|
|
04-12-2022, 04:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 2,385
Liked 5,808 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
|
38/200
I have a 38/200 wich I believe is same as 1905 4th change. According to S&W 4th edition commercial version has grips with medallions which mine does and they # to the gun. Book also says military version has lanyard ring which mine also has, and it looks factory with grips off. It is 38 S&W with 5” barrel. There are no markings or import proofs on gun. There is a P on opposite side of lanyard ring from serial #. So do I simply have a commercial/civilian model that left the factory with a lanyard ring for whatever reason? I’m sure someone WAY more knowledgeable than me knows the answer. Thanks.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-12-2022, 04:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,937
Likes: 257
Liked 29,605 Times in 14,280 Posts
|
|
Likely a pre-1942 BSR. What is the SN?
|
04-12-2022, 05:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 2,385
Liked 5,808 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
|
8253**. I just realized my pics are both of same side of gun. Sorry
|
04-12-2022, 05:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,937
Likes: 257
Liked 29,605 Times in 14,280 Posts
|
|
You do have a pre-1942 BSR. On my list is 826069 which shipped on 9/24/41. Also commonly termed as a Pre-Victory BSR (British Service Revolver). Does it have the UNITED STATES PROPERTY stamping on the topstrap? By that time it could. That would indicate it is a Lend-Lease gun.
|
04-12-2022, 06:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 2,385
Liked 5,808 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
|
Thanks DWalt. Nope no markings of any kind. That’s what had me stumped.
|
04-12-2022, 06:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 2,385
Liked 5,808 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
|
It just didn’t match description perfectly in “the 4th edition” as to being commercial or military.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-12-2022, 06:51 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,008
Likes: 5,170
Liked 19,399 Times in 6,961 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bald1
It just didn’t match description perfectly in “the 4th edition” as to being commercial or military.
|
If it is the stocks throwing you off, many of the early BSRs did ship with the 1930s style service stocks (checkered with medallions). And yours is right on the cusp of the L/L, so not having a property stamp could easily be correct.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-13-2022, 08:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 2,385
Liked 5,808 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
|
Thanks to both of you guys for info. I aquired gun several yrs ago from an estate. It was a pkg deal. I’m finally getting around to making notes and values on all my firearms. Someday I’ll be gone and I’d like my estate to have an idea of what’s what.
|
04-13-2022, 08:15 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast FL
Posts: 5,678
Likes: 7,513
Liked 15,397 Times in 3,678 Posts
|
|
That's a nice example. I have been after on for some time, but can't seem to find one in the condition/price that suits me..
__________________
Robert
SWCA #2906, SWHF #760
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-13-2022, 08:25 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,294
Likes: 1,105
Liked 19,370 Times in 9,448 Posts
|
|
The earliest examples of these British contract guns had a polished commercial blue finish. Yours 'may' have the less shiny brushed blue finish, and just before the V prefix gun started production in early 1942 they appeared exactly the same as Victory Models, with the dull phosphate finish. Enjoy!
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-13-2022, 09:04 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 9,014
Liked 9,910 Times in 2,006 Posts
|
|
It looks just like mine that shipped to the British Purchasing Commission in New York on 25 Nov 1940. Except mine has a 6 inch barrel.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-13-2022, 10:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 2,385
Liked 5,808 Times in 2,090 Posts
|
|
Murphy dog. I agree it has a somewhat dull finish but not pakerized. So probably brushed or blasted blue finish. I really like it now but I ended up with it because I also got early 41 with cocking indicator and some others less expensive newer long guns which I’ve since traded or sold.
|
04-13-2022, 01:16 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,762
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bald1
Murphy dog. I agree it has a somewhat dull finish but not pakerized. So probably brushed or blasted blue finish. …
|
According to the primary sources (Williams/Hellstrom), the finish changed from bright blue to brush blue around serial 860,000 in Dec. 1941, so this one is somewhat early for that, and in the photos the finish doesn’t strike me as noticeably dull.
The stocks changed to smooth walnut about a month later. There is overlap in the low 900-thousands.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-13-2022, 01:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 784
Liked 1,998 Times in 701 Posts
|
|
I have a Colt Official police in 38-200.
It dates to 1941. A pretty cool revolver.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-16-2022, 01:38 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,004
Likes: 35,185
Liked 10,829 Times in 3,694 Posts
|
|
Bald1, I'm honored you asked for my opinion on your BSR. You've already received some terrific input from several real experts. I really can't add anything useful to this thread.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-16-2022, 06:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 348
Likes: 71
Liked 405 Times in 94 Posts
|
|
Original post deleted -- errors. I have a similar gun that was treated in a thread "PreWar .38 S&W" on January 25 of this year.
Last edited by McShooty; 04-18-2022 at 11:57 AM.
Reason: correction
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|