|
|
12-21-2013, 07:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: North Texas
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Lead or FMJ bullet
I own an M&P .38 4" barrel #S976xxx. I was told that if the lands and grooves are the same size that it was made to only shoot lead bullets. If the lands are smaller than the grooves it was made to shoot FMJ. New one on me. I'm also new to old M&P Smiths and this forum.
Jim
|
12-21-2013, 08:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,492
Likes: 14,634
Liked 9,338 Times in 3,733 Posts
|
|
I believe that someone was blowing smoke up your kilt. Someone who can give a better answer will be along shortly.
I had typed out a slightly longer answer and then decided that the question had to be different than what I understood it to be and that I should shut up.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
12-21-2013, 08:54 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,412 Times in 3,291 Posts
|
|
When your gun was made I bet 99% of all revolver ammo used lead bullets. As far as I know S&W never rifled revolver barrels with the intent of tailoring them to one bullet material or the other. Except maybe the revolvers in 45 ACP. I have heard that they don't shoot lead bullets real well because they were designed for FMJ military ammo. I'll have to test mine and see. But I suspect your gun will shoot either lead or jacketed bullets with very little if any difference in accuracy.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
12-21-2013, 08:56 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,963
Likes: 1,023
Liked 19,122 Times in 9,349 Posts
|
|
Welcome! If you meant to type the "width" of the lands and grooves being different for lead vs. jacketed bullets that is a new one for me too. Someone here probably has the answer.
By the way, your .38 M & P likely shipped in 1947, and we like photos .
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
12-21-2013, 09:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: North Texas
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Yes, it sounded weird to me. The whole subject came about due to the fact that I was going to load some Rainier bullets to work a load for the pistol. Copper fouling was the issue at hand. I am really not too worried about it.
Murphydog-I was talking about width. In this pistol they are equal looking to the naked eye.
And yall get your picture!
|
12-21-2013, 09:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,716
Likes: 245
Liked 29,276 Times in 14,148 Posts
|
|
Probably early 1948 with that SN. Remember, essentially the same revolver used military jacketed bullets throughout WWII. In general, there is seldom any reason to use jacketed bullets in these if lead bullets are available.
|
12-21-2013, 09:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tincup, CO
Posts: 3,699
Likes: 6,295
Liked 7,484 Times in 2,292 Posts
|
|
I agree that lead is probably the first choice, but it doesn't have anything to do with the rifling. That said, I have had great results with plated bullets, also, in 38s. Switched to lead because they are cheaper, more available, and ... just better. I have also had the best results with 158 grain bullets, especially in fixed sight revolvers, as they are most likely to shoot to point of aim. The 125 grain bullets will often shoot low.
+1 on the .358 diameter
|
12-21-2013, 09:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: North Texas
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
I just got the pistol a few weeks ago and havent even been able to shoot it yet. This is my first revolver. Automatics have always been my thing. Shot an old S&W M&P at the range last month and fell in love with it!. Then I got this one. I loaded up 40 rounds with assorted brass, 4.2 grains HP38, 158gr lead SWC. If the weather gets better and then I get a break during my Christmas vacation you can be sure that I will be at the range trying it out.
The bore is in really good shape. The exterior of the pistol shows wear from being holstered.
Cant wait to send projectiles down range!
Jim
|
12-22-2013, 08:55 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,828
Likes: 18,633
Liked 22,470 Times in 8,294 Posts
|
|
That load should work very well in your M&P. Medium crimp should be used.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
12-22-2013, 09:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 496
Likes: 1,282
Liked 293 Times in 127 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AE5FY
I just got the pistol a few weeks ago and havent even been able to shoot it yet. This is my first revolver. Automatics have always been my thing. Shot an old S&W M&P at the range last month and fell in love with it!.
