Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2011, 11:30 AM
Waidmann Waidmann is offline
Member
Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
Default Question for Victory Database

What is the lowest serial number pre-V, Victory Model you have recorded.

To be most specific, U.S. Property, military finish,etc. specifically excluding commercial grade K-200 variants.

Thanks,
W.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2011, 03:16 PM
LWCmdr45 LWCmdr45 is offline
Member
Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Your stipulations make it difficult to answer your question. For example, “UNITED STATES PROPERTY” markings were not added until after the passage of the Lend-Lease Act; by definition, a “K-200” is chambered in the British .38-200 (aka, .38 Smith & Wesson), but the first martial revolvers acquired by Britain were chambered in .38 Special; and, the phosphate “military finish” did not replace the prewar blued finish until well along in production. Anyway, the database shows…

The lowest numbered example known to have been acquired by Britain was a .38 Special M&P purchased by the British Purchasing Commission: 673056.

The lowest numbered .38-200 example known is one of the “diverted South African” 4-inch models: 685087.

The lowest numbered Lend-Lease example with “UNITED STATES PROPERTY” on the top strap is a 5” .38-200 (originally blued) used by Australia: 791320.

Hope this helps!

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2011, 09:44 PM
opoefc opoefc is offline
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
Absent Comrade
Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

Steve, I notice you referenced 673056 as "acquired" by the BPC, and not "purchased" Is that because it was one of the guns supplied the British as repayment of their $1,000,000 paid for the failed Model 1940 Light Rifle contract, and S&W offered them M&Ps as credit towards the refund monies owed to the British? Ed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-05-2011, 10:56 PM
LWCmdr45 LWCmdr45 is offline
Member
Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Ed,

Actually, I *did* write "purchased by the B.P.C." However, it is my belief that the revolvers provided by S&W in lieu of the failed 9mm. "Light Rifle" were stipulated by the B.P.C. to all be chambered in the Brit's preferred .38 S&W. (These revolvers were still "purchased" by the B.P.C.; they had just PRE-paid for them!) SN 673056 may have been purchased as a "filler" while they were waiting for the .38 S&W-chambered examples to get off the production line. (SN 673056 was, BTW, a six inch barreled Target Model which was re-chambered to .38-200 on arrival in England. Talk about a weird one!) This is a time, as you know, that the Brits were buying just about *any* gun they could lay their hands on, including Single Action Army, et al., revolvers bought over the counter at gun stores.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-05-2011, 11:01 PM
Waidmann Waidmann is offline
Member
Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Thanks guys,
You have cleared this up somewhat. I have a Lend-Lease New Zealander, 954,XXX which I now gather is not remarkable to any degree.

I also have a lettered 685XXX 4 inch that was part of the U of SA shipment. It bears no post-factory markings.

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-05-2011, 11:22 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is online now
SWCA Member
Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,996
Likes: 5,008
Liked 7,702 Times in 2,624 Posts
Default

Waidmann may have asked the question, but this forum member learned a lot too. I appreciate knowing all these early serial numbers for the different varieties that can be identified. My thanks to the Victory guys and their learned commentators!
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-2011, 10:24 PM
Waidmann Waidmann is offline
Member
Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database Question for Victory Database  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Post script: dbarn in his "S&W Pre-Victory" has a lettered Canadian# 942 974 not U.S. Property but bearing W.B.and bomb. The shipping date is March 19, 1942. The piece has a PO rack number and London proofs.

Last edited by Waidmann; 12-07-2011 at 12:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
commercial, military, prewar, transition, united states property, victory


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question/Victory Database? Waidmann S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 08-10-2012 10:27 PM
Question for the Victory Database Waidmann S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 8 03-18-2012 05:51 PM
a question for the Victory Database Waidmann S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 3 02-01-2012 08:33 PM
Victory database, Question copter_dad S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 13 10-22-2010 10:09 AM
.38/200 Victory for database + cleaning question (pics added) carguychris S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 10 08-03-2008 12:39 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)