Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-03-2012, 08:06 PM
Litak45 Litak45 is offline
Member
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?

First off, let me just state that I know no one can authoratively state anything for sure regarding my particular gun, without proper examination by a gunsmith, etc, etc. I am just looking for some general ideas though to point my in the right direction before doing that.

I have an early 40's K frame (pre-10, pre-victory), that was rebarreled into a snubbie in the late 40's/early 50's for a police department. Its a .38 Special cylinder, barrel and all, was never a British lend gun that was reamed out later on, etc. Shoots brilliantly, proverbial glass rod breaking trigger, good condition.

I am just curious if it would be okay to try shooting some of the modern +P rounds through it? I am planning on using it as a carry gun and would just like to be able to load something a bit hotter than regular .38 for defensive purposes. Someone I already asked suggested calling Smith and Wesson directly, but I figured I'd start here on the internet first...

Last edited by Litak45; 05-03-2012 at 08:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2012, 08:12 PM
geoff40's Avatar
geoff40 geoff40 is offline
Member
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 212
Liked 838 Times in 262 Posts
Default

If it was originally a 38 S&W cylinder, then I'd say no it is not safe for +P.
__________________
Geoff. Since 1960.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2012, 09:57 PM
Alk8944 Alk8944 is offline
Suspended
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,916 Times in 3,555 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geoff40 View Post
If it was originally a 38 S&W cylinder, then I'd say no it is not safe for +P.
If you had read his post you would have seen his gun is not a Victory or Lend-Lease revolver originally chambered for .38-200, but was originally .38 Special.

Litak45,

Per "Smith & Wesson Handguns" by McHenry and Roper it is mentioned that when the 2" M&P was introduced in 1938 S&W advertised that among acceptable cartridges for this variation was the .38-44 S&W Special, a cartridge which developed pressures in the 25,000 PSI+ range. There is no reason to suppose that any revolvers buillt from that time on would not be capable of shooting this cartridge. As a matter of fact, the specific comment was made that any M&P manufactured after the introduction of heat treating of cylinders in 1919 should be capable of using the .38-44.

The .38 Special +P is loaded to roughly 75% the pressure of the .38-44. Draw your own conclusions.

Since the barrel steels are softer and more susceptible to mechanical wear I would recommend staying away from jacketed bullets. Revolver barrels, or any for that matter, will last virtually forever is shot exclusively with lead bullets.

This post is a little more in-depth in it's citations: .38 Special +P in K-Frame revolvers

Last edited by Alk8944; 05-03-2012 at 10:01 PM. Reason: Add link
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2012, 10:40 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,411 Times in 3,291 Posts
Default

Factory +P is not loaded beyond allowable chamber pressure and would not be a problem in a 1940s K frame.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2012, 05:19 AM
geoff40's Avatar
geoff40 geoff40 is offline
Member
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 212
Liked 838 Times in 262 Posts
Default

Actually, I did read his post, and originally it said that the cylinder was a 38 S&W cylinder. It has been edited/corrected since.
__________________
Geoff. Since 1960.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2012, 12:33 PM
Vulcan Bob's Avatar
Vulcan Bob Vulcan Bob is offline
Member
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: central pa
Posts: 5,336
Likes: 2,745
Liked 2,492 Times in 1,182 Posts
Default

Well if in sound mechanical shape plus P's will not blow it up, but I feel a steady diet of them may or may not accelerate wear. With that said, I personally do not use Plus P's in my older K-frames just because they dont make em anymore and why take the chance? I save them for my more modren gun's and sleep better.
__________________
Stay safe people!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2012, 01:56 PM
Iggy's Avatar
Iggy Iggy is offline
Member
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 10,428
Liked 28,236 Times in 5,273 Posts
Default

S&W will tell you that if the gun has a designated Model number stamped in the frame, it's OK to use +P ammo. I think previous posters are right, but draw your own conclusions.
__________________
Eccentric old coot
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2012, 03:09 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,919
Likes: 997
Liked 19,061 Times in 9,319 Posts
Default

There is +P rated at 125 gr/850 fps, and another at 158 gr/1200 fps. Neither will blow up a mechanically and metallurgically sound gun of this era, but hotter loads will accelerate wear. I would try a few +P loads (Speer Gold Dot, Hornady Critical Defense are two often recommended), see how they work for you and the sights. These will be fairly expensive and you wouldn't want to use them all the time.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-04-2012, 04:46 PM
roaddog28's Avatar
roaddog28 roaddog28 is offline
Member
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 185
Liked 214 Times in 72 Posts
Default

Your ok to shoot 38 +P in your revolver. I have a M&P 38 special 4 inch made before S&W labeled their revolvers with a model number and I use 38 +P rounds. Any S&W 38 special made back to 1940 and older can handle the +P round. Most standard 38 special LRN back in those days was running in at close to 900 fps in a 6 inch barrel. Todays +P is running at 850 fps. Standard pressure is running at 750 or less now. Like previous threads on this forum, +P is a marketing tool for the ammo makers. Your revolver was rated at 21,500 psi. Todays +P round runs no higher than 18,500 psi. I use rounds that run in the 900 and higher in my M&P. I have no problems. I can shake out the fired rounds from my revolver. I have no forcing cone damage or any evidence that the revolver has excessive wear. The M&P is a strong revolver. It will take just about any factory 38 or 38+P round made today.
So have fun shooting your classic revolver.
Regards.
Howard
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2012, 11:41 PM
Dave T Dave T is offline
Member
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog View Post
There is +P rated at...158 gr/1200 fps.
Would you supply the source/manufacturer of this 1200 fps +P 38 Special load? I've never heard of it and frankly question it's existence.

