Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:36 AM
muzhunter muzhunter is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 9 Posts
Default Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2

Looking at a couple 357's. One is a model 28, 6 inch no dash in very nice shape. It has diamond targets (football) stocks and no box.

Next is a 27-2, 5 inch also in very nice shape it has the display case with tools and target stocks.

They are priced $100 apart with the 27 being more.

Which one will increase in value in the coming years?

Lets hear your thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:44 AM
blackdeuce blackdeuce is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 2,032
Liked 1,264 Times in 409 Posts
Default

Assuming the 27 has the original grips, I'd say it's the better investment, but who knows? That's the one that I would buy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:50 AM
weatherby's Avatar
weatherby weatherby is online now
SWCA Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 12,732
Liked 13,495 Times in 3,405 Posts
Default

Which one will increase in value in the coming years?

Both will.

As to which one I'd be buying it would be the 5" 27 especially if it an S serial numbered one. That is just going from what you posted.
If the diamond targets happened to be cokes or the 27 was worse condition I might sway the other way.
__________________
Paul
S&WCA #2726
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-18-2014, 11:51 AM
epj's Avatar
epj epj is offline
US Veteran
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,484
Likes: 228
Liked 2,401 Times in 1,083 Posts
Default

Especially with the 27 being a 5", the $100 difference would seem pretty small. The display case is worth more than that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:02 PM
waffles waffles is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 1,096
Liked 4,116 Times in 1,172 Posts
Default

The 27 for sure.

My feeling after obtaining my 28-2 is a resounding "why?". I understand that back in the day metallurgy required something like the N frame to hold up to a steady diet of the 357 that cracked the K frames. It's gigantic, the trigger was fairly mediocre, and it sits in the closet while my L frame SSR comes out every time. N frames in 44, 45, or even the "357 8 Times" PC 627 make plenty of sense to me today.

Now I know where this goes. Why bother collecting any of the old wheelguns then? I mean what the hell does a 38/44 do that a smaller 686 doesn't at a reduced price? Well the old Smiths I've owned and played with generally show amazing bluing, superb fitting, well tuned triggers, needless intricate machine work (see the 27's top strap checkering). The 28 is the value model of the 27, a purely functional piece from the era where the N frame was a necessity for the round. The bluing and machine work on the 27 makes you think "wow, now this is a beautiful piece of craftsmanship from a bygone era" more than "huh, this is way too big and heavy for what it does" without the charm of the days of cheap high quality machining.

Basically just buy the 27, at that price difference it's a no brainer.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:02 PM
muzhunter muzhunter is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Stocks on the 27 are football target, the gun i think is a mid 70's. it has an n serial number.

The diamond targets on the 28 are not cokes.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:06 PM
arjay's Avatar
arjay arjay is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 15,204
Likes: 92,226
Liked 26,553 Times in 8,467 Posts
Default

I'd go for the older gun,but the price would have to be much lower.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:13 PM
weatherby's Avatar
weatherby weatherby is online now
SWCA Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 12,732
Liked 13,495 Times in 3,405 Posts
Default

The 27 sounds like a much better buy.
If the prices were good to start I'd be trying for a package deal.
__________________
Paul
S&WCA #2726
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:23 PM
flundertaker's Avatar
flundertaker flundertaker is offline
SWCA Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 176
Liked 1,435 Times in 420 Posts
Default

I like the no dash 28 over a dash 2 27. I have both and the 28 with correct diamind magnas is a sweet old gun. Nothing wrong with a 27 at all but that is my thoughts

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:33 PM
muzhunter muzhunter is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Liked 52 Times in 9 Posts
Default

The only reason im considering the 28 is just that. It is a no-dash model being at least 1960 or older. If they were both -2's it would be a done deal with the model 27 sitting in the safe.

I do have one question. The 28 on the back of the cylinder does not have the serial number stamped into it? I thought all older guns had the number on the back of the cylinder? All it has is an H stamped on it.

Last edited by muzhunter; 01-18-2014 at 12:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:46 PM
arjay's Avatar
arjay arjay is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 15,204
Likes: 92,226
Liked 26,553 Times in 8,467 Posts
Default

Numbering all the parts was coming to an end around 57-58.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-18-2014, 02:19 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 49
Liked 13,416 Times in 3,292 Posts
Default

A 5" 27 should be at least 50% more than a 6" M28. With the box add another $100.

The 28 was designed to be half the gun the 27 is but for reasons I do not understand now the 28s nearly rival the much, much more deluxe and more desirable 27s.

I don't get it.

If you want an investment I'm almost tempted to say get the 28. The way they have nearly caught the 27s in price the past few years I expect them to surpass the much, much better 27s in the future.

Again, I don't get it.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 01-18-2014, 02:40 PM
blackdeuce blackdeuce is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 2,032
Liked 1,264 Times in 409 Posts
Default

I just researched and bought a 27-2 and I couldn't believe how high the prices had gotten, especially for nice ones with boxes.

I'm guessing the 28 came with diamond magnas? If you buy the 28, you might want to snag a set of them. They are getting increasingly harder to find and expensive. I think the old guns are cooler, but I still think the 27-2 is the better buy.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-18-2014, 07:25 PM
Nightowl's Avatar
Nightowl Nightowl is offline
SWCA Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warrensburg, MO USA
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 2,914
Liked 3,404 Times in 1,727 Posts
Default

Definitely the model 27-2! It should always be more valuable than a model 28 due to the better finish and the checkering on the top strap. For some reason, they always feel better to me than the 28, just smoother action. I do not own any model 28s, but have handled quite a few, and carried one for serious business for several years.
__________________
Richard Gillespie
FBINA 102
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-18-2014, 07:38 PM
azmick azmick is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rainbow Valley Arizona
Posts: 285
Likes: 185
Liked 458 Times in 99 Posts
Default

27-2s are pretty common, Model 28 4 screw guns, not so much, but then a little rough around the edges and not so fine a finish pretty much describes me.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-18-2014, 10:22 PM
blackdeuce blackdeuce is offline
Member
Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2 Opinions needed 28 vs 27-2  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 2,032
Liked 1,264 Times in 409 Posts
Default

A 5 inch 27-2 with presentation case just sold on GB for $955.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
642 vs. 637 opinions needed. rayban S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 44 05-31-2021 06:34 AM
opinions needed sc29045 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 9 04-20-2015 08:08 PM
Opinions needed tdstout88 Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 20 07-04-2014 04:41 PM
Opinions needed SuthernShooter The Lounge 24 01-09-2012 01:30 PM
SW CQB Opinions Needed SW CQB 45 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 12 09-09-2010 10:40 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)