Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Notices

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2024, 08:39 AM
Yankeetom Yankeetom is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
Liked 30 Times in 9 Posts
Default HBWC velocity

I’m looking for chronographed velocities that you fellow loaders find the most accurate at 15 & 25 yards. That would be with a 148 grain HBWC in .38 special out of a 4” barrel. Not looking for recipes, just what speed y’all find most accurate!
Thanks…Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-24-2024, 08:58 AM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is online now
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,420
Likes: 18,161
Liked 24,421 Times in 6,900 Posts
Default

800 +\- 25fps
__________________
213th FBINA
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 04-24-2024, 09:13 AM
BE Mike's Avatar
BE Mike BE Mike is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 2,293
Liked 3,517 Times in 1,495 Posts
Default

Measuring the velocity won't necessarily give you the most accurate rounds. Neither will looking for the smallest SD, etc. The best way to do it is to start out with a known accurate bullet and powder charge. Actual accuracy testing by shooting will give you your accuracy comparison. The most reliable is a machine rest. There are some nuances to loading the particular 148 gr. HBWC that bullseye pistol shooters are trying. A lot has to do with special attachments so the soft bullet isn't distorted when being seated in the empty case. That being said, you can get good accuracy out to 25 yards in a good handgun by using good standard reloading dies and equipment.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 04-24-2024, 09:31 AM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,988
Likes: 3,056
Liked 14,413 Times in 5,485 Posts
Default

If you do not want to risk losing a skirt in the barrel, keep it to around 750 fps or lower. I budged a barrel in a beautiful 38 Masterpiece running at around 775 fps while shooting commercial made 148g HBWC. I simply will never shoot another hollow-based bullet in any gun. I find that SWC or standard wadcutters are just as accurate as hollow-based bullets.


I found an interesting article in the November 2018 magazine on wadcutter bullets. https://www.handloadermagazine.com/wadcutters One compelling statement was as follows:

Commercial lead-swaged wadcutters are aggravating because they leave smears of lead in a revolver’s forcing cone and barrel when shot at velocities as low as 700 fps.
Hollowbase wadcutters are a relic of the past, when the expanding skirt of the base was required to spread out to seal barrel bores that varied widely in diameter.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2024, 09:31 AM
trulyapostolic's Avatar
trulyapostolic trulyapostolic is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North Central, Indiana
Posts: 255
Likes: 45
Liked 53 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Around 720fps.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2024, 09:35 AM
Ivan the Butcher Ivan the Butcher is offline
Suspended
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Harlem, Ohio
Posts: 14,485
Likes: 23,623
Liked 26,488 Times in 9,172 Posts
Default

My F-I-L was a major player in the 60's & 70's. His preferred velocity for 4" S&W's was 675-700 fps. But depending on the primer he had to adjust the powder charge by two tenths of a grain to maintain the velocity. Primer Brand is important!

Ivan
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 04-24-2024, 10:01 AM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is online now
US Veteran
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 5,066
Liked 21,608 Times in 6,518 Posts
Default

Interesting..........

I have never used my chronograph, got it in a deal and it sits on a shelf. Never have felt the need to use it. I have always tested loads to see which was the most accurate by shooting them. I do use a program called Quickload, when figuring out what is safe and what is not. I have found that in my S&W 52 a HBWC of 148 grains with 2.8 grains of Bullseye is the most accurate. According to the Quickload program this has a velocity of 610 FPS.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 04-24-2024, 10:38 AM
glenwolde's Avatar
glenwolde glenwolde is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 1,632
Liked 6,397 Times in 2,325 Posts
Default

Somewhere between 700 and 725. But it's been a while since I've tested them.

I found a cast button-nosed wadcutter can be every bit as accurate, even at higher velocities. Plus the cast and coated versions are cleaner in your gun and your dies. You have a lot more velocity leeway with the cast bullet.

My favorite commercial cast is Acme Bullets' no-lube groove design. If I were to cast my own I'd dig out my RCBS-148-WC mold from storage. I have not gotten as good results with the cast or swaged DEWCs. But I might not have tried hard enough.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 04-24-2024, 10:43 AM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,828
Likes: 18,633
Liked 22,470 Times in 8,294 Posts
Default

It's an, "It all depends", answer. The actual more of the using firearm can have a difference. The amount of crimp put on the cartridge can make a difference. The accuracy of the loading powder dispenser can make a difference. The brand of HBWC bullets can make a difference.



I recommend you take a recommended load (from a loading manual), use a taper crimp die adjusted to no more than .003 crimp. Use Federal primers. Set the seating depth to not quite flush with case mouth. Load and shoot from your gun over a sandbag rest.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 04-24-2024, 10:58 AM
mtgianni mtgianni is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 6,762
Likes: 10,560
Liked 6,062 Times in 2,987 Posts
Default

I got my best accuracy at 775 fps but that was with a home cast hbwc and conventional lube in one groove, not a swedged one with thin lube coating. I had some pure lead and just found that one cylinder molds in revolvers were a pain.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 04-24-2024, 02:23 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
US Veteran
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,416
Likes: 3,196
Liked 12,783 Times in 5,696 Posts
Default

I have good accuracy out of my snub nose M49 with a HBwc lead bullet from
600 to 800fps, with (12) twelve different powders also (5) five spp's,
over the years of developing loads.

