|
|
|
12-07-2009, 08:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 627
Likes: 132
Liked 564 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
A Myth?
Not exactly sure where to put this. I hang out here most of the time, so here goes.
I have been shooting handguns since the '60's. I owned a few Smiths to include a 27-2 and a 29-2 in the '70's. In those times, I was a college student and later a teacher. As you know neither usually has a lot of money. I always wanted a Colt Python. In the days when a Model 29 cost almost $400 a Python cost upwards of $700 and I could never afford one. Well, day before yesterday, I got the deal of a lifetime on the "Rolls Royce" of handguns with an action that is "smooth as glass". A 6" royal blue ventilated ribbed beauty. I had never fired one till then. My first impression was the action was strange. Good, but strange, in that although smooth in double action, it seems to change pull weight as the trigger is depressed. I brought it home and took out my old 4 screw Model 28. When I compared the action, and the trigger break, I have to say, the old 28 seems to have the Python beat both in single and double action. My 1957 Pre 29 has it beat all to you know what. Once again, I think I have been right about what the best revolvers ever made were. Any thoughts?
|
12-07-2009, 08:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Homewood AL
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Smith and Wesson better than a C***?? Like Duh!!
|
12-07-2009, 09:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: western Connecticut
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 13,079
Liked 2,901 Times in 932 Posts
|
|
I've had a 6"blue ,4"blue and a 4"stainless Python and I got rid of them all I'll take a Smith & Wesson action any time !!!!Tho I do have a soft spot for Colt Detective Special's and Cobra's also Colt 1911's.
|
12-07-2009, 09:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Bay, CA.
Posts: 205
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
I've never owned a Python, but the ones I've handled were very beautifully made guns. It has always been my opinion that Smith has always had Colt beat as far as triggers go. The Pythons have a huge following but when it comes down to it, (this'll rile up the Colt guys!!) a Python is just a glorified Official Police (of which I own several).
|
12-07-2009, 09:16 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,412 Times in 3,291 Posts
|
|
This topic comes up quite often. The Python and the M27 are the top of their respective lines but they are very different revolvers. The Colt action definitely "stacks" and to some it feels as though the trigger pull gets heavier as it is pulled. May be, but in actually checking the weight of the pull on my Pythons (I currently have 3) they are no heavier than my Smiths (indeed, they are lighter than most of my S&Ws). I think it's a matter of perception.
Colt fans swear the Colt action is better and S&W devotees stand by their favorites. I have both, love them all, and would feel naked without at least Python hanging around the farm. Wish I had one more, a 6" nickel version. But I have suspended gun buying for the duration (of paying off the mortgage) and even if I was looking, the current prices put me off. I have a total of $1,200 invested in all three of my Pythons. Can't hardly buy even one for that much today.
Mine:
An alternative to the Python is the early (pre-1970) Trooper. Same action, just lacks the heavy vented barrel. I got the well used one at the bottom for $200 and paid $400 for the better one which was a great deal because those early target stocks in good shape fetch $200+ by themselves.
I'll match the trigger on this worn-looking Colt against any S&W (and bear in mind the guy saying this owns and shoots 7 M27s and 1 Registered Magnum so he knows what a good S&W feels like). Gun looks sad but shoots great.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
12-07-2009, 09:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 374
Likes: 99
Liked 226 Times in 98 Posts
|
|
I own both N-frame S&W revolvers and Colt Pythons. I am much more comfortable with a Model 27 than with the Colt . The S&W just feels better in my hand.
I'll admit my 1966 Python with its factory wood is a very pretty gun, and like bob I have a place in my heart for the D-frame Colts.
|
12-07-2009, 09:30 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I'm here, you're not
Posts: 2,957
Likes: 143
Liked 652 Times in 226 Posts
|
|
I find the actions on S&W's to be more consistent from gun to gun. Pythons are all over the place with some being only so so and not as nice as a S&W and some being very good. The one I keep available to shoot is quite excellent.
