|
|
10-10-2009, 08:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
.22 Cal Schofield
|
10-10-2009, 09:18 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocean Shores, WA, USA
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 201
Liked 5,067 Times in 1,770 Posts
|
|
A fool and his money will soon be parted.
Maybe not, it's got a un-met reserve.
__________________
Dean
SWCA #680 SWHF #446
|
10-10-2009, 10:49 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC USA
Posts: 551
Likes: 56
Liked 403 Times in 121 Posts
|
|
.22 Cal Schofield
Might just be one of those "Training Models"!
|
10-11-2009, 08:32 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 6,305
Likes: 922
Liked 870 Times in 256 Posts
|
|
An extremely rare, one of a kind prototype!
__________________
Misty
|
10-11-2009, 10:31 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas Panhandle
Posts: 541
Likes: 240
Liked 380 Times in 103 Posts
|
|
So the cylinder was sleeved, the "ejector star" replaced and maybe the barrel sleeved? The hammer modifed for rimfire? Anything else necessary to make this conversion?
I think its a great gun, especially if it really shoots fairly well. I'm not a collector of pure unfired guns; but this shows some ingenuity and effort to make something that met someone's shooting needs, wants, or desires.
I like it, but unfortunately can't afford it this week. :-)
Your opinions may, and probably will, vary.
rayb
|
10-11-2009, 10:35 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocean Shores, WA, USA
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 201
Liked 5,067 Times in 1,770 Posts
|
|
I don't think it's a question of "neatness". (I think it is "neat"). But $1500+ for a butchered, refinished, etc. gun?
I think not.
__________________
Dean
SWCA #680 SWHF #446
|
10-11-2009, 10:54 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Far Southwest Virginia
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 512
Liked 3,819 Times in 477 Posts
|
|
I'd like it if it was $400 or so....
|
10-11-2009, 11:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 906
Likes: 1,362
Liked 2,349 Times in 462 Posts
|
|
Back when S&W revolvers were the kings on the target range, this may have been some poor fellows attempt to turn an old "dog" into something he could compete with.
He just could't see into the future when the Schofield would become something other than an "old army pistol". Pretty neat conversion, and these days very cost effective - if you want a shooter.
Last edited by 153; 10-12-2009 at 01:15 AM.
|
10-11-2009, 01:26 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,563
Liked 22,433 Times in 8,279 Posts
|
|
Yes, that is really neat, and I wish I had it, and no I wouldn't pay more than around $400 or so to have one. Too bad whoever did it ruined a scarce gun, but it looks like it probably had no finish left when he started on it. Even so, from a monetary point, it was a mistake.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
10-11-2009, 04:35 PM
|
US Veteran SWCA Founding Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
|
|
I have a similar S&W. It's a .22 Single Shot American model, with an amazing amount of very fine custom gun smithing to convert the gun from a revolver to a single shot .22RF. It now resembles a Colt Camp Perry model. The time, labor & cost of doing it probably far exceeded what you would have paid for several new S&W single shots, so it was a labor of extreme love, or a factory prototype. I forwarded the Gun Broker posting to a couple of serious Schofield addicts and their opinions were very positive about it being a "neat gun, etc. " They did not think it was a waste of a good gun, as it was apparently in marginal condition before, plus you can always convert in back to .45. Ed Cornett SWCA #15
Last edited by opoefc; 10-11-2009 at 10:55 PM.
|
10-11-2009, 05:52 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,242 Times in 1,100 Posts
|
|
I had a Colt SAA someone had converted to 22. It shot pretty good but weighed a ton!!!
|
10-11-2009, 11:26 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK area
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 1,461
Liked 7,056 Times in 1,581 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 29aholic
I had a Colt SAA someone had converted to 22. It shot pretty good but weighed a ton!!!
|
I have a S&W 1917 that someone converted to .22. It's heavy too, but doesn't shoot worth a flip.
|
10-12-2009, 12:30 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Huntsville, Texas
Posts: 346
Likes: 34
Liked 118 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
I have a #2 Army 1867 vintage converted to 22LR, it shoots like a house afire conmsidering the small grip frame. The front sight has been replaced by dove tailing a long based bead style sight in place. While a desirable gun has been converted, I can shoot it with common every day Wally World ammo thus using it for it's intended purpose, not sitting around looking for collectors ammo to go to the range with.
Ed, I hope to see you at Tulsa.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|