|
View Poll Results: Should I have it refinished, or leave it alone?
|
Send to S&W for a factory refinish.
|
|
5 |
16.13% |
Send to Fords of FL for a refinish.
|
|
2 |
6.45% |
Leave it alone!
|
|
24 |
77.42% |
|
11-14-2009, 02:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 1,279
Liked 3,345 Times in 570 Posts
|
|
K22 second model, to refinish or not to refinish?
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-14-2009, 02:28 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,974
Likes: 1,031
Liked 19,149 Times in 9,358 Posts
|
|
I would vote no on a refinish. A professional redo would make it look nicer but in my opinion would not add, or might even subtract, from its collector value. If the brown areas in the photos are rust, I would try to remove them so they don't go deeper into the metal, but that would be it.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-14-2009, 02:58 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 14,005
Likes: 5,021
Liked 7,717 Times in 2,631 Posts
|
|
I would also leave it unrefinished. If it was one of 100,000 and you wanted a better looking shooter, I'd say to do what you want. Or if it had already been refinished once and needed a touch up, I don't think would hurt collector value much. But an original K-22 Second that hasn't been touched yet? I think I would give it a total breakdown, then an immersion cleaning -- well, just paint it with Kroil or something better and seal it in a baggie for a couple of days -- to get all the rust off and stabilize it. Then I would oil it thoroughly and keep it as the treasure it is. I wouldn't be afraid to shoot it, either. Somebody kind of let it go once, but the best thing you can do is clean it up after their neglect and then keep after it in the future.
Just two cents rolling in from California.
__________________
David Wilson
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-14-2009, 03:09 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: up-state SC
Posts: 759
Likes: 134
Liked 90 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Since you seem to be undecided I would suggest leaving it as is. In my opinion the gun has no or very little collector value. It's value is as a shooter. Enjoy the gun for a while and you may be able to decide with confidence at a later date.
|
11-14-2009, 03:19 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,603
Likes: 3,716
Liked 8,968 Times in 3,560 Posts
|
|
I would cast my vote for leave it alone. As others have said, put it unassembled in a tupper wear container with a sealed lid in either Hoppe's or your favorite cleaning solution. Let it soak for a few days and then do a through cleaning. Apply a coat of Renaissance Wax and call it good to go. The condition of this gun is what it is and you can't change that. It is the end result of the care that was given this particular gun and is part of its own personal history. Any refinish either factory or Fords changes all of that forever.
But that said, it's your gun and you can do to it whatever you so choose.
Best regards,
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
11-14-2009, 03:24 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF East Bay - "the delta"
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 1,587
Liked 4,495 Times in 1,516 Posts
|
|
It looks like the gun has been modified by having a modern rear sight installed and the original front sight blade machined off and a patridge replacement pinned into place. If so, that pretty much kills it off as a collector piece in the purist sense of the word.
I have a M&P 1905 1st model in equally rough shape where the front sight has been altered, and someone used a cleaning chemical that stripped the bluing where ever it dribbled out of the barrel onto the surfaces:
Part of me wants to ship it off to Ford's, but I've also been able to track the history of it as being shipped to San Francisco 3 months after the 1906 Earthquake.
I bought it from the wife of a long retired SFPD officer that passed away, who said that her husband got it handed down to him from his Dad.
What role it played during the uncertain times the followed the 1906 Quake 3 months earlier is something I'd love to be able to determine.
With that bit of background, I've decided not to do anything with it at the moment, as I think it's condition adds to it's character and service history.
But having said that, if I had no such info on the background of it, I would have sent it to Ford's to enjoy it's restored glory as a shooter.
I like Ford's, S&W no longer does their own bluing and although I haven't heard any negative comments lately, at one time their refinishing quality was erratic. Ford's has never gotten a negative review as far as I know, plus they have a couple of options for the type of bluing, so you can choose what's best for the overall shape of the gun. Also, there might be a cut off point on how old of a gun S&W will accept for refinishing, I know they have one for repair work.
And as others have said, only you can make the decision, and this is just my .02 worth.
Last edited by Gunhacker; 11-14-2009 at 05:30 PM.
