|
|
03-17-2012, 08:22 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Question for the Victory Database
Is V1908XX a valid serial number for a US NAVY marked gun?
Or, is it too late production?
Thanks,
Waidmann
|
03-17-2012, 09:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pennsylvania,USA
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 400
Liked 522 Times in 329 Posts
|
|
Not Too Late!!
Waidman,
I show a more than a few that shipped to the Navy as well as the Coast Guard in the 189,000-191,000 Serial No. Range & quite a few much later than that!! Only a Research Letter will tell the tale for sure!! Hope this helps!!
__________________
Masterpiece
|
03-17-2012, 10:07 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Yes, it does. The gun in question appears to be correctly (top strap) marked. My flawed memory was that only lower numbers were legitimate candidates for such markings. Later models were all bought by the Army then distributed to whomever with the two styles of US Property markings with the exceptions being Defense Supplies Corporation and some later OSS guns.
I can't imagine it is to the point of faking Victories, but given prices lately, maybe it is?
Anyway, Thank you,
Waidmann
|
03-17-2012, 03:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 511
Liked 1,972 Times in 508 Posts
|
|
I have one all the way up in the 261000 range that has the "U.S. NAVY" topstrap marking, but... it also has an "SV" prefix, which means it went back to the factory just after the war for the new hammer block retrofit, so whether that marking was originally applied or done upon the later occasion could be a legitimate question. That said, it doesn't especially look as if the later style military markings were scrubbed off to permit the naval type to be then put on, but I can't absolutely exclude that possibility, either. I've posted a photo of the marking so that folks can judge for themselves.
__________________
SWCA #590
"Colligo ergo sum"
|
03-17-2012, 04:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Same; same, in my perception.
|
03-18-2012, 04:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
To confirm, based on information in the database maintained by Charlie ("ordnanceguy") and me, it wasn't until the mid-V260000 range that the top strap markings were changed.
Steve
__________________
CHL/NRA Instructor/RSO/Referee
|
03-18-2012, 04:27 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 511
Liked 1,972 Times in 508 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LWCmdr45
...it wasn't until the mid-V260000 range that the top strap markings were changed.
|
Thanks, Steve, but just to clarify, does "mid-V260000" mean between V260000 and 261000, or somewhere around V265000? And as to the time frame, what would that be, around the first half of 1943?
I'd also presume that, as is typical with S&W production, there isn't a clear demarcation in the serial number sequence between the two types of markings, but that rather there's a sprinkling of each around the "point" at which the change was made?
__________________
SWCA #590
"Colligo ergo sum"
Last edited by Goony; 03-18-2012 at 04:32 PM.
|
03-18-2012, 04:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goony
Thanks, Steve, but just to clarify, does "mid-V260000" mean between V260000 and 261000, or somewhere around V265000? And as to the time frame, what would that be, around the first half of 1943?
|
To date, the database shows the highest SN with the "U.S. NAVY" top strap marking to be V267571.
The highest SN with the old "UNITED STATES PROPERTY" Lend-Lease top strap markings is V286588.
The lowest SN with the newer "U.S. PROPERTY" (along with the "flaming bomb" and G.H.D. initials) marking is V203202. (That frame must have been *way* at the back of the shelf!)
All of these changes occured about the Spring of 1943.
[/QUOTE]I'd also presume that, as is typical with S&W production, there isn't a clear demarcation in the serial number sequence between the two types of markings, but that rather there's a sprinkling of each around the "point" at which the change was made?[/QUOTE]
100% kee-rect!
Steve
__________________
CHL/NRA Instructor/RSO/Referee
|
03-18-2012, 05:51 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 511
Liked 1,972 Times in 508 Posts
|
|
Well, that puts to rest the thought that my "SV" prefixed gun might have originally borne the later style military top strap markings.
__________________
SWCA #590
"Colligo ergo sum"
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|