Jim
|
First, welcome. Second, get your pocketbook, credit card etc ready, I can bet this will not be your last.
|
12-22-2013, 10:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,928
Likes: 179
Liked 4,309 Times in 2,113 Posts
|
|
It sounds like an old wives tale to me. I shoot FMJ ammo with my 67-1 all the time and when I'm really "On" I can stack one round on top of another at 30 feet rather predictably. When 5 shots produce a hole at 30 feet that can completely be covered by a dime you know you are getting good accuracy worthy of a bit of bragging, even if you were cheating by shooting off a sandbag.
However, I did have some absolutely MISERABLE leading the one time I shot a box of Blazer LRN with my model 620, which features an ECM machined barrel. Just 50 rounds of that **** was enough to require over 12 hours of scrubbing with a 50/50 mix of peroxide and vinegar that I never care to repeat. Partly due to this experience and partly due to concerns about lead exposure I now only shoot either jacketed or plated bullets.
|
12-22-2013, 11:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,716
Likes: 245
Liked 29,276 Times in 14,148 Posts
|
|
There are much easier methods to remove bore leading.
|
12-22-2013, 11:34 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,085
Likes: 16,421
Liked 20,029 Times in 4,545 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AE5FY
Yes, it sounded weird to me. The whole subject came about due to the fact that I was going to load some Rainier bullets to work a load for the pistol. Copper fouling was the issue at hand. I am really not too worried about it.
Murphydog-I was talking about width. In this pistol they are equal looking to the naked eye.
And yall get your picture!
|
BTW, I like your old pre-10 .38 M&P. It has real character. It is from my favorite period of S&W manufacturing.
|
12-22-2013, 12:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 37
Liked 5,437 Times in 1,763 Posts
|
|
Free advice from "experts" -- including many on this and other forums -- is worth exactly what you pay for it. What you were told was bunk, whether given seriously or as a joke.
__________________
Pisgah
|
12-22-2013, 12:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,492
Likes: 14,634
Liked 9,338 Times in 3,733 Posts
|
|
SP mentioned what I had been thinking of - the specific issue reported about different type of ammo and rifling for the ball ammo in .45ACP.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
12-22-2013, 12:50 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,323
Likes: 34,052
Liked 10,995 Times in 3,962 Posts
|
|
Even when a firearm is specifically designed to shoot a certain bullet type, there may be others that it just happens to shoot better. Gun making is not an exact science. They only way to determine what it will shoot best is to try a wide variety of bullets and keep careful notes. My guess is that it will shoot all types about equally well.
This is about rifle barrels but may be germane to this topic:
If I recall correctly, the old British Lee-Enfield had 5 groove barrels. Somewhere along the line, at least some of the manufacturers went over to four or even six groove barrels. Then during WWII, due to the urgent need for rifles, they went to a two groove barrel, among other manufacturing shortcuts, to speed up production. To the astonishment of many "experts", it was discovered that there was no discernible difference in accuracy, regardless of the number of grooves.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
12-22-2013, 01:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 3,071
Liked 4,295 Times in 1,611 Posts
|
|
but it won't shoot +P+!! You should just send that inferior treasure to me. :<)
__________________
Dave
|
12-22-2013, 04:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: North Texas
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
+P or not, I think I will keep this one Dave!
And thanks to everyone for debunking the myth about the 'lands and grooves'. Sounded weird from the get go.
Jim
|
12-23-2013, 08:19 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 7,014
Liked 2,492 Times in 1,150 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AE5FY
... I was told that if the lands and grooves are the same size that it was made to only shoot lead bullets....
Jim
|
No, then it would be a smoothbore...
I only comment because it made me laugh!
|
12-23-2013, 08:44 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,484
Likes: 228
Liked 2,400 Times in 1,083 Posts
|
|
In general, the answer would be "Hogwash". There is a bit of truth to the statement regarding .45 ACP chambered revolvers such as the M25. The barrels frequently have a little shallower grooves than some other calibers since they were designed to shoot ball ammo. If using lead, stay away from swages bullets. Not hard enough to grip the shallow rifling very well. Hard cast bullets do fine. Don't have to be extremely hard either. Your .38 should thrive on lead bullets. I wouldn't worry about plating either. Just plain lead, properly sized and lubed, and not excessively hard will do fine.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|