__________________
Lynnie, Professional Pest
|
12-07-2009, 09:41 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,242 Times in 1,100 Posts
|
|
I'd put the trigger on my 29-3 (and others) against even a Custom Shop Python any day. Python guts also will not hold up as good for as long as a Smith.
|
12-07-2009, 09:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,423
Likes: 10,441
Liked 28,254 Times in 5,277 Posts
|
|
I am like the OP. I always dreamed of owning a Python but couldn't afford one. Well that hasn't changed, but I am perfectly happy with the Smiths I had do learn to love and respect.
I think the Python is a beautiful firearm, but I growed up and old with S&W's so I reckon I'll just be satisfied with them
Last edited by Iggy; 12-07-2009 at 10:07 PM.
|
12-07-2009, 10:13 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Beach Side West Florida
Posts: 12,332
Likes: 26,884
Liked 19,439 Times in 4,095 Posts
|
|
|
12-07-2009, 10:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
I have a Python with a really fine original, unmolested action but like Model 27s best of all.
I love the balance and the trigger of the Model 27. Perhaps its a matter of long familiarity with Smith & Wesson revolvers that makes it my favorite rather than the Python.
I do think that perhaps the Python is not quite as fragile as is sometimes claimed.
|
12-07-2009, 11:27 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 13,059
Likes: 2,547
Liked 7,201 Times in 3,064 Posts
|
|
My experience is almost the same as saxon pigs. I own two pythons, carried a colt trooper many years, also still own two troopers. I have a 27-2 I bought new in the early 70s, plus many other smiths. So I definetly aint prejudice. I will say I belive my pythons or troopers are slightly more accurate than smiths if shot braced off the bench. I feel that is due to a tapered bore and a solid clyinder lockup at hammer fall. The triggers can be argued either way by which ever you were raised on. To me the trigger differance isnt that important as 99.5% of my shooting is single action since I dont have to requalify anymore.
I have a 2 1/2" python that seems to think it is a 6". I also have a 4" that I really havent shot all that much. On that one the front sight seems too wide in relationship to the rear notch.-Can hardly see light on the sides. Both brands are great!
|
12-08-2009, 12:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
|
|
I had a very good friend who passed away and he had a mint Python and I always lusted after it. In the end his family decided to keep it and then I started buying S&W's and I have to say I love the N frames with the Model 27 being the best in looks to me and I've long forgotten the Phyton.
|
12-08-2009, 12:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 8
Liked 64 Times in 40 Posts
|
|
my father-in-law has a Python that I had in my greedy little hands for a while, and has a fantastic action. It does feel different in DA than a S&W, that's for sure. The SA pull on my 686 is every bit as good (from what I remember). I'd like to take the two of them out together and try them at the same time to compare.
|
12-08-2009, 12:30 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Well, I've never fired a Colt Python but I did own one about 12 or 15 years ago. It was a 4" barreled, blued finish. I do a lot more collecting than I ever do shooting, but I do know this much. That Python had the tightest lockup of ANY GUN I EVER OWNED. It was like a fine watch built on roller bearings and reminded me of a quality no longer available today at any arms manufacturer. You know how you can test drive a car for the first time and tell the difference between a Yugo and a Mercedes Benz? The Python had that type of quality.
Now, with that said, I can also say I owned a Smith & Wesson Model 27-2 around the same time and it was no slouch itself. But, strictly speaking for myself, that Colt Python was one magnificent handgun. At least in my opinion.
|
12-08-2009, 12:45 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Back home, for now
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 2,997
Liked 3,663 Times in 618 Posts
|
|
During the 80's and early 90's I shot PPC with the LAPD team. Some of that time I worked the Academy, so I shot daily. I had 2 Pythons that were my 6" service-class revolvers. I was one of the VERY few competitive PPC shooters in Southern Cal who shot a Python in the distinguished matches. At the time I was shooting 35,000 rds in practice a year, of which 10-12,000 was service revolver. Harry Davis, one of the best of the LAPD armorers, worked on my Colts. Both guns needed re-timing yearly. One broke a firing pin 2 years after purchase. Both had "Tedford" $150.00 factory action jobs that removed the famous Colt stacking. Despite these issues, the Python, when equipped with Elliason sights, was a superior target revolver. But just like a hot girlfriend, it was high maintenance. If you have revolversmith close by that knows Colts and will work on them for free (like I did), it's awesome. The 6" 586 or 686 S&W, when equipped with the special-order "tall sights" (for a neck hold), were more rugged and were excellent revolvers. But the Python was exceptionally accurate at 50 yards, especially with good factory wadcutters or ball. I now have one Python (a 6" stainless), set up like my old Colt PPC revolvers, as my target/practice revolver. It will easily shoot 12-shot 2" or less groups at 50 yards (from a Ransom Rest) with selected factory wadcutters. I love Smiths, but I'll always have a Python around.
