Help with Lee Pro 1000 press

BOB FRONSEE

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2020
Messages
74
Reaction score
48
Location
Montana
I was reloading 9mm and after about 50 rounds this happened.
Not sure why the picture is sideways. (Pic fixed by mod.)
 

Attachments

  • Lee press.jpg
    Lee press.jpg
    75.8 KB · Views: 66
Last edited by a moderator:
Register to hide this ad
Well we've had all the owners of the Lee Peo 1000 make a post. I could never get a Lee progressive press work consistently.;)
 
I could never get a Lee progressive press work consistently.;)

Many people share your experience.
My loadmaster has given me 27 years of good service, but I have an extensive engineering background.
I'm sure that Lee could design their equipment to be more user friendly.
But then it would cost as much as a Dillon.

I should add- in the mid 90s when I was looking for a progressive, one of my serious needs was ability to reload 32ACP.
At the time the only system available was the Loadmaster,
therefore it's what I ended up with.
 
Last edited:
Just for my education can somebody explain the problem with the OPs press?
I have never seen a Lee progressive press so I don't understand the problem.
I picked up my laptop and turned it sideways to view the picture but still don't understand the problem.
I have a Lee turret press and have had a couple of hick ups but the Lee tech people have always been very helpful when I call them.
 
Just for my education can somebody explain the problem with the OPs press?
I have never seen a Lee progressive press so I don't understand the problem.
I picked up my laptop and turned it sideways to view the picture but still don't understand the problem.
I have a Lee turret press and have had a couple of hick ups but the Lee tech people have always been very helpful when I call them.


There's a bolt that holds the ram and shell plate carrier together as you work the handle and the thing moves up and down.

What happened is the bolt was not tight enough so when he pulled up on the handle to lower the thing the ram got disconnected, and the shell plate got left at the top of its travel, probably because of a case in the sizing die.

It's not a problem you'll have with your turret press.
 
The Lee Pro-1000 has a unit called the shell plate carrier that performs the bulk of the moving tasks. This unit feeds each case in to the shell plate, holds each case for it’s manipulation in each die, allows for priming and advances these cases stage by stage and ejects each case when finished.

So the shell plate carrier is the heart of the design for the Lee Pro-1000. And the shell plate carrier affixes itself to the ram with a collar and a hex bolt. When tightened down properly, the machine works to create a loaded round with each pull of the press handle.

And if that hex bolt works itself loose, the ram pulls out of it and leaves it hanging at the top with brass in each die, and that’s what has happened in this case.

Nothing here as broken, it is working as designed. These two parts coming apart are exactly what you should expect if you don’t have the fastening bolt snugged properly.
 
Many people share your experience.
My loadmaster has given me 27 years of good service, but I have an extensive engineering background.
I'm sure that Lee could design their equipment to be more user friendly.
But then it would cost as much as a Dillon.

I actually have a new Junkm...er... Loadmaster out in the grudge. Never set it up. Don't even remember where I got it. I think I took the powder measure off to use on a Lee Classic Cast Turret press. .Even got that somewhere. I kinda got turned off Lee back a few years. Got a set of 500 S&W dies. Didn't load 20 rounds and the carbide ring broke. They wouldn't replace or fix it either. I have a classic cast turret I just got on ebay(70 bucks) to load 32 S&W/32 H&R mag. I'm gonna hunt that Loadmaster down and put it on ebay. `
 
The Lee Pro-1000 is taking a bit of a beating in this thread, but that's to be expected. It is the cheapest progressive press that I believe has ever been on the market. It's made from the lowest cost materials and has always been targeted to the budget market.

On the other hand, some of us have found serious merit in this press. I got mine in the spring of 2011 and I bought it used. I didn't care for how it handled powder and I had ideas that I could use this machine to prep brass for me.

I wanted to use it for sizing, depriming, priming, and the flaring of case mouths. I also knew that not having to pull pieces off of it would speed me up, as the machine auto ejects.

I also had another -BIG- idea, and that was to outfit my Pro-1000 to handle multiple calibers.

