Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2024, 07:12 AM
BeachBumShooter BeachBumShooter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 35
Likes: 82
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default 32 H&R Mag load recommendations needed…..

Hello all. I will be picking up my new 632UC today and I need to feed it.

I have a Lee tl314-90-swc 2 cavity bullet mold on the way along with 500 pieces of new 32 H&H Mag Starline brass.
I want to use Bullseye powder and Alliant says to use 2.3 grains of Bullseye for a 98 grain LHBWC.

So, any suggestions for Bullseye and a 90 grain LSWC? My alloy is clip on wheel weights, powder coated, and lightly lubed with 45/45/10.

All opinions are welcome!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2024, 08:16 AM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 9,575
Likes: 5,017
Liked 21,406 Times in 6,457 Posts
Default

I use the 2.3 of Bullseye and a 98 grain WC.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 03-12-2024, 09:42 AM
mtgianni mtgianni is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 6,740
Likes: 10,521
Liked 6,034 Times in 2,972 Posts
Default

I find the 2.3 gr BE to be a easy shooting load and accurate on paper. I have pushed things much faster with a RCBS 98 gr swc but that is for different purposes.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 03-13-2024, 01:16 AM
moonsterman moonsterman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 133
Likes: 329
Liked 130 Times in 70 Posts
Default

same as above 2.1/2.3 gr for me under a 98gr wc
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:24 AM
Ivan the Butcher Ivan the Butcher is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Harlem, Ohio
Posts: 14,465
Likes: 23,553
Liked 26,397 Times in 9,153 Posts
Default

Not a great deal of lead 90 grain data out there.

Lyman #49 has some 90 grain jacketed bullets with 3.1 to 3.5 Bullseye going 1008 fps or so. I would try 3.8 of WW231 at 980 fps. Most of the accuracy loads were with WW231 at similar pressures to Bullseye.

I have been loading 32 S&W Long for about 40 years. here are a few things I learned about lead SWC's in that time.

Don't worry about leading the barrel. Proper fit is important, but some barrels lead no matter what! (Even at the high 900's you should be fine!) I believe it has to with the type and quality of the rifling.

The discontinued Hornady 90 grain SWC is soft lead. wax lube and very accurate! The Lee 90 gr SWC tumble lube shoots poor no matter what hardness!

A RNFP of the same weight is more accurate than a SWC, because of the higher percentage of bearing surface.

On small game, a solid hit with 90 gr SWC's is a good show!

Ivan

Last edited by Ivan the Butcher; 03-13-2024 at 03:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 03-13-2024, 07:01 AM
BeachBumShooter BeachBumShooter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 35
Likes: 82
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan the Butcher View Post
Not a great deal of lead 90 grain data out there.

Lyman #49 has some 90 grain jacketed bullets with 3.1 to 3.5 Bullseye going 1008 fps or so. I would try 3.8 of WW231 at 980 fps. Most of the accuracy loads were with WW231 at similar pressures to Bullseye.

I have been loading 32 S&W Long for about 40 years. here are a few things I learned about lead SWC's in that time.

Don't worry about leading the barrel. Proper fit is important, but some barrels lead no matter what! (Even at the high 900's you should be fine!) I believe it has to with the type and quality of the rifling.

The discontinued Hornady 90 grain SWC is soft lead. wax lube and very accurate! The Lee 90 gr SWC tumble lube shoots poor no matter what hardness!

A RNFP of the same weight is more accurate than a SWC, because of the higher percentage of bearing surface.

On small game, a solid hit with 90 gr SWC's is a good show!

Ivan
Thank for the insights gained from your experience!

I have now changed my bullet mold choice, even though I have purchased the Lee mold. I have ordered a NOE 315-102-SWC five cavity mold. Mainly because I can produce a bunch more bullets with a five cavity versus a 2 cavity with about the same effort.

Question:
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-13-2024, 09:40 AM
Ivan the Butcher Ivan the Butcher is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Harlem, Ohio
Posts: 14,465
Likes: 23,553
Liked 26,397 Times in 9,153 Posts
Default casting/sizing tip

When I cast bullets, I always end the session with a "Quick run of bulk casting." That in my case is several pours in the Lee 6 cavity Number 4 Buck mold. At 18 shot per pour, they add up fast. These are just dumped in a coffee can for future use.