Bob
|
12-08-2009, 02:28 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 61N149W
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1,426
Liked 1,104 Times in 550 Posts
|
|
Python vs. S&W ???
Well....,Lets see............,I had a 4" 1968 vintage Python(blue) that I purchased at a gun show here in Alaska for a really good price. I cleaned it (and did it need it!!) then went out and shot it. What a great revolver. The Mark V action is smooth. A year or so later, a guy offered me crazy money for it and I let it go. Kinda wish I held on to it. Some time later that summer, I found my best friends dream gun, a 3 1/2" mod. 27(blue) in the case all original and correct for $400.00. It kicked me in the gut to not keep it for myself, but he is my best friend. This little beast is awesome. Since then, family stuff came up and he had to take cash in a pinch for it so I missed out. So much for his dream gun..., but it is family. I'm still lookin' for a deal right along with the rest of you, but I'll let a Python go if there is a S&W 27 anywhere near. I think I'll agree about the Colt trigger "stacking". Can't say I've had or seen a S&W with that issue. Oh well...............get 'hold of Mythbusters...............Sprefix
__________________
Go big or stay home
|
12-08-2009, 07:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Eastern TN USA
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
I've owned and heavily used S&W revolvers for over 30 years. However, the Python has always been a gun that I lusted after.. I've shot a few, and they are fine handguns, but then and now, overpriced. I don't know if I'll ever get one, but If I don't, my L-Frames will do nicely.
|
12-08-2009, 08:03 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW Ga.
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 2,250
Liked 680 Times in 220 Posts
|
|
I have one just to say I got one.It's a real pretty gun but all it does is sit in the safe.
|
12-08-2009, 08:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NE ohio
Posts: 314
Likes: 14
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
As a 16 year old kid I was allowed to buy - well pay for dad had to "buy it" for me my first real gun. Dad reloaded and we had .22's 357 and 45's He encouraged me to buy a 357 since we reloaded. I had to choose... hmmm S&W 19,28,27 or the Colt Python.
I chose the colt... and I put many thousands of rounds through it. Most of them lead target rounds/SWC
It literally shot knots at 25 yards. I don't beat on her and I do shoot my smiths which came after the big snake over the years but I still like ta shoot it.
The lock up on a well timed colt python is awesome with NO side to side play as with most other revolvers. I contemplate selling her every now n again since they are worth so much but can't "pull the trigger" so to speak...
|
12-08-2009, 12:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,123
Likes: 27,957
Liked 33,926 Times in 5,296 Posts
|
|
I've owned two, and I still have this one:
I prefer the Smith double action, but this Python has a fantastic single action pull, and has been noted before it locks up like a bank vault. Its very accurate and I think it just looks right. I'd like to find a six inch sometime, but the prices have gotten ludicrous, so this will probably be my only one. My oldest boy will probably jump over my cooling corpse to get that Python before his little brother can snag it out of the safe.
