|
|
02-16-2012, 07:03 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,507
Likes: 5,124
Liked 19,083 Times in 6,885 Posts
|
|
Help! Date conflict, maybe
Okay. The first K frame .38 (and 32 WCF) hand ejector was the Model of 1899. So far, no controversy.
But the info I have is that the .38 Special cartridge was not introduced to the shooting public by S&W until 1902. If this is the case, the 1st Model should have been chambered for the .38 S&W not the Special. The Second Model (or Model of 1902) would be the first .38 Special.
But SCSW says otherwise. Was the First Model chambered for the .38 Special or not?
Thanks.
JP
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
02-16-2012, 07:59 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,380 Times in 5,479 Posts
|
|
According to both Jinks and Supica's books, the 38 Hand Ejector Military & Police First Model (Model 1899) was chambered in 38 Special. The Model 1899 introduced the cartridge and they were manufactured from 1899 to 1902, with 20,000 manufactured. There were a few made in 38 Long Colt as well.
Last edited by glowe; 02-16-2012 at 08:01 PM.
|
02-16-2012, 08:46 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
|
|
The non-Army contract 1899's either have no caliber marking, or
clearly say .38 S&W Special. I think, but am not sure, that the Army
contract guns have a two-line caliber marking, that specifies both
38 S&W Special and US Service Cartridge. This two-line marking may
also be on some non-Army 1899's.
Clearly, 38 Special was available.
Mike Priwer
|
02-16-2012, 09:28 PM
|
US Veteran SWCA Founding Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
|
|
Yes, as Mike says, the two line caliber marking is seen on some commercial models, as well as the military contract guns. Just an example of S&W using up surplus parts. You can also encounter the two line caliber stampings on the 6 inch barrels of later Model 1902 S&Ws. Ed.
|
02-16-2012, 11:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Were some not marked .38 MIL. ?
|
02-16-2012, 11:42 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mount Carmel, TN USA
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 1,628
Liked 3,178 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikepriwer
The non-Army contract 1899's either have no caliber marking, or
clearly say .38 S&W Special. I think, but am not sure, that the Army
contract guns have a two-line caliber marking, that specifies both
38 S&W Special and US Service Cartridge. This two-line marking may
also be on some non-Army 1899's.
Clearly, 38 Special was available.
Mike Priwer
|
The Army purchase models do not say .38 Special. The two line info was only on the later commercial guns.
__________________
Chris
SWCA #2243 SWHF #292
|
02-17-2012, 01:47 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
|
|
Some say 'US Service Cartridge' meaning .38 Long Colt, but they also chambered and were implicitly meant for, the new .38 Special Cartridge.
.38 Special - if memory serve - was developed in 1897-1898, and was perfected for the intended Chambering of the Model 1899 M&P Revolver series.
Originally it was a Black Powder Cartridge, and, very soon was offered in Smokeless.
|
02-17-2012, 09:03 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA.
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 9
Liked 1,285 Times in 264 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waidmann
Were some not marked .38 MIL. ?
|
Yep
__________________
Pace
|
02-17-2012, 12:42 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,573
Liked 22,434 Times in 8,279 Posts
|
|
Evidently early guns were properly marked 38 Special. Here's my 1899 commercial with the caliber clearly marked on the left side of the barrel.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
02-17-2012, 01:04 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
|
|
Well - guess I was wrong about the Military contract models. One line
it is.
Mike Priwe
|
02-17-2012, 01:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plantersville, MS
Posts: 224
Likes: 813
Liked 403 Times in 128 Posts
|
|
The .38 Smith & Wesson Special cartridge is not listed in Winchester's Catalog No.64, dated August 1899, but is listed in their Catalog No.65, dated April 1900. This would seem to place the likely commercial introduction of the .38 Special cartridge in the last four months of 1899, maybe the early months of 1900.
FWIW, the listed available loadings from Winchester in 1900 were either 21 grains of black powder or an unspecified weight of smokeless, with a 158 grain lead round-nose bullet.
TL
|
02-17-2012, 04:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
I have held in my hand (but didn't have the cash for dammit) an 1899 with S/N of 183. Commercial model shipped to Bekeart. I figure first weeks production?
Anyway, the letter stated it was shipped in .38 Special and it was so marked.
That 1902 origin date for the .38 Special has been repeated so many times it has a life of its own. But its wrong.
Regards,
Pat
Last edited by pff; 02-17-2012 at 04:28 PM.
Reason: tpyo
|
02-17-2012, 05:49 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,380 Times in 5,479 Posts
|
|
The earliest ship date in the SWCA database is September 1899 for serial number 865. sn 225 was shipped in December 1899.
|
|
Tags
|
bekeart, cartridge, colt, commercial, ejector, hand ejector, jinks, k frame, military, scsw, smith-wessonforum.com, supica, swca, winchester |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|