Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2012, 07:03 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 5,123
Liked 19,067 Times in 6,884 Posts
Default Help! Date conflict, maybe

Okay. The first K frame .38 (and 32 WCF) hand ejector was the Model of 1899. So far, no controversy.
But the info I have is that the .38 Special cartridge was not introduced to the shooting public by S&W until 1902. If this is the case, the 1st Model should have been chambered for the .38 S&W not the Special. The Second Model (or Model of 1902) would be the first .38 Special.
But SCSW says otherwise. Was the First Model chambered for the .38 Special or not?
Thanks.
JP
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2012, 07:59 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,376 Times in 5,479 Posts
Default

According to both Jinks and Supica's books, the 38 Hand Ejector Military & Police First Model (Model 1899) was chambered in 38 Special. The Model 1899 introduced the cartridge and they were manufactured from 1899 to 1902, with 20,000 manufactured. There were a few made in 38 Long Colt as well.

Last edited by glowe; 02-16-2012 at 08:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2012, 08:46 PM
mikepriwer mikepriwer is offline
SWCA Member
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
Default

The non-Army contract 1899's either have no caliber marking, or
clearly say .38 S&W Special. I think, but am not sure, that the Army
contract guns have a two-line caliber marking, that specifies both
38 S&W Special and US Service Cartridge. This two-line marking may
also be on some non-Army 1899's.

Clearly, 38 Special was available.

Mike Priwer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2012, 09:28 PM
opoefc opoefc is offline
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
Absent Comrade
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

Yes, as Mike says, the two line caliber marking is seen on some commercial models, as well as the military contract guns. Just an example of S&W using up surplus parts. You can also encounter the two line caliber stampings on the 6 inch barrels of later Model 1902 S&Ws. Ed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:03 PM
Waidmann Waidmann is offline
Member
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Were some not marked .38 MIL. ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:42 PM
cgt4570's Avatar
cgt4570 cgt4570 is offline
SWCA Member
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mount Carmel, TN USA
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 1,628
Liked 3,178 Times in 933 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikepriwer View Post
The non-Army contract 1899's either have no caliber marking, or
clearly say .38 S&W Special. I think, but am not sure, that the Army
contract guns have a two-line caliber marking, that specifies both
38 S&W Special and US Service Cartridge. This two-line marking may
also be on some non-Army 1899's.

Clearly, 38 Special was available.

Mike Priwer
The Army purchase models do not say .38 Special. The two line info was only on the later commercial guns.
__________________
Chris
SWCA #2243 SWHF #292
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-17-2012, 01:47 AM
Oyeboteb Oyeboteb is offline
Member
Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
Default

Some say 'US Service Cartridge' meaning .38 Long Colt, but they also chambered and were implicitly meant for, the new .38 Special Cartridge.

.38 Special - if memory serve - was developed in 1897-1898, and was perfected for the intended Chambering of the Model 1899 M&P Revolver series.

Originally it was a Black Powder Cartridge, and, very soon was offered in Smokeless.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-17-2012, 09:03 AM
pace40's Avatar
pace40 pace40 is offline
Member
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA.
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 9
Liked 1,285 Times in 264 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waidmann View Post
Were some not marked .38 MIL. ?
Yep

__________________
Pace
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-17-2012, 12:42 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,573
Liked 22,434 Times in 8,279 Posts
Default

Evidently early guns were properly marked 38 Special. Here's my 1899 commercial with the caliber clearly marked on the left side of the barrel.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-17-2012, 01:04 PM
mikepriwer mikepriwer is offline
SWCA Member
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
Default

Well - guess I was wrong about the Military contract models. One line
it is.

Mike Priwe
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-17-2012, 01:46 PM
TripleLock's Avatar
TripleLock TripleLock is offline
Member
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plantersville, MS
Posts: 224
Likes: 811
Liked 403 Times in 128 Posts
Default

The .38 Smith & Wesson Special cartridge is not listed in Winchester's Catalog No.64, dated August 1899, but is listed in their Catalog No.65, dated April 1900. This would seem to place the likely commercial introduction of the .38 Special cartridge in the last four months of 1899, maybe the early months of 1900.

FWIW, the listed available loadings from Winchester in 1900 were either 21 grains of black powder or an unspecified weight of smokeless, with a 158 grain lead round-nose bullet.

TL
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-17-2012, 04:27 PM
pff pff is offline
Member
Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I have held in my hand (but didn't have the cash for dammit) an 1899 with S/N of 183. Commercial model shipped to Bekeart. I figure first weeks production?

Anyway, the letter stated it was shipped in .38 Special and it was so marked.

That 1902 origin date for the .38 Special has been repeated so many times it has a life of its own. But its wrong.


Regards,

Pat

Last edited by pff; 02-17-2012 at 04:28 PM. Reason: tpyo
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-17-2012, 05:49 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe Help! Date conflict, maybe  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,376 Times in 5,479 Posts
Default

The earliest ship date in the SWCA database is September 1899 for serial number 865. sn 225 was shipped in December 1899.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bekeart, cartridge, colt, commercial, ejector, hand ejector, jinks, k frame, military, scsw, smith-wessonforum.com, supica, swca, winchester


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Conflict between the Standard Catalog of S&W and my Model 11s PJGP S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 4 09-29-2016 04:22 PM
how to deal with the aftermath of an armed conflict? mikejax23 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 11 12-25-2013 01:13 AM
load data conflict straight stick Reloading 14 09-23-2013 02:34 AM
Korean Conflict or something? Tam 3 The Lounge 40 08-08-2013 10:52 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)