Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2013, 06:30 PM
samoyed samoyed is offline
Member
My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
Liked 22 Times in 6 Posts
Default My new M1917

I'd like to share with you a M1917 serial #394 I bought a couple months back. It was in my LGS with pearl grips and no lanyard ring. I couldn't believe there was a low serial number 1917 sitting there for what he wanted and it had not been quickly snagged up. I bought new reproduction grips and lanyard ring. I also received a letter from SRS. Enjoy.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20131207_142011 (1024x576).jpg (108.8 KB, 179 views)
File Type: jpg 20131207_142148 (1024x576).jpg (196.3 KB, 131 views)
File Type: jpg 20131207_142132 (1024x576).jpg (147.7 KB, 119 views)
File Type: jpg 20131207_151957 (1024x576).jpg (257.5 KB, 130 views)
__________________
Ryan
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 12-07-2013, 07:00 PM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is offline
US Veteran
My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,431
Likes: 90,856
Liked 25,074 Times in 8,580 Posts
Default

Nice gun.

Is the hammer grooved? The early guns had grooved hammers and the grips had concave tops.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2013, 07:18 PM
Oyeboteb Oyeboteb is offline
Member
My new M1917  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
Default

What a remarkably EARLY one to find! Wow!

I would expect a 'grooved' Hammer also on one this early.


Lovely old m1917!!


It shows to go you - one never knows what Treasures one's LGS might have, when one least expects it!


Say, if you do not wish to keep the Pearl Stocks, may I buy them from you? I have an old period-Custom N-Frame from the same time period, which they would work well on.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 12-07-2013, 07:29 PM
samoyed samoyed is offline
Member
My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
Liked 22 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Hammer is grooved where your thumb would go. PM me for the Pearl Grips. The new grips were the closest I could find for the price.
__________________
Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2013, 08:10 PM
Oyeboteb Oyeboteb is offline
Member
My new M1917  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samoyed View Post
Hammer is grooved where your thumb would go.

Early Hammers had concentric tiny 'grooves' on their sides.

I will see if I can find a picture and post a link here in a minute.

Same Hammer was used on the Registered Magnums later on.

Possibly, your Revolver got a replacement Hammer somewhere along the way, or, maybe, the earliest OF the "Early" used a smooth side Hammer?

I do not know.

The super 'early' of any Model sometimes tend to have their oddities!


Quote:
PM me for the Pearl Grips. The new grips were the closest I could find for the price.
Much obliged!

Will do!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2013, 08:11 PM
Oyeboteb Oyeboteb is offline
Member
My new M1917  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
Default

Link to an image showing a 'groove' sided Hammer on an early S & W m1917 Revolver -

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/k...6/IMG_1609.jpg

Last edited by Oyeboteb; 12-07-2013 at 08:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2013, 08:58 PM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is offline
US Veteran
My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,431
Likes: 90,856
Liked 25,074 Times in 8,580 Posts
Default

"Same Hammer was used on the Registered Magnums later on."

The RMs had hammers with grooved sides, but the top, from the end of the spur forward, had a different checkering pattern.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-07-2013, 09:24 PM
Oyeboteb Oyeboteb is offline
Member
My new M1917  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muley Gil View Post
"Same Hammer was used on the Registered Magnums later on."

The RMs had hammers with grooved sides, but the top, from the end of the spur forward, had a different checkering pattern.
Oh my...

So, were all of the Registered Magnums the then new 'Humpback' Hammer?

Somehow, I thought they came either way - either Hammer shape of the time.

I may indeed have been in error with that.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-07-2013, 09:38 PM
Memphis Memphis is offline
Member
My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eads, Tn, Unites State
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 2,912
Liked 885 Times in 283 Posts
Default

Nope, all the RM's were not the Humpback. Some had the humpback but the ones that didn't still had a hammer that had different checkering on the top from that of a 1917 grooved hammer.
I just bought a 4 digit serial number 1917 that has the grooved hammer. Very strangely though it did not have the "GHS" inspector mark on the frame.
Thanks for sharing yet another VERY low serial numbered 1917!

Roger

Last edited by Memphis; 12-07-2013 at 09:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 12-07-2013, 10:14 PM
samoyed samoyed is offline
Member
My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917 My new M1917  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
Liked 22 Times in 6 Posts
Default

The sides of the hammer are smooth. May have been a replacement. The LGS had no idea or wasn't willing to tell me where it came from. The barrel, cylinder and butt serial numbers match but the extractor doesn't. Should it?

I noticed of few of you in this thread are SWCA members. I let my membership lapse a couple years back and would like to get back into the Assoc. Any help?
__________________
Ryan

Last edited by samoyed; 12-07-2013 at 10:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-07-2013, 11:36 PM
Oyeboteb Oyeboteb is offline
Member
My new M1917  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
Nope, all the RM's were not the Humpback. Some had the humpback but the ones that didn't still had a hammer that had different checkering on the top from that of a 1917 grooved hammer.

Roger
Thanks Roger!


I will definitely be trying to look into these Hammer types used on the RMs.


Interesting stuff!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
...M1917... ParadiseRoad S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 3 09-23-2015 09:38 PM
M1917, what should I do ? davefromhere S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 51 08-02-2015 09:44 PM
S&W M1917 Nframe29 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 10 02-22-2015 07:15 PM
Value of S&W M1917 BigBoy99 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 1 11-07-2013 03:51 PM
M1917 Duster42 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 4 11-03-2007 11:05 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)