With a 6" barrel, 700 to 800fps works for me, with Red Dot getting my best group,
of all powders tested with my 686 revolver.

If you need a faster load, go to a BBwc , which is almost as accurate,
in my test.
Have fun.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 04-25-2024, 08:00 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 19,647
Liked 11,913 Times in 5,408 Posts
Default

Swaged lead HBWC will behave a little differently from a cast lead HBWC. Swaged lead is very soft and too much velocity can cause the hollow skirt to separate from the core of the bullet. Cast lead is harder and will tolerate a higher velocity. I'd say 650-700 fps would be good for a swaged lead bullet, but it will take a little more pressure to get a cast HBWC's skirt to expand and seal the bore, so a cast HBWC at 700-800 fps should be good. Nevada Ed is right about the solid wadcutter bullets, which are usually cast lead. Those can be driven to even higher velocity, just like a cast semi-wadcutter or round nose bullet.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA

Last edited by stansdds; 04-25-2024 at 08:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-25-2024, 09:59 AM
BE Mike's Avatar
BE Mike BE Mike is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 2,293
Liked 3,517 Times in 1,495 Posts
Default

Federal factory .38 SPL 148 gr. Match Hollow Base Wadcutter has a velocity of 730-755 fps out of a 5" S&W model 52-1, according to my chronograph test.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-25-2024, 11:42 AM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,715
Likes: 245
Liked 29,276 Times in 14,148 Posts
Default

I never worried about MV. My testing indicated that a DEWC over 2.9 grains of Bullseye gave the best performance in my Model 14, so I used nothing else.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #15  
Old 04-25-2024, 08:38 PM
27 Man 27 Man is offline
SWCA Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 2,481
Liked 737 Times in 396 Posts
Default

I use a 148 grain button nose WC over 2.7 BE. Back in the day when I was into casting, I used a Lyman 35891 mold and had success with it in my model 14. Never checked the velocity, just holes in X ring.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 04-25-2024, 09:28 PM
StrawHat's Avatar
StrawHat StrawHat is online now
SWCA Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,126
Likes: 9,389
Liked 13,871 Times in 4,070 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds View Post
…Swaged lead HBWC will behave a little differently from a cast lead HBWC. Swaged lead is very soft and too much velocity can cause the hollow skirt to separate from the core of the bullet. Cast lead is harder and will tolerate a higher velocity...
How is a pure lead cast bullet different from a pure lead swaged bullet? It is not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds View Post
…Nevada Ed is right about the solid wadcutter bullets, which are usually cast lead. Those can be driven to even higher velocity, just like a cast semi-wadcutter or round nose bullet...
It all depends on the alloy. I was running cast lead solid wadcutters at 900 fps. But, the were alloyed with tin at a 16/1 ratio. Trying the same speed with pure lead would be a waste of time.

Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 04-25-2024, 10:37 PM
bluetopper's Avatar
bluetopper bluetopper is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 624
Liked 1,046 Times in 415 Posts
Default

From my experience 3.7gr of Unique listed in a very old Lyman book is just as accurate as 2.8 of Bullseye.
__________________
Where we go one, we go all
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-26-2024, 08:20 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 19,647
Liked 11,913 Times in 5,408 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawHat View Post
How is a pure lead cast bullet different from a pure lead swaged bullet? It is not.



It all depends on the alloy. I was running cast lead solid wadcutters at 900 fps. But, the were alloyed with tin at a 16/1 ratio. Trying the same speed with pure lead would be a waste of time.

Kevin
I think most of us buy commercially made bullets and commercially made cast lead is usually not pure lead, but an alloy that is harder than pure lead. If you cast your own, then you can cast a bullet that will be as soft as a swaged lead bullet.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #19  
Old 04-26-2024, 10:14 AM
Greyman50's Avatar
Greyman50 Greyman50 is offline
US Veteran
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,790
Likes: 13,235
Liked 6,207 Times in 2,449 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ View Post
Interesting..........

