Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2019, 12:26 PM
Babysitr Babysitr is offline
Member
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 2,266
Liked 2,401 Times in 1,015 Posts
Default opinions on .32 S&W Long load

being rather new to reloading I'd like opinions on this load I'm considering...100 gr. Mo. bullet co. coated rnfp over 1.9 gr. Red Dot....federal sm pistol primer, 1.280 oal...love to hear your opinions,Thanks
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 12-09-2019, 12:35 PM
Green Frog Green Frog is online now
Member
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,661
Likes: 1,571
Liked 9,429 Times in 4,226 Posts
Default

Sounds like it's in the range of what I've been seeing posted, although I have to admit I've never felt the urge to load a 32 S&W L with Red Dot... seems like the cans of Bullseye just keep coming to hand.

How about a range report when you get back?

Froggie
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 12-09-2019, 12:47 PM
Sevens Sevens is offline
Member
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,858
Likes: 9,476
Liked 14,862 Times in 5,053 Posts
Default

You asked for opinions so here is mine:

I don’t like Red Dot. I’d rather use something that meters better and if I’m stuck using a bulky flake powder that doesn’t meter well (such as Red Dot) then I would be far more comfortable using it somewhere with a much heavier charge weight. A poor powder dump with Red Dot will affect the load far less at 5+ grains than at 1.9 grains.

Furthermore, a powder that I don’t trust to drop consistently is in my opinion and demonstrated experience is a much bigger liability in a revolver with a flash gap than it is in a pistol barrel.

I use Titegroup and Bullseye in my .32 Long loads and I don’t use Red Dot anywhere at all since I burned the last of it over 12,000 rounds of .45 ACP.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 12-09-2019, 01:05 PM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,590
Likes: 4
Liked 8,935 Times in 4,144 Posts
Default

I bought six like new fairly late model S&Ws (1970s, I think) about ten or so years ago. In the mix were two .32 Long revolvers, a 3" and a 4". One had an adjustable rear sight but don't remember which one.

I tried a variety of of loads, but the most accurate used a wheelweight alloy bullet cast from an RCBS mould, weighed about 88 grs. and I ran it through a .314" size die (though the bullet may have been slightly smaller than that, maybe .313"). If you find a cast bullet that fits and is of the right alloy mix for the load, there is absolutely no advantage to using a jacketed bullet in this cartridge. In fact, I'm pretty sure the right cast bullet will be more accurate than any jacketed bullet.

I used Bullseye powder for a muzzle velocity of 830 fps in a 4" barrel. I think there is a good bit of current load data available. I quickly lost interest in the cartridge and sold both revolvers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-09-2019, 08:24 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,573
Liked 22,434 Times in 8,279 Posts
Default

I have several .32's, and load a couple different bullets (Inc. the 100 Gr. Mo Bullet). I use W231, and in the Lyman loading manual it is listed as potentially most accurate powder.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 12-09-2019, 09:58 PM
Babysitr Babysitr is offline
Member
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 2,266
Liked 2,401 Times in 1,015 Posts
Default

Thank you all.....H Richard, how much W231 do you use? I want a mild target load. safe in my old Colt Police ***....am I close with the OAL? where is your OAL with the Mo bullet 100 grain?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-2019, 11:27 PM
psween psween is offline
Member
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default I use Titegroup or Bullseye

My plinking, small game, teach new shooters load is that same bullet over 1.7 of either Tiregroup or Bullseye, shot in my 30-1. Accurate, quieter than a high velocity .22, and nearly as cheap to shoot. I use a custom dipper to measure powder in that small of loads because I haven't yet found a measure that I trusted at those low of volumes.

Patrick
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2019, 07:06 AM
Babysitr Babysitr is offline
Member
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 2,266
Liked 2,401 Times in 1,015 Posts
Default

any thoughts on 2.5 Unique?? same 100 gr bullet
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2019, 08:16 AM
M29since14 M29since14 is offline
SWCA Member
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,956
Likes: 10,147
Liked 10,132 Times in 4,802 Posts
Default

I also prefer W 231 and bullets sized 0.314". I don't discuss the charge weight because it doesn't seem to be published any longer, but I continue to use it. I think it is OK to use in modern, solid-frame .32s, but maybe not a great thing in older designs that are not as strong. It was published in an older Lyman manual. My bullet of choice is the RCBS ~100 gr Keith type. This one sits further out of the case than most round nose designs.

Last edited by M29since14; 12-10-2019 at 08:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2019, 10:15 AM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,573
Liked 22,434 Times in 8,279 Posts
Default

I run the 100 Gr MO Bullet RNFP over 3.2 Gr 231, with an OAL of 1.236 and gives me 853 fps velocity.

The Speer 98 Gr HBWC I run over 2.3 Ge 231, with an OAL of .933 and it runs out at 873fps velocity.

I always thought HBWC having a higher vel over a smaller load crazy, until I think about the flush seating depth, and the smaller left case capacity giving a higher velocity.

These loads are right out of the Lyman handbook. I shoot in pre-30's and 31-1's as well as a 16-4.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-10-2019, 10:46 AM
Green Frog Green Frog is online now
Member
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,661
Likes: 1,571
Liked 9,429 Times in 4,226 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Babysitr View Post
any thoughts on 2.5 Unique?? same 100 gr bullet
That load seems a bit “enthusiastic” to me. I use 2.5 of Bullseye, though, so if you can find manufacturer’s published info confirming it, I guess it might be OK. Where did you get that suggestion?

Froggie
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-10-2019, 01:30 PM
LostintheOzone's Avatar
LostintheOzone LostintheOzone is offline
US Veteran
opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load opinions on .32 S&W Long load  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA.
Posts: 4,451
Likes: 4,511
Liked 4,492 Times in 2,190 Posts
Default

I'm using Bullseye and IMR 7625 (discontinued) which I really like. Forget about 2400 as it leaves unburnt powder everywhere. I don't like it for 32 Long. Here are some loads to consider.

Reloading .32 Smith & Wesson Long

I don't see red dot listed above but if you insist on Red Dot try this.

32 long data Speer.PDF - Microsoft Word Online
__________________
That's just somebody talkin.

Last edited by LostintheOzone; 12-10-2019 at 01:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.32 S&W Long Load Steve K Reloading 14 06-16-2018 07:43 PM
32 S&W Long Load Help zipty6 Reloading 7 02-26-2018 12:50 PM
Anybody load for the .32 S&W long? Wee Hooker Reloading 19 01-31-2017 12:38 PM
Opinions of Shorty vs Long Mags howard829 Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 24 04-17-2013 10:32 PM
.32 Long Load w10085 Reloading 9 11-12-2010 10:04 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)