Now I would never make the argument that a Lee Pro-1000 matches up with any Dillon progressive press because it cannot. That would be like comparing a Chevy Cavalier to a Corvette. However if you look at what it costs for each and the utility of each, you'll find that each of them can have it's place.

I use a Lyman 55 to dispense powder and a Lee Classic Cast to seat and crimp.

I have now been using my Pro-1000 for a full 12 years to prep brass as I described above. And I use this one machine to prep brass for .32 Long, .32 H&R Mag, .327 Federal, .380, 9mm, .38 Special, .357 Mag, .40 S&W, 10mm Auto, .41 Magnum, .44 Magnum, .45 ACP, and .45 Colt and .460 Rowland. I also use it to prime .223 rifle brass.

I keep a strict round count of what I produce and since I got that used Lee Pro-1000, I've processed over 152,000 rounds of ammo with it.

I have less money in to my Pro-1000 and different shell plates and extra shell plate carriers to process the above 14 different calibers then what it costs to set up one Dillon XL-750 for one caliber. This is obviously never going to be a direct comparison, because loaded ammo doesn't get kicked from my Pro-1000, but it has been the key to advanced production at my bench and I've done it on a shoestring budget.

My ammo is fantastic -- I believe this is mostly because I'm handling the powder and the bullet seating in the way I most prefer.
 
That would be like comparing a Chevy Cavalier to a Corvette.
More like a Yugo to a Rolls Royce. I had two Lee Pro 1000 presses and ended up selling one and giving the other one away to a friend, who also ended up getting rid of it.

I bought a Dillon 650 back around 1989 IIRC. I've never regretted it one bit. And now as I see an end in my reloading days approaching, I know I can sell that 650 for more than I paid for it. Seems like a good investment to me.
 
My ammo is fantastic -- I believe this is mostly because I'm handling the powder and the bullet seating in the way I most prefer.

^^This^^
I load for 19 calibers with my Load Master. I have perfected, for me, procedures which work perfectly. I belittle no one who uses a more expensive system.
I pity those who have tried to humiliate me and those like me because of their perceptions of my using equipment that is somehow "Substandard".
My system works and I am very happy with it. Others use more expensive systems that work also. More power to them.
 
I have an extensive background in many progressive reloading machines. Reloading equipment was my business for about 40 years. As some have said here they have good experience with the less expensive presses. Yep sometimes the stars and planets align for some. I've seen good ammo come from all kinds of progressives And I can also say there are some machines that just take too much tinkering to achieve good results. The other side of the coin...there some people that are patient as Job and they get great results. Then there are the people who shouldn't be allowed near any progressive press. I have seen my share of those. One was a good reloader till he got a P-W 800 press. Being an engineer he just couldn't leave that press alone...."improving" it. I have seen a few progressive machines that should have never been invented. Thankfully they are almost all extinct these days. The first thing we want to have is a press that will work great in the hands of reloaders. What we also want to see is reloaders that know their limitations. Some can seem to get anything to work. Wish I was that person...but still feel I do better on getting recalcitrant presses to work correctly with a reasonable amount of time getting 'em to work. BTW I bought Lee APP for some case prep and it does a surprisingly competent job. Sometimes cheap does work! Sometimes expensive...doesn't! Good grief that got longer than I intended:eek:
 
Last edited:
I actually have a new Junkm...er... Loadmaster out in the grudge. Never set it up. Don't even remember where I got it. I think I took the powder measure off to use on a Lee Classic Cast Turret press. .Even got that somewhere. I kinda got turned off Lee back a few years. Got a set of 500 S&W dies. Didn't load 20 rounds and the carbide ring broke. They wouldn't replace or fix it either. I have a classic cast turret I just got on ebay(70 bucks) to load 32 S&W/32 H&R mag. I'm gonna hunt that Loadmaster down and put it on ebay. `


I started out with the Loadmaster but found it to be too tempermental. I went with Redding equipment and the LM is in a box.
 
The idea of using a Pro 1000 to process brass is interesting but you are still dealing with what I considered its two greatest flaws: the auto indexing and priming system. The plastic parts in the auto indexing mechanism were always causing problems for me and the gravity operated priming system was also very unreliable and problematic. My idea of processing brass is quickly and efficiently trimming cases and swaging or reaming crimped primer pockets. A Pro 1000 can not accomplish any of those tasks. Belling the case mouths, dispensing powder and seating bullets were all tasks that the Pro 1000 performed very well. I have suddenly become motivated to study the carcass of my old Pro 1000 to see if it really has any redeeming value but I don't know if I still have it.
 