__________________
“What you got, ain’t new.”
|
12-08-2009, 12:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
The only experience that I ever had with a Python was years ago. It belonged to a buddy who was a real Python/Colt nut. He really new how to rework the trigger mechanisms on a Colt, and I had the chance to compare a "before and after" trigger job that he did on a Python. The before was "ok" but nothing to rave about...the "after" was absolutely splendid!!!! He had done trigger jobs on other revolvers, and he told me, that Smiths are easy to work with...and they are, but, he said that the mechanism of the Colt required much painstaking work and a great deal of time to achieve an ideal trigger. I guess that is why I always preferred Smith revolvers. I had the opportunity to shoot that Python, and while there is no doubt that it was top of the line, and very accurate, I was never that enthused about getting one, when the price of the Smith was more affordable to a young guy with a family.
|
12-11-2009, 01:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northern Lower Michigan
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
I'm an S&W guy but I've owned at least two or three of everything and anything worthwhile over the years.
Here's the BEST Python I've ever seen let alone owned:
It is a 2 1/2" that was made in 1964 and that makes a HUGE difference between it and Pythons of later manufacture.
These early Pythons were miles beyond the later guns as far as fit, finish, the smoothness of the triggers and accuracy.
This one is un-fired except at factory test and it will remain so while in my possession. (Shameless Plug I have this one up for sale on GunBroker right now!)
I have however tested the trigger and double action and it's just like GLASS! Miles beyond even the Combat Python, (EXTREMELY RARE 3 1/2" Barrel), I own, which I have shot and is of later manufacture.
I've also owned and shot many Colt .357's (Pre- Troopers) and they are more in line with the early Pythons.
All of the Troopers and Detective Specials I've owned and shot are more like the later manufacture Pythons.
While the Colts are very smooth and very accurate there is a HUGE difference between the Colts and all of the Model 27's I've ever owned.
Here is one of my favorite Pre-27's that I feel is comparable to the 2 1/2" Python in fit and finish:
The double and single action trigger pulls on the guns are as different as night and day.
ALL Colt double actions "Stack" Even during the first pull. Not only the ALL the Python's but ALL of the .357's, Troopers and Detective Specials I've ever owned exhibit this trait. It's due to the way the gun is constructed and can't be eliminated by even the finest action job.
The Smiths double and single action may not be as "butter' smooth but it is MUCH crisper with NO "Stacking" whatsoever!
The heavy frame of the 27 also gives it a hands down accuracy advantage.
IMHO the Colt action may be smoother than the Smith but it can't compare in crispness and overall accuracy, so the Smith is the better overall of the two!
__________________
tjsguns
|
12-11-2009, 01:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 627
Likes: 132
Liked 564 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
OK, since we have a lot of C*** guys on here, I need help with my Python. This is what the serial # looks like, exactly:
ATF
98800 I-I
289
on the inside of the crane.
Am I looking at only the middle line of numerals to date the gun? Proofhouse has nothing that looks exactly like this, but they only go up to 1978. Another site went to 1985, had nothing that looked like it either and stated that if made after '85, one had to call Colt to get date of manufacture.
So, if I only look at the middle line of numerals, it was made in 1969. If the letters come into play, I guess I have a post 1985 gun and need to call Colt. Any ideas?
Oh, and I will post a pic as soon as I get the grips I bought from another member here. It has rubbers on it right now.
Last edited by phenson; 12-11-2009 at 02:04 PM.
|
12-11-2009, 01:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 152
Likes: 5
Liked 77 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
I own both a number of Smiths , mostly N frames of varying vintage, and Colts, mostly New Services. Both have their place and they are different in feel. I would really hate to have choose just one or the other. I have worked on both and will say the Colt V spring actions are more complicated to do properly than the Smiths. This is the one Python I own after many years of lusting after one. I am a lousy photographer and the picture really doesn't look as good as the gun really is. As originally purchased it was finished in Armaloy, had Pachmayr rubber and a very badly screwed up action. Whatever idiot tried to do a trigger job screwed the hammer notch up so badly it was horribly out of time. This is the end result after getting the Armaloy stripped,replacing and fitting some new parts, making grips and a careful hand polish and reblue.
|
12-11-2009, 02:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I have a 60 something Python (either 67 or 64 -- I forget.) It's a lovely gun -- the grip shape of a colt seems odd to me, but I keep it around. I've dry-fired a Colt Custom shop trigger on a Python, and that was fantastic. But, I prefer the trigger on my Patrolman to the stock Python trigger.
