|
|
05-07-2012, 10:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 1
Liked 13 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Engraved 1 1/2 SA
Evening all my name is Len (thirdwheel). This past weekend I purchased this old Smith. It surfaced at a small country auction in Illinois. I found & copied the S&W Letter of Authenticity Request Form & that will be in the mail tomorrow. Meanwhile if any of the experts here would be willing to offer their guidance in my research it would be most appreciated. The SN is 48xx
|
05-08-2012, 07:16 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 1,052
Liked 2,547 Times in 462 Posts
|
|
I don't know if it's factory, but it sure is beautiful.
Bob
|
05-08-2012, 09:04 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,977
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,371 Times in 5,477 Posts
|
|
Very nice 1 1/2. With the early serial number, it was probably manufactured in the 1878-1879. In total, over 97,000 of these were made from 1878 to 1892.
I can't quite tell, but does that SA have a strain screw in the front strap of the grip frame? It seems that I can almost see one in your pictures. If so, it is an anomaly, since they were not installed in that location until somewhere around SN 6580.
|
05-08-2012, 09:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 1
Liked 13 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Your eyes are fine, yes that is a screw
|
05-08-2012, 09:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 1
Liked 13 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
1 1/2 SA
Took a couple more photos. I read that side plate engravings are scarce. Could this help identify the engraver? If anyone would like other photos please request what you would like to see.
|
05-08-2012, 11:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: puget sound
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
I don't think it is factory or even period engraving. It was done recently but I can not identify the engraver.
Mark
__________________
Mark Connot
|
05-08-2012, 12:22 PM
|
US Veteran SWCA Founding Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
|
|
I agree with Mark. From what I can see in the photos, The "style" appears to be an intent to duplicate period work, with a panel scene. Also, the refinish, done after the engraving, is not the quality that a period New York engraver would have done. The work could be a recut of worn NY engraving, but I doubt that. Nevertheless, it's a flashy gun. Ed.
|
05-08-2012, 12:44 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,977
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,371 Times in 5,477 Posts
|
|
I am curious about the grip screw. This revolver serial number indicates that it was produced at least 2000 lower than the accepted serial number range for the introduction of this alteration?
The factory letter will tell the story about the engraving and I would make sure to let Roy Jinks know about the grip screw, since I got the information on the serial number introduction from one of Roy's books. He would most likely be interested in that feature.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|