I have never used my chronograph, got it in a deal and it sits on a shelf. Never have felt the need to use it. I have always tested loads to see which was the most accurate by shooting them. I do use a program called Quickload, when figuring out what is safe and what is not. I have found that in my S&W 52 a HBWC of 148 grains with 2.8 grains of Bullseye is the most accurate. According to the Quickload program this has a velocity of 610 FPS.
I do the same, never load hot or close to hot loads unless for SD loads and I go by the book. Used the same 2.8 grns of Bullseye for my Colt Mid Range and am shooting the few 100 of the left over ones in any revolver, Very accurate.
Reloading is safe and simple as long as one has common sense and Goes by the reloading manual.
Seems way to many reloaders get carried away.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-26-2024, 08:24 PM
StrawHat's Avatar
StrawHat StrawHat is online now
SWCA Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,126
Likes: 9,389
Liked 13,871 Times in 4,070 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds View Post
I think most of us buy commercially made bullets and commercially made cast lead is usually not pure lead, but an alloy that is harder than pure lead. If you cast your own, then you can cast a bullet that will be as soft as a swaged lead bullet.
I had not considered your point about commercial casters. Yes, most of them cast a bullet much too hard and undersized for use. There are several low volume commercial casters who will do custom alloys.

At one time, I cast everything I shot. Now, only occasionally.

Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 04-26-2024, 09:35 PM
Model19man Model19man is offline
SWCA Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 666
Liked 1,592 Times in 677 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yankeetom View Post
I’m looking for chronographed velocities that you fellow loaders find the most accurate at 15 & 25 yards. That would be with a 148 grain HBWC in .38 special out of a 4” barrel. Not looking for recipes, just what speed y’all find most accurate!
Thanks…Tom
I would say you need to figure out what load is most accurate in your revolver. Basically the most accurate rounds using a 148 grain HBWC will be from 600 - 800 FPS. Find out what yours likes.
__________________
S&WHF #946
S&WCA #3824
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-27-2024, 02:28 AM
Thom_44 Thom_44 is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 148
Likes: 2
Liked 83 Times in 53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model19man View Post
I would say you need to figure out what load is most accurate in your revolver. Basically the most accurate rounds using a 148 grain HBWC will be from 600 - 800 FPS. Find out what yours likes.
but at what range whilst they be accurate.. is the real question
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-27-2024, 07:55 AM
StrawHat's Avatar
StrawHat StrawHat is online now
SWCA Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,126
Likes: 9,389
Liked 13,871 Times in 4,070 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thom_44 View Post
but at what range whilst they be accurate.. is the real question
For matches, I shot to 50 yards. In practice, I would stretch the range to 100. I developed much better sight hold and trigger squeeze at that range. I believe Ed Harris went even further out.

Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-27-2024, 08:10 AM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is online now
US Veteran
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 5,066
Liked 21,608 Times in 6,518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thom_44 View Post
but at what range whilst they be accurate.. is the real question
By "what range", I am going to assume that you mean velocity. For me, my program says the load I am using is 610 FPS. But as the saying goes your mileage my vary. I use 2.8 grains of Bullseye and that makes me happy with the accuracy. You may have to use 2.9 or a tad more, or 2.7 or a tad less. Reloading is the best way to go for a lot of us. It is the experimenting to find the proper/most accurate load that is fun. It will give you a sense of accomplishment.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-27-2024, 12:13 PM
SGT ROCK 11B SGT ROCK 11B is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 834
Likes: 1,097
Liked 918 Times in 454 Posts
Default

700 fps average S&W 686 Plus four inch (2.8 grains Bullseye Speer HBWC)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-27-2024, 12:19 PM
3rdgeargrndrr's Avatar
3rdgeargrndrr 3rdgeargrndrr is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 1,635
Liked 1,167 Times in 532 Posts
Default

I have to say this from past experience, with these velocities, never shoot steel.
My load if Unique or Bullseye is NA, is Hp38/231 3.2gn from my 66
__________________
Romans5:8
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-27-2024, 09:30 PM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is online now
US Veteran
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 5,066
Liked 21,608 Times in 6,518 Posts
Default

I shot this the other day. Not the 50 yards everyone is talking about, shot that range when I had good eyes and 35 years earlier. Now at 72 and needing cataracts worked on I shoot 15 yards. But I still shoot in the off-hand and not supported. Did throw one out of the group. Used a Silver Dollar for size comparison.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg M52 Group 4.26.24.jpg (152.8 KB, 19 views)
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #28  
Old 04-28-2024, 07:58 PM
noylj's Avatar
noylj noylj is offline
Member
HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity HBWC velocity  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 495
Likes: 1
Liked 222 Times in 143 Posts
Default

Do NOT shoot 800fps or faster loads with HBWCs-- the skirt will separate from the front of the bullet. 25-50 yard accuracy is best at 600-700fps.
Use Zero or Precision Delta bullets. Try Bullseye, AA2, and 231/HP38
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transition from standard velocity to high velocity. .22LR ammo & .22/32 HFT mrcvs S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 25 03-16-2024 08:52 AM
.45 HBWC in 45 acp? Jebus35745 Reloading 33 05-07-2020 09:45 PM
686+ and HBWC Amp S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 11 03-14-2020 01:06 PM
.44 HBWC andy52 Reloading 15 12-21-2019 12:17 PM
38 HBWC ScottZ Reloading 11 03-11-2013 12:43 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)