|
|
02-13-2012, 09:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Looking for Info on K-22/Model 17
Hello,
I have temporary custody of my dad's Smith & Wesson .22 revolver, which he says is a K-22. I'd like some help with a year of manufacture. Serial number is K706912, stamped on the butt as well as inside the frame behind the extractor rod. Below the interior number it says MOD. 17-2. So is this a Model 17, or a K-22? I know the designation "Model 17" eventually replaced "K-22," but my dad seems to think this is one of the older ones.
Pictures follow, and thanks in advance for any clarification!
|
02-13-2012, 10:15 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ashland, Oregon
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 34
Liked 430 Times in 220 Posts
|
|
Nice gun.
I looked it up in the “book”, which indicates 17’2 were made from 1961-1966.
The book indicates probably a 1966 manufacturing date.
The K22 3rd Models, or pre-17 (5) screws are generally considered the older guns.
I however have a 17-1 (1960) manufactured gun that is actually more scarce than Pre-17’s and might be passed over by some collectors.
Hope This Helps,
Emory
|
02-13-2012, 10:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 1,315
Liked 1,832 Times in 701 Posts
|
|
Nice gun. Should be a great shooter.
Model numbers were assigned in 1957. Before that the model you have would have been called the K22 Masterpiece.
But it's perfectly acceptable to call any model 17 of whatever vintage a K22. The "K" indicates the frame size.
|
02-13-2012, 11:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the information, gentlemen. I hope to take it to the range soon. It probably hasn't been fired in 40 years or more.
|
02-13-2012, 11:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 4,049
Liked 2,544 Times in 738 Posts
|
|
Yur in fer some fun.
Shooting rocks, pebbles, acorns, beany weeny cans, bottles, bottle caps has a mysteriously gratifying effect on my mind. I have been a plinker all my life but the k22 just takes it to a whole new level.
I like shooting on a dirt background so I can see where my misses are hitting. I find that sort of instant feedback has improved my shooting in general more than anything else. And a 22 handgun allows lots of shooting and the k22 is accurate enough so your technique is what you have to blame when you miss
I have only found one ammo that my k22 doesn't like- the federal bulk in the red box. It loves the federal auto match, the remington bulk box and winchester (555) red box, but CCI standard velocity is the favorite.
|
02-14-2012, 12:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks, Beagleye. I'm a city boy so I'll be shooting paper mostly. I've got some CCI Mini Mags ready to go, but it's good to know that the Winchester 555s work fine.
|
02-14-2012, 09:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 1,315
Liked 1,832 Times in 701 Posts
|
|
For what it's worth, you might have to play around a bit to find ammo your gun likes.
I have three K22s and luckily all of them like the Federal bulk pack from Wally world.
Let us know how it goes!
|
02-14-2012, 01:01 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,573
Liked 22,434 Times in 8,279 Posts
|
|
I would recommend trying some standard velocity also, it is often more accurate than the High Velocity in a K22.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
02-15-2012, 04:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks, Cooter and H Richard. I'll definitely try some different types, including standard velocity. That's the good thing about the .22 round--I won't break the bank searching around for what the gun likes.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|