The old 38/44s, intended for use in the N-framed Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman produced only about 1150 fps from a 5" barrel but that load isn't around any more. Buffalo Bore is the only one that comes close and it's almost a perfect duplicate of the old 38/44. Still not 1200 fps.

Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-04-2012, 11:52 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,919
Likes: 997
Liked 19,061 Times in 9,319 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave T View Post
Would you supply the source/manufacturer of this 1200 fps +P 38 Special load? I've never heard of it and frankly question it's existence.

The old 38/44s, intended for use in the N-framed Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman produced only about 1150 fps from a 5" barrel but that load isn't around any more. Buffalo Bore is the only one that comes close and it's almost a perfect duplicate of the old 38/44. Still not 1200 fps.

Dave
Heavy .38 Special +P Pistol & Handgun Ammunition

Note the quote for load 20A in a 4" barrel. I took poetic license in rounding 1162 to 1200 fps. In reviewing the original post, I see his M&P has a 2" barrel - my mistake.

My point is there appears to be quite a range (no pun intended) of what is considered +P loads, and some will probably cause a gun to shake loose more quickly than others with prolonged use.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220

Last edited by murphydog; 05-05-2012 at 12:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-05-2012, 12:40 AM
STCM(SW)'s Avatar
STCM(SW) STCM(SW) is online now
US Veteran
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,500
Likes: 1,330
Liked 10,609 Times in 3,232 Posts
Default

From a 1939 catalog
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-05-2012, 09:21 AM
Alk8944 Alk8944 is offline
Suspended
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,916 Times in 3,555 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STCM(SW) View Post
From a 1939 catalog
Nice as those numbers look, you have to remember that no one except the factories has chronographs then. There was no way for the average person to check actual velocities. Most of these velocity figures, unfortunately, bear little resemblance to reality. They cannot be used to make comparisons between what is currently available and ammunition performance "back in the day".

There is one, the .357 Magnum listing, which is realistic as it can be duplicated with the same powder used by the factories at that time, 2400, in an 8 3/8" revolver, and with cast bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-05-2012, 09:28 AM
Alk8944 Alk8944 is offline
Suspended
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,916 Times in 3,555 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geoff40 View Post
Actually, I did read his post, and originally it said that the cylinder was a 38 S&W cylinder. It has been edited/corrected since.
Geoff,

Since I didn't see the OP until after the edit, and he didn't indicate what the edit was, I will concede that to you. If that is what he said you were absolutely correct. I wouldn't go so far as to say shooting +P in a modified .38-200 would be dangerous, or hazardous to the gun, but it certainly would be inadvisable.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-05-2012, 07:00 PM
roaddog28's Avatar
roaddog28 roaddog28 is offline
Member
Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P? Early 40's K frame - safe for +P?  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 185
Liked 214 Times in 72 Posts
Default

The issue of the whether to shoot +P 38 special ammo in a older S&W M&P is a myth. Most of it is the result of ammo makers downgrading there standard pressure 38 special ammo and relabeling what used to be standard pressure ammo to "+P". Before 1972 the standard pressure 38 special LRN round was running right a 850 fps. I was using this round in S&W M&Ps and early model 10s. If one is curious they can look on the internet and find several good articles by knowlegable sources confirming that the standard pressure 38 special round was running at 850 to 870 out of a 6 inch barrel. I never heard or scene a S&W K frame blowing up from using the standard pressure rounds in that time frame. Any revolver can wear out because of various reasons.
I have always maintain that a S&W 38 special steel revolver that is in good condition can shoot any round that is on the market right now.
Here is another article on the M&P 38 special hand ejector. It does reveal the first 38 special revolvers and the kind of ammo that was used.
Regards,
Howard
The First M&P - the Smith and Wesson Military and Police Hand Ejector Model of 1899
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
357 magnum, chamber pressure, ejector, gunsmith, hand ejector, hornady, k frame, military, outdoorsman, pre-10, roper, smith & wesson, smith and wesson, victory


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FOUND WTB Early Smith J frame Dark Washer J Frame Diamond Round Butt Grips jringo8769 WANTED to Buy 2 08-02-2016 12:14 AM
I Frame - Safe to Load 6? Dude S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3 07-06-2015 10:53 AM
Any .38 Ammo is Safe in a K, Frame, Right? kbm6893 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 10-01-2011 10:01 PM
Safe J-Frame ammo 7shooter Ammo 9 04-09-2011 10:07 AM
Feeling safe with my J frame Robert B Concealed Carry & Self Defense 25 03-30-2009 06:12 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)