|
12-12-2009, 02:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 152
Likes: 5
Liked 77 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Phenson. What you apparently have is an ATF issued serial number. Probably the original serial number was damaged and ATF specified a number to replace the original. I have a 600 Remington that came into my possession, overpolished and slightly rusty, that only part of the original serial could be read on. After contacting ATF, they specified a serial number I could restamp on the receiver. The format is what you have posted. I.E. ATF-XXXXX-XXX.
|
12-12-2009, 03:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 627
Likes: 132
Liked 564 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wlmccann
Phenson. What you apparently have is an ATF issued serial number. Probably the original serial number was damaged and ATF specified a number to replace the original. I have a 600 Remington that came into my possession, overpolished and slightly rusty, that only part of the original serial could be read on. After contacting ATF, they specified a serial number I could restamp on the receiver. The format is what you have posted. I.E. ATF-XXXXX-XXX.
|
Interesting. I'm almost certain the gun is not refinished, there is absolutely no damage anywhere else, and it does not look to have been stamped over. I did kinda wonder about the initials ATF when I looked. Now, I am really curious about this gun. I can't find any Colt folks to discuss it with, and not sure it would be appropriate to do so here. Wonder where I could go?
|
12-12-2009, 03:18 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: HoosieRama
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 2,396
Liked 3,853 Times in 1,401 Posts
|
|
Pat - join the Colt Forum and post your pic with serial number question
ColtForum - Powered by vBulletin
|
12-12-2009, 03:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,755
Likes: 1,643
Liked 9,160 Times in 3,384 Posts
|
|
RE; ATF ser#....I worked on a Colt SAA, an old 1st generation revolver, that had been stolen from the owner 10yrs prior to that. It was recovered with the serial numbers(s) filed on and hacked over. But betw the numerous serial number locations on the gun, L/E was able to put together an entire ser#, run it NCIC and find it was reported stolen and eventually return it to the owner.
Before it was returned, instead of the ATF allowing the original number to be remarked on the gun, they insisted that an 'ATF' ser# as described in the above post be stamped in the gun. That became the legal ser# of the firearm. This was in the '80's.
Don't know if ATF was involved in a criminal case with the gun as evidence, or how they came to insist on the ATF ser# be stamped on the gun. Perhaps the simple fact of the obliterated serial# called them in on it.
|
12-12-2009, 03:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MANNING SC
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
S&W
I will take my mod 10 bull over any colt.and my wife mod 10 bull.her mod 28 aint any slouch either.all are older made.
|
12-12-2009, 07:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 627
Likes: 132
Liked 564 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VM
|
Thanks,
Mike
|
12-12-2009, 07:54 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 845
Liked 898 Times in 488 Posts
|
|
i'm glad we have so many people that feel pythons are not as good as smiths, don't have the right trigger pull, feel they are over-priced, whatever. leaves more for me. for those who think the pythons are over-priced, how do you feel about what a nice 5-screw 44 mag costs these days?
|
12-12-2009, 08:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Anybody here ever own a KORTH...made in Kraut land... they have been in biz since the early 50's and make 100 guns a year. All handmade out of a billet of speciall steel. Tkes about four months to make one. Last price check now get this $12,000.00 USD. Their production has recently taken a downturn as 2 of their LONG term employees retire..both were in their late 80's.
|
12-12-2009, 08:22 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 845
Liked 898 Times in 488 Posts
|
|
never owned one but shot 3 different ones. the triggers are unlike anything every experienced. they are on roller bearings,talk about smooooth.
|
12-13-2009, 10:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 627
Likes: 132
Liked 564 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
If anyone is interested, here's what I have gotten so far over on the Colt forum:
From time to time pistols turn up with ATF stamps but no signs of an original number being obliterated.
I suspect that these were made for the ATF with a special serial applied by a factory.
You might call Colt and ask about this. They will tell you a production date over the phone on a standard gun, but they may also be willing to tell you if this was done at Colt.
Update: I called Colt this morning and they could not trace the gun with this serial # or give me any history on it. They suggested I call the ATF. I did. I was passed from one extension to the other for about 45 minutes and talked to about 8 different people. No one seemed to know anything about this. Amazing.
