something up in 9mm, 40mm, .357, and .380. As for where I fTound this powder, it was in a box at a flee market with a fresh 4lb bottle of Clays and a 1lb bottle of 4831. I thought for $40 for the box I better get it.
Boy HOWDY, I guess!Thanks everyone, I found the reference to 700x. I'll try to work something up in 9mm, 40mm, .357, and .380. As for where I found this powder, it was in a box at a flee market with a fresh 4lb bottle of Clays and a 1lb bottle of 4831. I thought for $40 for the box I better get it.
Not when you get it AND 5 pounds of commercial powder for $40 you can't...Without prior information, one could very easily purchase some pretty expensive fertilizer...
I can see taking that approach from and ABUNDANCE of caution.I don't think I'd use any "flea market" gunpowder, especially if it were in an opened container or of "unknown" origin...
I used NM13 several years ago. I had very good results with Green Dot data which is what the supplier (Jeff Bartlett) recommended. I wish I had more, it metered better than the Alliant flake powders.
Were the "commercial" powders' containers unopened?
Use the 700x data and then compare your chronograph data with the published stuff.
If you are slower, then so is the powder and you can consider moving closer to the Green Dot data.
That is the abundance of caution I would use.
I did some work using CSB-1 in the 44 Special for which there was no data whatsoever.
It behaved somewhat different in that larger case than the 9mm data that was published suggested.
Luckily it is now listed in QuickLoad and I am pleased to see my results are very close to what they predict.
Be slow, safe, and scientific. It's actually more fun that way!