Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-22-2009, 09:03 AM
keppelj keppelj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The ransom rest, with which I have a standing love/hate relationship, gave me some satisfaction yesterday. The gun is a new 629 6" and the bullets plated 240 gr from Rainier and Berry and 240 SWCBB from Tennessee Valley Bullets. Powders were 231, HP-38, Bullseye, Herco and finally Universal. You can see why this was frustrating. I test all the options once and then retest looking for repeats. The plated bullets (RN from Berry) and (HP from Rainier) came easy a couple weeks ago at 5.9gr of 231, 1.25" groups at 25 yards. That's as good as I've come to expect from plated bullets. The bevel base lead bullets demonstrated the fickleness of the rest, giving good results at some grain measurement or another but never quite the same twice. I took the pistol and targets to the very savvy gunshop owner I bought the gun from and he said my results were pretty typical but to try Universal Clays. I got the usual best groups of 1.75" from HP38 and BE yesterday at 5.3 grains, but I got 1" from Universal at 5.0. Particularly interesting was that the groups opened up very slowly at 5.2, 5.4 etc. until they only really got to 2.5" above 6 grains. So this powder will give me good results even if I don't meter too carefully. Finally, I noted that I had a regular flyer in my groups. I numbered the cylinders, and a shooting pal drew little constellation drawings of the groups numbering the shots. Two is the wild one so I wont load it when I'm after accuracy.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-22-2009, 09:03 AM
keppelj keppelj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The ransom rest, with which I have a standing love/hate relationship, gave me some satisfaction yesterday. The gun is a new 629 6" and the bullets plated 240 gr from Rainier and Berry and 240 SWCBB from Tennessee Valley Bullets. Powders were 231, HP-38, Bullseye, Herco and finally Universal. You can see why this was frustrating. I test all the options once and then retest looking for repeats. The plated bullets (RN from Berry) and (HP from Rainier) came easy a couple weeks ago at 5.9gr of 231, 1.25" groups at 25 yards. That's as good as I've come to expect from plated bullets. The bevel base lead bullets demonstrated the fickleness of the rest, giving good results at some grain measurement or another but never quite the same twice. I took the pistol and targets to the very savvy gunshop owner I bought the gun from and he said my results were pretty typical but to try Universal Clays. I got the usual best groups of 1.75" from HP38 and BE yesterday at 5.3 grains, but I got 1" from Universal at 5.0. Particularly interesting was that the groups opened up very slowly at 5.2, 5.4 etc. until they only really got to 2.5" above 6 grains. So this powder will give me good results even if I don't meter too carefully. Finally, I noted that I had a regular flyer in my groups. I numbered the cylinders, and a shooting pal drew little constellation drawings of the groups numbering the shots. Two is the wild one so I wont load it when I'm after accuracy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2009, 01:50 PM
50 target 50 target is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Phenix City, Al.
Posts: 619
Likes: 1
Liked 100 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Thanks for sharing your efforts. You may want to edit your post as you mention the gunshop owner suggesting Universal CLAYS and then you mentioned only Universal . That might confuse some.

I am going to try that load as I have all of the components. Thanks, Bob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-23-2009, 09:55 AM
keppelj keppelj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is there another "Universal" brand name powder besides Hodgdon's Universal Clays? Good luck with your load testing. I'm very pleased I found that powder.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2009, 01:56 PM
29aholic 29aholic is offline
Banned
.44 Special accuracy testing .44 Special accuracy testing .44 Special accuracy testing .44 Special accuracy testing .44 Special accuracy testing  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,242 Times in 1,100 Posts
Default

You do realize that HP38 and W231 are identical right??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:12 PM
keppelj keppelj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yes, Curtis. I've bought HP38 when 231 wasn't on the shelves and so had it around. I used 231 to find a good load for plated bullets and I used the HP-38 under the SWCBB. When I typed the original topic above I thought someone might call me on that!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-23-2009, 08:15 PM
29aholic 29aholic is offline
Banned
.44 Special accuracy testing .44 Special accuracy testing .44 Special accuracy testing .44 Special accuracy testing .44 Special accuracy testing  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,242 Times in 1,100 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by keppelj:
Yes, Curtis. I've bought HP38 when 231 wasn't on the shelves and so had it around. I used 231 to find a good load for plated bullets and I used the HP-38 under the SWCBB. When I typed the original topic above I thought someone might call me on that!
To be honest I didnt know it until recently. I have buying powders (some out of print) when I find a bargain. I bought 3lbs of HP38 here a while back and called Mike at Hodgdon about it...and he told me.

BTW IMSC 6.5 grs of either with a 240 Keith is a good load
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
629, bullseye, universal


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Testing handgun handload accuracy? lrrifleman Reloading 42 06-24-2018 11:28 PM
Smith M&P10 final config. and accuracy testing ASH556 Smith & Wesson M&P10 Rifles 18 12-05-2013 02:58 PM
Accuracy testing Pig Hunter Reloading 11 03-16-2012 09:01 AM
Excellent Article:Testing .22 ammo velocity/accuracy Steve02C5 Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 2 09-25-2010 04:44 PM
Accuracy Testing - Do You Use DA or SA? teufelhunden S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 13 10-27-2009 02:15 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)