Last edited by phenson; 12-14-2009 at 12:17 PM.
|
12-17-2009, 05:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 58
Likes: 16
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
colt/smith
I have owned only 4 pythons, 2 old model troopers, and 6 Diamond Backs. I have owned many more s&w N's, L's & K's. IMHO the N's have better actions and are better if being fired "offhand". The Pythons are more accurate if fired from a rest. A few of the old time shooters shot as well as a rest, so they shot pythons for the extra accuracy. For many of us the S&W action let us shoot DA better because we did not shoot well with the colt "stack" when we tried fast DA.
My .02
Doc
|
12-17-2009, 06:35 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Absurdistan
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 445
Liked 154 Times in 84 Posts
|
|
I always wanted a Colt Python. My dad had one when I was a kid and sold it before I got to shoot it. Hence, I grew up on nothing but S&W revolvers.
When I finally got the chance to shoot one...I hated the thing!! I just could not get used to that Colt trigger. Thank God I didn't blow the cash on a Python before I got to shoot one. Of course I could have resold the thing easily but it sure would have been a big let down to spend money and be that disappointed in the interim.
|
12-17-2009, 07:59 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I'm here, you're not
Posts: 2,957
Likes: 143
Liked 652 Times in 226 Posts
|
|
Pythons are nice to look for, especially if you have a gun addiction anyway. Always hand inspect one prior to purchase.
The way to sort of get around the so called delicate lock work is to keep the hand and the ratchet well lubricated. The nature of the design lends itself to wear on the ratchet and the second stage of the hand. Any fore/aft play in the cylinder adds to the problem. I enjoy shooting mine but I also keep Pythons and similar Colt double actions well lubed. (I learned this a few guns too late)
The double action trigger pull can be tuned a good bit through adjustment of the V spring it uses.
__________________
Lynnie, Professional Pest
|
12-17-2009, 08:11 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
"...keep the hand and the ratchet well lubricated."
Thanks Joni Lynn for that bit of wisdom.
I don't have extensive experience with Colt revolvers and haven't subjected them to hard use but I've long suspected that proper cleaning and lubrication goes far to keep the classic Colt double actions from "being all delicate" and wearing.
You've provided a bit of validation.
|
12-17-2009, 09:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 27
Liked 63 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
I have only cycled 1 Python action and it was smooth. Almost as smooth as my 1981 Model 27.
__________________
jj
|
12-17-2009, 10:07 PM
|
|
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 2,242
Liked 1,383 Times in 254 Posts
|
|
The shop I take gun pictures for bought a nice collection of Pythons recently. This Nickle 6" has the smoothest double action or single action trigger I have ever felt. Smooth as butter. I almost bought it, but I couldnt find any Pearl steerhead grips for it
|
12-18-2009, 12:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjsguns
ALL Colt double actions "Stack" Even during the first pull. Not only the ALL the Python's but ALL of the .357's, Troopers and Detective Specials I've ever owned exhibit this trait. It's due to the way the gun is constructed and can't be eliminated by even the finest action job.
The heavy frame of the 27 also gives it a hands down accuracy advantage.
IMHO the Colt action may be smoother than the Smith but it can't compare in crispness and overall accuracy, so the Smith is the better overall of the two!
|
Not all Colt double actions stack. Not all of them have the same type of action. The stacking can be removed by a gunsmith that knows what he is doing. This has been beat to death on the Colt forum.