I would use the high capacity 32 SWC mold the same way. Every time I was casting, just do 50 or 100 and set aside. If a need for 500 shows up, you may only need to size what you need.

My other "Always make some" bullet is the Gas Check version of good old 3115. That's Lyman's 32-20 115grain RNFP bullet. I cast hundreds to thousands extra. Then when I am sizing a certain diameter, I size several hundred of these in that diameter. That one bullet gets sized to: .308, .309, .311, & .314. That same bullet is used in 32 Long, (it is the correct bullet for 32 Colt New Police) 30 Mauser, 30 Carbine, 32-20, 7.62x39, *30-30 Win, *308 Win. *30-06, *303 British, & *7.62x54 Russian (* for plinking loads only) I'm sure it would be great in 32 H&R Mag too!

I have 120gr RN w/GC, and 84gr RN molds I do multi-sizes with also.

Having already cast & sized extras let you experiment with a new powder or a new cartridge on short notice. Such common demand bullets make good trading fodder with fellow handloaders. (or just help out a brother in need)

Ivan
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 03-13-2024, 02:10 PM
Green Frog Green Frog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,660
Likes: 1,571
Liked 9,429 Times in 4,226 Posts
Default

BeachBumShooter, I’ve loaded a bunch of 32 S&W L rounds with a 95-98 gr LSWC swaged bullet and 2.5 gr of Bullseye to shoot in my little I frame snubbie. I wouldn’t hesitate to use that load in 32 H&R brass. That 102 gr NOE bullet should hit right in the sweet spot for H&R loadings. For whatever reason, I’ve been drifting toward 231 at similar power levels, but that’s mostly due to powder availability.
Froggie
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:10 PM
Bastogne71's Avatar
Bastogne71 Bastogne71 is offline
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Posts: 978
Likes: 130
Liked 1,333 Times in 541 Posts
Default

The only source I have for a 90gr LSWC in 32 H&R Magnum is from the Hornady Handbook 4th Edition. The starting load for Bullseye is 2.2gr with the maximum of 3.1gr.

The photo is page 538 if you want to try other powders.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0318.jpg (82.0 KB, 12 views)
__________________
SWCA #3526
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:28 PM
BeachBumShooter BeachBumShooter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 35
Likes: 82
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Frog View Post
BeachBumShooter, I’ve loaded a bunch of 32 S&W L rounds with a 95-98 gr LSWC swaged bullet and 2.5 gr of Bullseye to shoot in my little I frame snubbie. I wouldn’t hesitate to use that load in 32 H&R brass. That 102 gr NOE bullet should hit right in the sweet spot for H&R loadings. For whatever reason, I’ve been drifting toward 231 at similar power levels, but that’s mostly due to powder availability.
Froggie
Thank you.
I’m going with Bullseye because I have a bunch of it and I use it for 38 special and 44 special loads. I’ll keep 231 in mind if I run across a good deal.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-13-2024, 03:32 PM
BeachBumShooter BeachBumShooter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 35
Likes: 82
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bastogne71 View Post
The only source I have for a 90gr LSWC in 32 H&R Magnum is from the Hornady Handbook 4th Edition. The starting load for Bullseye is 2.2gr with the maximum of 3.1gr.

The photo is page 538 if you want to try other powders.
Yes! That’s what I was looking for, thank you.
Ok, 2.2 up to 3.1 of Bullseye makes sense to me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.41 Mag - 215-gr. LSW load recommendations? Dave Workman Reloading 46 03-20-2023 12:32 PM
Vintage Gun 38 SPC Load recommendations Oscarflytyer Reloading 22 10-03-2018 02:21 PM
p08 9mm load recommendations jmmitc06 Reloading 12 09-16-2014 08:58 PM
44 load recommendations Dakota Iron Reloading 20 01-04-2010 02:09 PM
44 mag hunting load recommendations Littledragon777 Reloading 27 04-08-2009 02:14 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)