Reason: spelling and woodsmithing
|
11-14-2009, 03:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 1
Liked 22 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Yup, get it clean and enjoy it!
|
11-14-2009, 04:42 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 1,279
Liked 3,345 Times in 570 Posts
|
|
Quote:
It looks like the gun has been modified by having a modern rear sight installed and the original front sight blade machined off and a patridge replacement pinned into place. If so, that pretty much kills it off as a collector piece in the purist sense of the word.
|
Actually this is the standard sight configuration for the K22 2nd model. Pinned partridge as well as the newer target masterpiece rear sight is in fact all I've ever seen in a 2nd model. Perhaps you're thinking of a K-22 outdoorsman or maybe you never saw one of these before.
Since it is rare, I think I will leave it the way it is. I think there's still collector value left due to its rarity and it still could clean up well so there's no point in restoring it when one stops and thinks about it.
|
11-14-2009, 05:25 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF East Bay - "the delta"
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 1,587
Liked 4,495 Times in 1,516 Posts
|
|
Yep... you're correct, I was thinking in terms of the K-22 Outdoorsman.. and I've learned something new. Thanks for elaborating on it, it's much appreciated.
I always though the windage adjustment screw heads were smaller than that, which is what made me think modern sights.
Last edited by Gunhacker; 11-14-2009 at 05:27 PM.
|
11-14-2009, 05:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western Phraudsylvania
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 839
Liked 1,239 Times in 450 Posts
|
|
I'm with the majority on this one. Soak it in Hoppes-9 for a couple of days, clean it up and wax it. I did that to a 1947 K22 that was in about the same state of disrepair as yours, and it turned out to be a keeper. Of course, K22's are sort of addictive regardless of their condition. Anyways, If you don't like the results, you can always send it out for refinishing at a later date. However, if you refinish it first, you can never recover its original character. Your pre-war K22 Masterpiece (2nd, or whatever the politically correct terminology is these days) is a rare bird, and despite its current state of cosmetically challenged finish, it will always have collector value. Probably less so if it gets refinished. -S2
PS- Be sure to take the grips off before soaking it. If you want, I'll be happy to "preserve" them for you; I've got one that needs such a pair.
|
11-14-2009, 07:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 655
Likes: 293
Liked 190 Times in 77 Posts
|
|
I'm with the leave it alone bunch. Clean, lubricate, wax, enjoy.
Rod
|
11-14-2009, 07:44 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocean Shores, WA, USA
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 202
Liked 5,076 Times in 1,774 Posts
|
|
Do what you can to kill the existing rust so it doesn't get any worse, wax it up and enjoy. It is what it is and has character.
Besides, sending it to S&W (if they will even take it because of its age) you will not get a finish resembling what was originally on the gun. You will get a modern finish which just won't look right.
__________________
Dean
SWCA #680 SWHF #446
|
11-14-2009, 09:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: TN
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Were it mine, I'd leave it rough. I like to shoot my guns and having a worn one removes any scratch-anxiety.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-15-2009, 10:00 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Standish, Maine
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
I think it should not be refinished either. I would use some Hoppe's # 9 or similar and a copper/brass chore girl to clean the rust spots off, with the grips removed of course. That will clean any rust or blemishes but will not yurt the bluing one bit. With steel wool you can take bluing off if you are not real careful.
One other thing to think about is that if you refinish the steel you would have to have the grips redone as well or it would not look right. In the end, i think you would have much more money in the gun than it THEN would be worth. As is, it's still a collector. Refinished, it will always be a shooter.
Just my opinion. Beautiful gun by the way, warts and all!
|
11-15-2009, 10:21 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,990
Likes: 181
Liked 2,719 Times in 724 Posts
|
|
As the others have said, please leave that original finish as is. Task # 1 is to assure that the rust is arrested and you have good advice on doing that.
I really doubt that S&W will accept that gun to refinish. If by some quirk they might take it and refinish it, you may get it back with a laser etched logo on the side ...at the very best, the finish will stand out like someone trying to pass a Prius off as a Dusenburg. Any one who knows the difference will be able to see it a block away.
Bob
|
11-15-2009, 10:21 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,829
Likes: 18,651
Liked 22,477 Times in 8,296 Posts
|
|
A good cleaning, like DCWilson advised, and then coat with Renaissance Wax. Recoat with Wax after every cleaning.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
11-15-2009, 01:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 2,515
Liked 1,682 Times in 703 Posts
|
|
NO to refinishing. If you are going to shoot it, I'd use a soft patch soaked in Breakfree & rub the whole thing down.
If you are going to wax it, then you would have to remove the oil, I think.
