|
|
12-14-2010, 11:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 541
Likes: 928
Liked 328 Times in 150 Posts
|
|
S&W 38-44 heavy duty
I saw what I believed to be a 38-44 heavy duty, 4"bbl, blue, chambered in .38special at a friend's home tonight.
It had a humpback hammer, fixed sights with half moon front blade, ejector shroud, last patent date was 1914 (top of barrel), five digit numerical serial number, five screw frame. Very few freckles, couple holster rubs on the blue finish. Seemed to lockup nicely. Light single action, smooth DA.
How rare are these old gals?
No photos - my bad.
Last edited by 03clyde; 12-15-2010 at 12:05 AM.
Reason: hammer - not trigger!!
|
12-14-2010, 11:59 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,997
Likes: 5,008
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
I think you meant humpback hammer rather than trigger, but even so there is room for confusion about hammer shape because the prewar N-frame hammer had a kind of "humpy" look to it that allows it to be misidentified on occasion.
There were about 11000 HDs made in the 1930s before wartime contracts took them out of production, so you can't call them rare. But the demand for them is high, and 11000 won't go very far when everybody wants one (or two, or three, or...). So they command high prices even when well worn, and very high prices when in near-new condition.
Those of us who have one or more of these massive old fixed-sight .38s just love them. I think the five-inch barrels were most common among the prewar guns, but four-inch and 6.5-inch barrels were also available. They were produced after WWII as well, but it doesn't sound like you have one of those. Postwar guns had an S prefix to the serial number.
__________________
David Wilson
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-15-2010, 10:38 AM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Well, if it is a 4" barrel with patent dates on top of the barrel, then the barrel has been cut as the 4" barrels did not have any address/patent info on the top of the barrels as there was not room to roll them. The 4 and 6.5" HDs are more scarce than the 5" guns are. You did not indicate if the gun has service grips or magnas. The serial number would help date it. Like Dave said, the hammer can be confusing as I first thought the regular pre war style hammer was a humpback until someone showed one to me.
Hope this helps,
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
12-15-2010, 11:18 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 541
Likes: 928
Liked 328 Times in 150 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Aspenhill
Well, if it is a 4" barrel with patent dates on top of the barrel, then the barrel has been cut as the 4" barrels did not have any address/patent info on the top of the barrels as there was not room to roll them. The 4 and 6.5" HDs are more scarce than the 5" guns are. You did not indicate if the gun has service grips or magnas. The serial number would help date it. Like Dave said, the hammer can be confusing as I first thought the regular pre war style hammer was a humpback until someone showed one to me.
Hope this helps,
Bill
|
Thanks all -
The lettering on the barrel consisted of two lines of printing with three patent dates on the second line (ending with the 1914 date) - the markings seem evenly spaced between the rear of the front blade sight and leading edge of the frame and did not, at first inspection, seem like a shortened barrel.
Can't tell you which grips were on the gun. These were wooden, checkered with the silver medallions at almost the very top of the grip panel.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-15-2010, 12:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,997
Likes: 5,008
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
If you measured the barrel from the muzzle to the leading edge of the frame, you might think it was a four-inch barrel. But you should measure from the muzzle to the face of the cylinder. I'm wondering if the gun you saw was actually a five-inch barrel. That would leave room for the full patent date rollmark. (I should have thought of that in the first place, and I'm glad Bill caught it and brought it up for discussion.)
Those sound like service grips to me.
Just for discussion, here's a well used 5" prewar HD (shipped 1932) with service grips: did the gun look like this?
This is a humpback hammer installed on a different .38/44 with adjustable sights.
__________________
David Wilson
Last edited by DCWilson; 12-15-2010 at 12:26 PM.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-15-2010, 01:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 541
Likes: 928
Liked 328 Times in 150 Posts
|
|
Top picture - same grips. Five inch barrel too - I remember remarking about the depth of the forcing cone and the noticeable gap below it between the front cylinder edge and the rear edge of the frame. I'll try to get all/most of the serial number.
|
12-15-2010, 01:31 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
which hammer does your gun have?
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
12-15-2010, 02:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 541
Likes: 928
Liked 328 Times in 150 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Aspenhill
which hammer does your gun have?
|
In the two photos provided by Mr. Wilson, the hammers appear different from each other. The hammer on gun in the top picture is what is on this gun - the serial number is 477XX.
|
12-15-2010, 04:26 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,997
Likes: 5,008
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
That serial number points to a 1936 ship date for the gun. The humpback hammer became available as an option about a year later (though of course it could have been easily installed later in a Heavy Duty .38/44 already in use).
