I could never get a Lee progressive press work consistently.![]()
Just for my education can somebody explain the problem with the OPs press?
I have never seen a Lee progressive press so I don't understand the problem.
I picked up my laptop and turned it sideways to view the picture but still don't understand the problem.
I have a Lee turret press and have had a couple of hick ups but the Lee tech people have always been very helpful when I call them.
Many people share your experience.
My loadmaster has given me 27 years of good service, but I have an extensive engineering background.
I'm sure that Lee could design their equipment to be more user friendly.
But then it would cost as much as a Dillon.
More like a Yugo to a Rolls Royce. I had two Lee Pro 1000 presses and ended up selling one and giving the other one away to a friend, who also ended up getting rid of it.That would be like comparing a Chevy Cavalier to a Corvette.
My ammo is fantastic -- I believe this is mostly because I'm handling the powder and the bullet seating in the way I most prefer.
I actually have a new Junkm...er... Loadmaster out in the grudge. Never set it up. Don't even remember where I got it. I think I took the powder measure off to use on a Lee Classic Cast Turret press. .Even got that somewhere. I kinda got turned off Lee back a few years. Got a set of 500 S&W dies. Didn't load 20 rounds and the carbide ring broke. They wouldn't replace or fix it either. I have a classic cast turret I just got on ebay(70 bucks) to load 32 S&W/32 H&R mag. I'm gonna hunt that Loadmaster down and put it on ebay. `
Well we've had all the owners of the Lee Peo 1000 make a post. I could never get a Lee progressive press work consistently.![]()
I have an extensive background in many progressive reloading machines. Reloading equipment was my business for about 40 years. As some have said here they have good experience with the less expensive presses. Yep sometimes the stars and planets align for some. I've seen good ammo come from all kinds of progressives And I can also say there are some machines that just take too much tinkering to achieve good results. The other side of the coin...there some people that are patient as Job and they get great results. Then there are the people who shouldn't be allowed near any progressive press. I have seen my share of those. One was a good reloader till he got a P-W 800 press. Being an engineer he just couldn't leave that press alone...."improving" it. I have seen a few progressive machines that should have never been invented. Thankfully they are almost all extinct these days. The first thing we want to have is a press that will work great in the hands of reloaders. What we also want to see is reloaders that know their limitations. Some can seem to get anything to work. Wish I was that person...but still feel I do better on getting recalcitrant presses to work correctly with a reasonable amount of time getting 'em to work. BTW I bought Lee APP for some case prep and it does a surprisingly competent job. Sometimes cheap does work! Sometimes expensive...doesn't! Good grief that got longer than I intended![]()
The Lee Pro-1000 is taking a bit of a beating in this thread, but that's to be expected. It is the cheapest progressive press that I believe has ever been on the market. It's made from the lowest cost materials and has always been targeted to the budget market.
On the other hand, some of us have found serious merit in this press. I got mine in the spring of 2011 and I bought it used. I didn't care for how it handled powder and I had ideas that I could use this machine to prep brass for me.
I wanted to use it for sizing, depriming, priming, and the flaring of case mouths. I also knew that not having to pull pieces off of it would speed me up, as the machine auto ejects.
I also had another -BIG- idea, and that was to outfit my Pro-1000 to handle multiple calibers.
Now I would never make the argument that a Lee Pro-1000 matches up with any Dillon progressive press because it cannot. That would be like comparing a Chevy Cavalier to a Corvette. However if you look at what it costs for each and the utility of each, you'll find that each of them can have it's place.
I use a Lyman 55 to dispense powder and a Lee Classic Cast to seat and crimp.
I have now been using my Pro-1000 for a full 12 years to prep brass as I described above. And I use this one machine to prep brass for .32 Long, .32 H&R Mag, .327 Federal, .380, 9mm, .38 Special, .357 Mag, .40 S&W, 10mm Auto, .41 Magnum, .44 Magnum, .45 ACP, and .45 Colt and .460 Rowland. I also use it to prime .223 rifle brass.
I keep a strict round count of what I produce and since I got that used Lee Pro-1000, I've processed over 152,000 rounds of ammo with it.
I have less money in to my Pro-1000 and different shell plates and extra shell plate carriers to process the above 14 different calibers then what it costs to set up one Dillon XL-750 for one caliber. This is obviously never going to be a direct comparison, because loaded ammo doesn't get kicked from my Pro-1000, but it has been the key to advanced production at my bench and I've done it on a shoestring budget.
My ammo is fantastic -- I believe this is mostly because I'm handling the powder and the bullet seating in the way I most prefer.