Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-29-2024, 10:20 AM
scooter123 scooter123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,930
Likes: 179
Liked 4,316 Times in 2,114 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike campbell View Post
Alliant Green Dot has changed.

It is not "internet myth."

Many handloaders of shotshells noticed a difference big enough to detect just by shooting. It helped that many had used the same recipe for decades.

Some handloaders resorted to the chronograph to verify their suspicions. I have personally loaded over 1,000 lbs of Green Dot thru the same bushing over a 25+ year timespan. I've chronographed that load a couple of times a year and noted differences concomitant with lot changes of the powder and primer brand....to be expected. After collecting the data for 25 years I felt confident that the more recent results, coinciding with new green cap used on recent 8lb kegs, are statistically significantly different.

A few handloaders went so far as to have loads pressure & velocity tested by independent laboratories which confirmed a "new, hotter Green Dot."

I find the conclusion irrefutable. YMMV.

P.S.

When Alliant changed Red Dot they didn't change the name. They just called it "Now 50% cleaner burning!"
It's quite possible for a powder to have the internal ballistics change without any change in the burn rate.

For example if the manufacturing process or formula is changed there can be a corresponding change in the Density. When that happens if you don't change the volume of the powder measure you are using you can see a large change in the produced velocity. It' something that drives me a bit nuts in the Shotgun World. Every time loads are discussed it's "you should use bushing X for that load and bushing Y for this load". Ask them how many grains you get with Bushing X and you get a blank stare. What is really scary about this is that current bushing tables can be 10 or 20 years out of date and I've talked to some folks who are using bushing tables published back in the 1950's because it's what their father used. Folks you need to get a scale so you know the weight of that powder charge because relying on bushing tables is potentially dangerous.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 03-29-2024, 11:44 AM
cmj8591's Avatar
cmj8591 cmj8591 is offline
Member
Propellant burning Rates changed?  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 1,187
Liked 4,571 Times in 1,643 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter123 View Post
It's quite possible for a powder to have the internal ballistics change without any change in the burn rate.

For example if the manufacturing process or formula is changed there can be a corresponding change in the Density. When that happens if you don't change the volume of the powder measure you are using you can see a large change in the produced velocity. It' something that drives me a bit nuts in the Shotgun World. Every time loads are discussed it's "you should use bushing X for that load and bushing Y for this load". Ask them how many grains you get with Bushing X and you get a blank stare. What is really scary about this is that current bushing tables can be 10 or 20 years out of date and I've talked to some folks who are using bushing tables published back in the 1950's because it's what their father used. Folks you need to get a scale so you know the weight of that powder charge because relying on bushing tables is potentially dangerous.
Something as benign as a change in humidity or temperature can change the density of the powder. I used to shoot trap with guys who loaded thousands of rounds without checking to see what their bushing actually was throwing. It's not such a big deal with a shotgun because they operate at a relatively low pressure but when loading near maximum loads for center fire, it's important to know what your measure is actually throwing.

Last edited by cmj8591; 03-29-2024 at 03:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-29-2024, 05:34 PM
mike campbell mike campbell is offline
Member
Propellant burning Rates changed? Propellant burning Rates changed? Propellant burning Rates changed? Propellant burning Rates changed? Propellant burning Rates changed?  
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 538
Likes: 91
Liked 1,535 Times in 368 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter123 View Post
It's quite possible for a powder to have the internal ballistics change without any change in the burn rate.

For example if the manufacturing process or formula is changed there can be a corresponding change in the Density. When that happens if you don't change the volume of the powder measure you are using you can see a large change in the produced velocity. It' something that drives me a bit nuts in the Shotgun World. Every time loads are discussed it's "you should use bushing X for that load and bushing Y for this load". Ask them how many grains you get with Bushing X and you get a blank stare. What is really scary about this is that current bushing tables can be 10 or 20 years out of date and I've talked to some folks who are using bushing tables published back in the 1950's because it's what their father used. Folks you need to get a scale so you know the weight of that powder charge because relying on bushing tables is potentially dangerous.

None of this post applies to me or the change I referred to.
__________________
Carry.."hope" isn't a strategy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proper Pistol, Projectile and Propellant for Pijjey Poo Problemo Bullseye 2620 The Lounge 28 12-09-2020 06:17 PM
Set Powder Dispensing Rates VS Powder DROP Rates HorizontalMike Reloading 24 10-03-2018 10:52 AM
LR Magnum vs. LR Match Primers with a slow propellant DWalt Reloading 17 03-26-2017 09:56 PM
Has anyone heard of Hogdo0n H240 propellant? DWalt Reloading 3 04-03-2013 10:51 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)