Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2012, 01:28 PM
mikepriwer mikepriwer is offline
SWCA Member
Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,284
Likes: 974
Liked 6,635 Times in 1,359 Posts
Default Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions

Since the 1970's, the collectors nomenclature for these two early K-frames has
generally resulted in both models taking the name of Model of 1905. This has resulted
in a near-disappearance of referring to the round-butt guns as Model of 1902.

One of the reasons for this, but not the only reason, is the notion that, other than the
butt configuration, the guns are otherwise identical. The early catalogs, in fact,
make this point.

These next three pictures are from the 1913-1915 Three Pirates S&W Catalog, named
for the cover of the catalog. In this catalog, as ite has been since 1905, the two guns
are designated at different models. That is, each has a separate page and discussion.
By 1919, the next catalog I have, the 1902 & 1905 designations have been
changed, to simply Round Butt and Square Butt.







The D-3 catalog, however, discloses vital statistics about these two models. These next
pages are from the D-3 catalog.



If one looks closely, they will see that there are siginificant differences between the two models.
Check out the overall lengths of the guns, and their weights. They are different. Also, the round
butt model is no longer being offered with adjustable sights.

It seems clear, from these descriptions, that the guns really are two different models,
and that the proper name for the round-butt model is either the Model of 1902, or
the round-butt Military and Police.

Regards, Mike Priwer
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 09-10-2012, 03:39 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,391
Likes: 3,069
Liked 14,498 Times in 5,520 Posts
Default

I would assume that the square butt would measure longer and weigh more that the round butt based on the long tail of the stock frame and more metal??

Here is another conundrum. How would you classify the 32-20 caliber M&P? Same era, both round and square butt configuration, so would the round butt 32-20 Model 1905 actually be a Model 1902 throughout their production? Catalog D-3 only shows the square butt 32-20, nor is the round butt is found on the D-3 price list.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg S&W Catalog D-3.jpg (134.1 KB, 52 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2012, 04:25 PM
mikepriwer mikepriwer is offline
SWCA Member
Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,284
Likes: 974
Liked 6,635 Times in 1,359 Posts
Default

Glowe

In the earlier years, both the 1902 and 1905 were cataloged as being chambered for
either cartridge - the 38 Special or the 32 WCF . As late as the Three Pirates Catalog,
it was still being marketed that way. By the time of the D-3 catalog, the 32 WCF
has its own page, meaning that it is its own model. Since the round butt 32 WCF is
no longer being offered, they've changed the name to "Military and Police 32/20
Winchester Square Butt" .

In the earlier years, the caliber was not a part of the name of the model, since it
was considered an option, as different barrel lenghts were an option. The S&WCA
collectors do have their own naming scheme for all of this !

Regards, Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-11-2012, 02:24 PM
jesseatamez's Avatar
jesseatamez jesseatamez is offline
Member
Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Eastern, NC
Posts: 232
Likes: 10
Liked 54 Times in 19 Posts
Default .

Mike,

So when did D-3 come out then, 1916?

Regards, Jesse
__________________
"Suum Cuique"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-11-2012, 04:15 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,360
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,158 Times in 7,409 Posts
Default

Some of the difference is just rnd. butt vs. sq. butt. Someone may have mismeasured a gun if those figures don't jive otherwise. Because the round butt curves in at the bottom, it will measure shorter than one might expect.

The rest is just markerting jive. This was one basic gun, offered in either .38 Special, or in .32-20.

But I was glad to see those old catalogs. Did Howard Pyle do the ill. of the pirates, or is the art not signed? I saw books about Robin Hood and Treasure Island that he illustrated, and wonder if this catalog was his work, too.

Thanks,

T-Star
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-11-2012, 04:20 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,360
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,158 Times in 7,409 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe View Post
I would assume that the square butt would measure longer and weigh more that the round butt based on the long tail of the stock frame and more metal??

Here is another conundrum. How would you classify the 32-20 caliber M&P? Same era, both round and square butt configuration, so would the round butt 32-20 Model 1905 actually be a Model 1902 throughout their production? Catalog D-3 only shows the square butt 32-20, nor is the round butt is found on the D-3 price list.
Look at the description of the sights in your photo. They refer to a "Partridge" front sight, not the correct spelling as "Patridge", after the man who designed it. The factory was clearly capable of errors in print.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-11-2012, 05:28 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,391
Likes: 3,069
Liked 14,498 Times in 5,520 Posts
Default

So when did D-3 come out then, 1916?

Jessie - My D-3 catalog has a price list dated March 1, 1923.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Retail Prices Page 2 1923.jpg (76.8 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg Retail Prices Page 1 1923.jpg (74.3 KB, 23 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-11-2012, 05:30 PM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,391
Likes: 3,069
Liked 14,498 Times in 5,520 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star View Post
Look at the description of the sights in your photo. They refer to a "Partridge" front sight, not the correct spelling as "Patridge", after the man who designed it. The factory was clearly capable of errors in print.
Texas Star - Maybe that is why some people call ruffed grouse a patridge??
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:03 PM
Wiregrassguy's Avatar
Wiregrassguy Wiregrassguy is offline
SWCA Member
Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,000
Likes: 35,154
Liked 10,822 Times in 3,691 Posts
Default

No, it is a Massachusetts enunciation of partridge.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:11 PM
jhvaughan2's Avatar
jhvaughan2 jhvaughan2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 358
Likes: 2
Liked 111 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star View Post
Look at the description of the sights in your photo. They refer to a "Partridge" front sight, not the correct spelling as "Patridge", after the man who designed it. The factory was clearly capable of errors in print.
Probably to much reliance on the spell check function.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-11-2012, 07:19 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,360
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,158 Times in 7,409 Posts
Default

I know that ruffed (and other US) grouse are called partridges, but am not sure they are true partidges, like the Spanish perdiz (Red-legged Partridge), the chukar partridge, or the Hungarian partridge stocked in some US locales, as with the Asiatic chukar.

Do any of you know for sure?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-11-2012, 10:36 PM
Oyeboteb Oyeboteb is offline
Member
Revisiting the 1902 vs 1905 Discussions  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
Default

I thought the primary difference between the m1902 and the m1905, was that of the Screw occuring in the front of the Trigger Bow.

A year or so ago, I almost bought a long Barrel, Round Butt, Factory Target 'M&P' with Black Hard Rubber Stocks, which was made in 1938...I wish I had, I would have, but I thought about it a minute and someone else grabbed it.

But, clearly, the Round Butt ( with Black Hard Rubber Stocks ) was available in Target versions at leat up to WWII, whether offered any longer in the Catalogues as such, or not.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1902 or 1905 East Texas S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 29 01-01-2021 02:34 AM
S&W Model 1902 or 1905 (?), .32 Winchester photog-shooter S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 11-11-2015 10:57 PM
Model of 1902 or 1905? (again, for those of us who are slow) JimSupica S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 16 08-15-2015 07:47 PM
1902/1905 ASSEMBLY AND PARTS JELLYDOT S&W-Smithing 2 03-01-2014 12:19 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)