I have an extensive background in many progressive reloading machines. Reloading equipment was my business for about 40 years. As some have said here they have good experience with the less expensive presses. Yep sometimes the stars and planets align for some. I've seen good ammo come from all kinds of progressives And I can also say there are some machines that just take too much tinkering to achieve good results. The other side of the coin...there some people that are patient as Job and they get great results. Then there are the people who shouldn't be allowed near any progressive press. I have seen my share of those. One was a good reloader till he got a P-W 800 press. Being an engineer he just couldn't leave that press alone...."improving" it. I have seen a few progressive machines that should have never been invented. Thankfully they are almost all extinct these days. The first thing we want to have is a press that will work great in the hands of reloaders. What we also want to see is reloaders that know their limitations. Some can seem to get anything to work. Wish I was that person...but still feel I do better on getting recalcitrant presses to work correctly with a reasonable amount of time getting 'em to work. BTW I bought Lee APP for some case prep and it does a surprisingly competent job. Sometimes cheap does work! Sometimes expensive...doesn't! Good grief that got longer than I intended:eek:

Yes, people are different. I'm not an engineer but I do have an extensive background with mechanical devices (as an operator not a designer) and more patience than any ten people I know. I'm also stubborn and curious. I do have my limitations though. At some point the time commitment becomes onerous.

I came perilously close to my breaking point doing a caliber conversion on an RCBS Green Machine. But I got there. An RCBS engineer told me they quit selling conversion kits shortly after introduction because of all the support calls they generated.

I eventually migrated everything to a pair of Dillon 450s and sold the Green Machine. The 450s have been converted to 550 frames and are still going. But I think I've now worn out the link arms on one of them.
 
The Lee Pro-1000 is taking a bit of a beating in this thread, but that's to be expected. It is the cheapest progressive press that I believe has ever been on the market. It's made from the lowest cost materials and has always been targeted to the budget market.

On the other hand, some of us have found serious merit in this press. I got mine in the spring of 2011 and I bought it used. I didn't care for how it handled powder and I had ideas that I could use this machine to prep brass for me.

I wanted to use it for sizing, depriming, priming, and the flaring of case mouths. I also knew that not having to pull pieces off of it would speed me up, as the machine auto ejects.

I also had another -BIG- idea, and that was to outfit my Pro-1000 to handle multiple calibers.

Now I would never make the argument that a Lee Pro-1000 matches up with any Dillon progressive press because it cannot. That would be like comparing a Chevy Cavalier to a Corvette. However if you look at what it costs for each and the utility of each, you'll find that each of them can have it's place.

I use a Lyman 55 to dispense powder and a Lee Classic Cast to seat and crimp.

I have now been using my Pro-1000 for a full 12 years to prep brass as I described above. And I use this one machine to prep brass for .32 Long, .32 H&R Mag, .327 Federal, .380, 9mm, .38 Special, .357 Mag, .40 S&W, 10mm Auto, .41 Magnum, .44 Magnum, .45 ACP, and .45 Colt and .460 Rowland. I also use it to prime .223 rifle brass.

I keep a strict round count of what I produce and since I got that used Lee Pro-1000, I've processed over 152,000 rounds of ammo with it.

I have less money in to my Pro-1000 and different shell plates and extra shell plate carriers to process the above 14 different calibers then what it costs to set up one Dillon XL-750 for one caliber. This is obviously never going to be a direct comparison, because loaded ammo doesn't get kicked from my Pro-1000, but it has been the key to advanced production at my bench and I've done it on a shoestring budget.

My ammo is fantastic -- I believe this is mostly because I'm handling the powder and the bullet seating in the way I most prefer.

Still you're using it for 1/2 what it was designed to do. A Rock Chucker could fill that roll. Like running a V8 with half the cylinders locked out. Buy quality once and you don't have to compromise.
 
Back
Top