Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2011, 12:59 AM
iskra iskra is offline
Member
My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'Beachy' SoCal
Posts: 522
Likes: 12
Liked 761 Times in 280 Posts
Default My Transitional N Frames & Questions

I recently acquired the S&W 38/44 Transition Target model shown in the below photos. The hammer has been modified to a pseudo target configuration and it presently wears a trigger shoe. Otherwise I would rate the gun about 95%, this accounting for some blue wear at the muzzle. I seldom look at modified guns, but I have a soft spot for the N frame postwar transitions. At about $600 OTD, it wasn’t a great deal, but it seemed sufficiently uncommon and a potentially restorable specimen. The trigger shoe will come off as soon as I can locate a correct Allen wrench and I do have a the possibility of a good transition trigger if the shoe leaves significant marks. But I am definitely going to need a hammer and I wonder: (1) How scarce are such parts; (2) where I might best inquire and (3) how much I should expect to pay.

My last question is to the practical rarity of this target model. I differentiate ‘practical rarity' as may be suggested by knowledgeable members here, from the statistical rarity based strictly upon production numbers.

For interest, my other transitional N Models are listed below. Except as noted, all are original and in excellent condition or better. ( * previously presented photos in a prior post to this forum.)
Thanks for any information.

My Transitional N Frames:
45 Model of 1917 – 209xxx (non-“S”) prefix.
***
44 Target – S71xxx (*)
44 H/D 6 ½” – S63xxx (*)
44 HD 5” – S68xxx
***
38/44 Target – S71xxx (Only about 'Good')
38/44 Target – S69xxx
38/44 HD 5” – 67xxx (in photo)
38/44 HD 5” – 65xxx
38/44 HD 4” – S63xxx (in red box)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1050801 (Small).JPG (80.9 KB, 195 views)
File Type: jpg P1050805 (Small).JPG (79.6 KB, 182 views)
File Type: jpg P1050806 (Small).JPG (60.1 KB, 186 views)
File Type: jpg P1050802 (Small).JPG (52.2 KB, 150 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2011, 07:52 AM
Combat Combat is offline
US Veteran
My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW Ga.
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 2,250
Liked 680 Times in 220 Posts
Default

I was wondering, could that be a "King" hammer and could it have been shipped that way?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2011, 09:53 AM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 49
Liked 13,416 Times in 3,292 Posts
Default

I'd say $600 for an Outdoorsman was pretty damn good. I see them at $1200+ all the time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2011, 12:18 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 12,994
Likes: 5,030
Liked 7,723 Times in 2,634 Posts
Default

$600 OTD is a great deal even if you need to replace a hammer.

That looks to me like a standard hammer with a custom-widened hammer spur. King did indeed offer that service, and I imagine other shops could have done the same thing.

Maybe you can get a standard postwar long-action hammer from Poppert's Gun Parts, or Dave Chicoine, or Jack First Gun. You could also ask here in the WTB section; this is the kind of thing some forum members will have in their parts box. Remember that a prewar hammer won't function with the postwar hammer safety block, but I think it is possible to modify a prewar hammer to work with the postwar block.

Have you checked the stocks to see if they number to the gun? The profile looks wrong to me for the late 1940s, and these could have drifted in from a 1950s or even early 1960s N frame. Given the fact that the gun has a target hammer and trigger shoe, it may once have had target stocks that a previous owner kept when he let this gun move on.
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2011, 12:33 PM
rburg rburg is offline
Member
My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 7,407
Likes: 2,830
Liked 6,261 Times in 2,170 Posts
Default

Lets hear a little more about the 44 Target with the S71,000s serial number. Its almost got to be a 3rd model target, and just about as rare as hen's teeth. How long is the barrel?
__________________
Dick Burg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:37 AM
iskra iskra is offline
Member
My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'Beachy' SoCal
Posts: 522
Likes: 12
Liked 761 Times in 280 Posts
Default Belated Conclusion & Thanks!

My greatest apology for not returning sooner to my own thread! A happy matter but one of some urgency intervened. So at this point just a conclusive post concerning the comments.
Re the possibility of a King produced hammer. Room to speculate, but I doubt that the hammer is a King model. It is reasonably executed, but still looks a bit amateurish for his work.
DCWilson, Thank you for the parts suggestion. I will follow up as soon as time permits. Also kudos for being right-on concerning the grips. I finally got around to checking just tonight. The grips appear to bear the number 162991, which would place them later in time just as you suggested. What an eye! As noted above, I agree with your conclusion that the hammer is not aa bit of information concerning my 44 transition target in a new thread, so titled, momentarily.