Russ
|
05-25-2016, 01:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 3,979
Liked 2,918 Times in 803 Posts
|
|
Yes, there is a cut off date before which Smith will not accept a firearm for refinishing but I'm not sure what it is. When I sent my 1963 Mod 36 back for refinishing last year I was told I just made the cut off. A person at customer service told me it was because they don't have parts for many of the old firearms and, as you know, they don't like to ship a firearm back with bad parts in it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-25-2016, 03:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 113
Likes: 770
Liked 329 Times in 75 Posts
|
|
I guess my opinion won't matter much as I'm not a collector, just an accumulator of older firearms that have been used but not abused and acquire that old patina that comes with age. I would never remove it's character with a refinish. What the other folks said about a good soaking in Kroil, oil it and use Ren Wax. So I vote no. That's a vey nice old Smith. Rich
__________________
GOD BLESS THE USA
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-25-2016, 03:43 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Twin Cities
Posts: 2,355
Likes: 4,972
Liked 1,773 Times in 717 Posts
|
|
I would not refinish it but it isn't my gun. I do not believe Smith will work on revolvers that do not have model markings due to a lack of spare parts should they find something needing replacement.
YIKES 7 YEAR OLD ZOMBIE THREAD!
Last edited by usm1rifle; 05-25-2016 at 03:47 PM.
Reason: ZOMBIE THREAD
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-25-2016, 03:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,721
Likes: 247
Liked 29,294 Times in 14,152 Posts
|
|
Does everyone know this thread is from nearly 7 years ago?
|
05-25-2016, 07:16 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,603
Likes: 3,716
Liked 8,968 Times in 3,560 Posts
|
|
I voted NO 7 years ago. So where is the gun today? Was it ever refinished? Photos please.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-25-2016, 07:51 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 7,970
Liked 4,671 Times in 1,606 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog
I would vote no on a refinish. A professional redo would make it look nicer but in my opinion would not add, or might even subtract, from its collector value. If the brown areas in the photos are rust, I would try to remove them so they don't go deeper into the metal, but that would be it.
|
IMHO, I'd advise NOT to refinish. The way it is now it just wreaks of reality and surely genuine. No story needed with this one because it talks as tells all, exactly as it is now.
Good luck with that, you'll love it.
Would you mind sharing the serial number with us? (unless it's already posted and I missed it). There are a bunch of us that keep track of the serial numbers and configuration / sights etc.
__________________
ANTIQUESMITHS
LM1300 SWHF425
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-26-2016, 01:19 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: trail's end in ol' Wyo
Posts: 7,278
Likes: 17,552
Liked 18,511 Times in 5,072 Posts
|
|
Thanks, OldChief, for bringing this back to the light of day.
I picked up K22 sn K27XX this afternoon (some of you might have seen my post from a few days ago) so this thread has significant, timely meaning to me. It's a LERK and probably from 1947.
The gun's undergone its first cleaning (by me). I found a very small bit of rust under the grips on the grip frame faces (no mention of that by the seller). I'll employ the tactics suggested here to arrest that.
I knew it had some blue ware, and it's actually not disappointing compared to the seller's description. I wish he hadn't used a home remedy to try to "fix" some of the blue ware on the cylinder. I'll probably be able to undo that with some bronze wool.
I had considered a factory redo (re-blue) when I first saw the gun this afternoon. Thanks to this old thread I'll be happy to have a great shooter, which is what I wanted. The action's incredible as is the gun's fit.
So after all this time and my experience today, don't refinish the gun.
__________________
Wrangler of stray Chiefs
Bob
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-31-2016, 06:37 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 1,279
Liked 3,345 Times in 570 Posts
|
|
Common sense prevailed
Quote:
I voted NO 7 years ago. So where is the gun today? Was it ever refinished? Photos please.
|
No, it was never refinished I realized that it being an original survivor, 1 of 1067, was more important than it looking "pretty" with a fresh paint job. For what I paid back then, and considering that the magnas are actually numbered (rarely seen on K22/40s) I am happy to own it, despite the condition.
Here is a thread about its birthday a few years back...
Happy 73rd Birthday K-22 - 5-24-40
__________________
}-----Jim----->
~SWCA #2732~
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-31-2016, 06:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,271
Likes: 20,321
Liked 13,165 Times in 4,194 Posts
|
|
Your revolver's value is based on its provenance, not it's appearance
Leave it alone.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|