Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2009, 06:53 PM
Slim Jim Slim Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is 6.5 grs. of Unique behind a 240gr. cast bullet a safe load for my 696? I know it works in other .44s but I'm concerned about the forcing cone in mine. Will this get me around 800-850fps?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-23-2009, 06:53 PM
Slim Jim Slim Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is 6.5 grs. of Unique behind a 240gr. cast bullet a safe load for my 696? I know it works in other .44s but I'm concerned about the forcing cone in mine. Will this get me around 800-850fps?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:59 PM
mike from st pete's Avatar
mike from st pete mike from st pete is offline
Member
696 ?? 696 ?? 696 ?? 696 ?? 696 ??  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: st pete fla
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 5,648
Liked 2,763 Times in 1,213 Posts
Default

I use 6.2 and a 240 LSWC in mine and have good luck with them
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-24-2009, 09:20 PM
Spotteddog Spotteddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,949
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Yes,
They are thin. BUT, the fragility of these guns has grown into an urban legend now. I'm surprised barrels aren't falling off of them nation wide by now, with it's skinny forcing cone and threads being left behind? Reload with sanity, use lead, and make sure she doesn't get out of time. Do those three things, and she'll out last both of us! Mine hasn't bit the hand that feeds her for 12 years now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2009, 05:19 AM
Slim Jim Slim Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys, I was hoping for more response to my post but I apreciate the two replies. Slim Jim
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-25-2009, 12:32 PM
Spotteddog Spotteddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,949
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Your probably not going to see a lot of responses for a couple of reasons. First, not a ton of them were bought originally when new. Second, those that were bought later as NIB often got squirreled away in a safe as an investment or part of a collectors passions. Third, only someone who reloads could afford to shoot one much, without having to take up residence in a refrigerator box in an alley. Fourth, because re-loaders tend to be amateur metallurgist's, engineers and born "tinkerer's", we tend to inspect sometimes overly so, in search of possible problems before they crop up. Fifth and probably most importantly, is the fact that 90%+ of folks into this hobby/sport, tend to end up being OCD. Which is probably a good thing, considering how easy it would be to put an eye out playing with them!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2009, 01:35 PM
Slim Jim Slim Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

To me the 696 was the ideal piece for what I wanted and it would be shame not to shoot it. My first few boxes of ammo were, unknown to me, part of a special purchase. When that was shot up I nearly fainted at the full price of .44 specials. That's what has started me reloading again after a neary 40 year hiatus. The $30 a box cost of jacketed bullets was the reason for switching to cast of which I know nothing. about.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
696


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)