Thanks to each respondent for the interesting thoughts, positive comments and information!!!
This is a great forum!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-21-2011, 05:26 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 18,938
Likes: 12,038
Liked 20,685 Times in 8,629 Posts
Default

I also feel that it was a great buy. The hammer is nicely executed and I'm sure a great improvement over those skinny pre war styles with fine checkering. But the lack of case colored finish is a giveaway that it wasn't done by one of the professionals, King, Micro, etc. of the time.

Their work is distinctive in shape and finish and usually marked. Here's a Micro stamped example (a little hard to make out) on my targetized 1917:
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-21-2011, 06:30 AM
bettis1's Avatar
bettis1 bettis1 is offline
US Veteran
My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 181
Liked 2,719 Times in 724 Posts
Default

I think it is a very nice Outdoorsman at a very nice price.

Since no one has raised the issue, I will take a different tact on the hammer and shoe. Those were common modifications on guns of the period and fit the shooting techniques then. I wouldn't change a thing until I shot it a little with them on it. I've got a feeling you may love it as it is. The gun represents its working life just as it is.

If I were buying it from you, I had much rather have it in the condition that the original owner had it than in some "restored" condition that you put it in.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-21-2011, 07:21 AM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 18,938
Likes: 12,038
Liked 20,685 Times in 8,629 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bettis1 View Post
I think it is a very nice Outdoorsman at a very nice price.

Since no one has raised the issue, I will take a different tact on the hammer and shoe. Those were common modifications on guns of the period and fit the shooting techniques then. I wouldn't change a thing until I shot it a little with them on it. I've got a feeling you may love it as it is. The gun represents its working life just as it is.

If I were buying it from you, I had much rather have it in the condition that the original owner had it than in some "restored" condition that you put it in.

Bob
I like that advice, even if I got replacement hammer and trigger I wouldn't install them. Just keep for the gun. I'd focus more on getting correct vintage stocks. I might dapple some Oxpho Blue on the hammer shiny spots. It can resemble case color very nicely.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-22-2011, 12:58 AM
GLL's Avatar
GLL GLL is offline
Member
My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 223
Liked 828 Times in 236 Posts
Default

Nice gun at a good price !

I would simply leave it as is and shoot it ! (Actually I would remove the trigger shoe and shoot it) ! Several of my transitional guns have modified hammers so it seemed to be a common modification.
Trying to find correct grips will be an expensive quest !

If you are willing I would very much appreciate the serial number for my files. I am also VERY interested in the .38/44 Target you listed with the S 69,000 serial number ! Do you have photos available of that gun?

[email protected]

Jerry
__________________
.38/44 Outdoorsman Accumulator
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-22-2011, 11:25 AM
linde linde is offline
US Veteran
My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions My Transitional N Frames & Questions  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ozarks of Missouri
Posts: 3,003
Likes: 3,009
Liked 2,923 Times in 992 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iskra View Post
For interest, my other transitional N Models are listed below. Except as noted, all are original and in excellent condition or better. Thanks for any information.

My Transitional N Frames:
38/44 HD 5” – 67xxx (in photo)
38/44 HD 5” – 65xxx
Being in excellent condition your 5" HDs were probably not law enforcement issue, but I would be very interested in checking the two serial numbers above to see if they were part of the 5" HDs purchased by the Missouri State Highway Patrol.

If you would, please send the serial numbers to me in a PM or email to [email protected] and I will let you know what I find.

Thanks, Russ
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
checkering, outdoorsman, postwar, prewar, sig arms, transition


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ALL SOLD! FS Transitional 1917 & Transitional 38/44 HD bengal fan GUNS - For Sale or Trade 2 01-06-2016 10:08 PM
Transitional terrier questions RussellD S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 9 05-31-2014 10:36 AM
Questions regarding 2 5screw N frames I saw today Varangi S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 01-29-2012 09:48 PM
Questions about J Frames Homechicken S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 12 09-12-2010 07:00 PM
Questions: No-lock 649? K-frames with round butts? TMann S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 5 04-09-2010 11:29 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)