Colt barrels have always had the reputation of being the most accurate. Some say that it is due to the tapered bore. That's why gunsmiths used to put Python barrels on S&Ws and Rugers. Never heard of it being the other way around.
|
12-18-2009, 12:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Python- Trooper actions
If you never shot one tuned by the late Reeves Junkind or Moran from Michigan you don"t know what your missing. Not one speck of stacking, a smooth very consistant pull.
|
12-18-2009, 01:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
12-18-2009, 02:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 471
Likes: 2
Liked 59 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
I've owned a few colts (357, Trooper, Cowboy) and shot quite a few, including a few Pythons. I had a friend who worked for Colt at their CT factory in the early 80's, and he seemed to buy a new Colt each month (he was 30 and lived with his parents). I could never get used to the Colt trigger stack. I seldom shoot a DA revolver in the single action mode. I am more accurate shooting DA. If I want to shoot SA, I pick up a single action revolver, but it feels to me like a completely different skill set to shoot a DA vs a SA. I think Smith revolvers generally have Colt revolvers beat in the DA category. I can shoot DA all day long with a Smith and everythings fine. If I pick up a Colt DA, I notice my trigger finger gets fatigued after a few hundred rounds, so there must be a difference somewhere.
I've shot Ruger, Taurus, Dan Wesson, Colt, Smith & Wesson, Rossi, H&R, and Charter Arms, and I prefer the trigger on a Smith over any of the others. By the way, I didn't pick up a S&W until I had been shooting for 20 years or more, so it isn't a nostalgic preference. I tried everything else, and feel like I finally settled for what works the best (for me). I wouldn't say Smiths are the most accurate, but I think an older S&W revolver can't be beat for DA trigger pull. Consistent, predictable, smooth, and uniform through-out the pull.
Unlike many, I don't like the trigger to suprise me when it "snaps like a glass rod". DA shooting, for me, is a combination of timing the trigger pull thru it's full stroke with aligning the sights at the point of hammer fall. Dry firing is fine, holding the sight picture like a rock, but a gun fired at a reasonable pace requires the predictability I mention above. I don't feel like Colt's have that.
__________________
Hastings
|
12-18-2009, 04:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: las vegas, nevada
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 29aholic
I'd put the trigger on my 29-3 (and others) against even a Custom Shop Python any day. Python guts also will not hold up as good for as long as a Smith.
|
I am a competitive revolver shooter(IDPA,USPSA,ICORE, and steel challenge). I have been shooting the same SS Python for over 10 years with out any maint. other that cleaning. The Colts seem to hold up as well as any of the S&W guns I shoot, I put tens of thousands of rounds thru my colts. IMHO the Colt will hold as well as a S&W.
|
12-18-2009, 05:26 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 6,638
Likes: 3,151
Liked 6,368 Times in 2,494 Posts
|
|
I have a Python, an Official Police, a Diamondback, and a Police Positive Special. The triggers on all of them are very similar. The coil spring Trooper Mk III feels much better to me, but then I'm a S&W guy. Personally, I don't much like the looks of the Python. The blue on it, doesn't look any better than a 29-2. The stocks look boxy, and I have never liked that goofy vent rib, full lug barrel. I don't even care for vent ribs on shotguns. I shoot my Smiths much more than the Colt DAs. Maybe it's time I started swapping those off, for more Smiths.
__________________
Wayne
Torn & Frayed
|
12-18-2009, 10:22 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: las vegas, nevada
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wbraswell
I have a Python, an Official Police, a Diamondback, and a Police Positive Special. The triggers on all of them are very similar. The coil spring Trooper Mk III feels much better to me, but then I'm a S&W guy. Personally, I don't much like the looks of the Python. The blue on it, doesn't look any better than a 29-2. The stocks look boxy, and I have never liked that goofy vent rib, full lug barrel. I don't even care for vent ribs on shotguns. I shoot my Smiths much more than the Colt DAs. Maybe it's time I started swapping those off, for more Smiths.
|
I have a bunch of Smiths that I would trade for colts.
|
12-18-2009, 10:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Paul (smokey!) MN
Posts: 5,370
Likes: 1,476
Liked 6,754 Times in 2,591 Posts
|
|
I wouldn't mind owning a Python, except that the only shop that I've been able to find one in wants over $2000 for it.
__________________
Common sense isn't so common.
|
|
|
Tags
|
586, 686, anaconda, colt, dan wesson, detective, idpa, lock, m27, m65, model 25, model 27, model 65, model 66, n-frame, patrolman, police positive special, ppc, registered magnum, s&w, saa, trooper, wwii |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|