__________________
David Wilson
|
01-20-2017, 01:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: South Texas, Duval co
Posts: 111
Likes: 112
Liked 351 Times in 64 Posts
|
|
Traded into this 38/44 HD, just sharing. It has been factory refinished sometime in '72
Last edited by s&wchad; 01-20-2017 at 02:27 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-20-2017, 01:46 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,225
Likes: 34,871
Liked 10,792 Times in 3,677 Posts
|
|
If you are going to XX out the SN, you might want to do it on the letter.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-20-2017, 04:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Woods and Lakes
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 512
Liked 1,501 Times in 442 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sodapop69
Traded into this 38/44 HD, just sharing. It has been factory refinished sometime in '72
|
Wow - according to that first photo, your gun has the extremely rare "floating front sight" and the almost-never-seen "cantilevered top strap" options.
__________________
Do or do not. There is no try.
|
01-21-2017, 08:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Chesterfield, Va.
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 8,936
Liked 13,323 Times in 3,303 Posts
|
|
I don't really know why I picked this one up a few months ago. I'm sure I bought it too early, but it was in such nice shape, and I'm a sucker for diamond Magna grips. The fact that it had the box with it didn't hurt. I have been told the serial number (S-64496) indicates 1946, so it must have been fairly soon after the return to civilian production.
I don't think it's been fired outside the factory, but there is no way to prove that. If it has it wasn't very often, and I haven't fired it yet. Haven't decided if I'm going to or not.
__________________
John 3:16 .
|
The Following 13 Users Like Post:
|
19leben, bananaman, CptCurl, DCWilson, deanodog, Gardner11, j38, ki5mc, Kinman, kryten67, MCorps0311, SAFireman, Wiregrassguy |
01-21-2017, 03:08 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,210
Likes: 6,430
Liked 9,646 Times in 1,800 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
If you are going to XX out the SN, you might want to do it on the letter.
|
Or on the stocks also
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Kris
OGCA, NRA LM
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-21-2017, 08:28 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Derby City,Ky.
Posts: 4,675
Likes: 5,277
Liked 3,504 Times in 1,680 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CajunBass
I don't really know why I picked this one up a few months ago. I'm sure I bought it too early, but it was in such nice shape, and I'm a sucker for diamond Magna grips. The fact that it had the box with it didn't hurt. I have been told the serial number (S-64496) indicates 1946, so it must have been fairly soon after the return to civilian production.
I don't think it's been fired outside the factory, but there is no way to prove that. If it has it wasn't very often, and I haven't fired it yet. Haven't decided if I'm going to or not.
|
You said it might never have been fired outside of the factory,and as old as it is,that a treasure in my mind's thinking. And it's a beautiful revolver. Thanks for sharing!
__________________
Life is short,live it fully.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-23-2017, 01:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: South Texas, Duval co
Posts: 111
Likes: 112
Liked 351 Times in 64 Posts
|
|
Pls explain for the lay person, floating sight & cantilevered ?
TIA
|
01-23-2017, 07:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,651
Likes: 244
Liked 29,163 Times in 14,101 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CajunBass
I don't really know why I picked this one up a few months ago. I'm sure I bought it too early, but it was in such nice shape, and I'm a sucker for diamond Magna grips. The fact that it had the box with it didn't hurt. I have been told the serial number (S-64496) indicates 1946, so it must have been fairly soon after the return to civilian production.
|
The closest SN I list to S64496 is S636xx shipping in 7/46. But I also show two lower SNs as shipping in 1947. Allegedly, S62486 was the first N-frame made after the end of WWII. Yours could have shopped in either 1946 or 1947.
Last edited by DWalt; 01-23-2017 at 07:01 PM.
|
01-24-2017, 01:02 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 3,609
Liked 2,016 Times in 535 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sodapop69
Pls explain for the lay person, floating sight & cantilevered ?
TIA
|
He was joking. If you look at your pics again, you can see the red reflection from the surrounding area, and it's making the front sight look as if it's floating above the barrel, and the top strap looks like it's not connected toward the front, above the barrel/cylinder gap, thus, cantilevered.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|