|
|
02-09-2014, 01:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 154
Likes: 44
Liked 98 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
1946 Heavy Duty Transition
This is a Heavy Duty Transition shipped July 24, 1946 to Atchison, KS.
The gun came with the gold box pictured and the factory letter.
The stocks are numbered to the gun and unfortunately, both have damage at the tips of the horns.
From my limited knowledge, I do not think the box is original to the gun. However it has the serial number written on the bottom and while I realize anyone could have done that, I am curious if there's any possibility it's original.
I assume the gun would have shipped in a maroon box.
Everything I know about these guns I learned here and 1Aspenhill's website and I thank and blame all of you...
I don't have the free time to post/participate here very often, but try to make time to visit/read when I can.
Heck, I still haven't submitted my SWCA application that Bill was kind enough to send me as a sponsor probably the better part of two years ago now.
I purchased this gun a few years ago, coated it with Corrosion-X, placed it in a ziplock bag and locked it up.
I finally took/made the time to photograph the gun in detail and would be most appreciative of any feedback regarding the box and what appears to be forging (?) flaws in the back-strap.
There's 547 photos of the gun here:
1946 SW 38-44 HD Transitional Photos by tango-papa5 | Photobucket
And here's a few from the album above:
Regards,
tp
|
The Following 23 Users Like Post:
|
1Aspenhill, 1blindref, 29-1, 992B, A10, beagleye, DCWilson, Duster42, j38, JayCeeNC, jjbrewst1, Kansasgunner, lawandorder, LEO918, linde, Mike Q., Old TexMex, quinn, RKmesa, Snakeshift, Tadeus67, Twogunnes, Wiregrassguy |
02-09-2014, 03:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NE
Posts: 320
Likes: 276
Liked 543 Times in 61 Posts
|
|
Very nice! I have one numbered S63601 that that Roy says also shipped in July 1946. It is interesting that numbers so far apart shipped in the same month.
|
02-09-2014, 03:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 4,057
Liked 2,550 Times in 739 Posts
|
|
The 5" heavy duty is balanced in so many ways.
|
02-09-2014, 03:29 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 18,985
Liked 3,531 Times in 1,128 Posts
|
|
Very nice gun.
I'm more impressed that you took 547 pictures of this gun!!
__________________
John
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-09-2014, 03:30 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,354 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
Ok I know it's an early N frame and I like n frames.
|
02-09-2014, 03:41 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cottage Grove,WI
Posts: 4,124
Likes: 1,540
Liked 5,518 Times in 1,650 Posts
|
|
Not sure the box is matching to the Gun,I have never seen the number at an angle like that.
|
02-09-2014, 04:03 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: big sky country montana
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 720
Liked 6,413 Times in 545 Posts
|
|
Hi
Nice HD. The company that your gun was shipped to is the one the KHP used to
order there guns from. The original owner could have been a officer.
They Ordered 75 Transition models of the 357 with 5 inch barrels in 1948.
Jim
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-09-2014, 04:06 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,413 Times in 3,291 Posts
|
|
Often left over boxes got used up with later guns. I think it's entirely possible your gun shipped in that box.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
02-09-2014, 04:50 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,990
Likes: 181
Liked 2,719 Times in 724 Posts
|
|
I have never seen metal flaws like that in a Smith before. The fact that it was not rejected and it was shipped is indicative of just how scarce and in demand any handgun was immediately following the War. The frame was probably pulled from the reject bin and completed to fulfill the order for the KHP.
Bob
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-09-2014, 05:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 154
Likes: 44
Liked 98 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCeeNC
Very nice gun.
I'm more impressed that you took 547 pictures of this gun!!
|
Yeah... pretty ridiculous, huh?
tp
|
02-09-2014, 06:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 14,444
Liked 3,764 Times in 1,784 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bettis1
I have never seen metal flaws like that in a Smith before. The fact that it was not rejected and it was shipped is indicative of just how scarce and in demand any handgun was immediately following the War. The frame was probably pulled from the reject bin and completed to fulfill the order for the KHP.
Bob
|
I agree...that metal flaw is the first I've ever seen. Hellstrom would have had a fit if he saw that!
Since the box is numbered to the gun in pencil rather than grease pencil, it may not be original to the gun. But heck, it'll fly for most of us.
__________________
Bob.
SWCA 1821
|
02-09-2014, 06:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
|
|
TP, nice one. Special.
__________________
Halfway and one more step
|
02-09-2014, 06:52 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Land of Lakes
Posts: 895
Likes: 1,299
Liked 953 Times in 408 Posts
|
|
Drooooool! Nice catch TP!
Dave
__________________
mr mom
Fire Chief, Retired
|
02-09-2014, 09:24 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 18,985
Liked 3,531 Times in 1,128 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tango-papa
Yeah... pretty ridiculous, huh?
tp
|
Nope...just impressed with your thoroughness!
__________________
John
|
02-09-2014, 09:40 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
TP,
Thanks for posting the pics and history of your HD! It sure is a nice one and finding any transition HD with it's original grips is like hitting the lottery! I have to agree with everyone else in that I've never seen the defects in the back strap metal. I think most people don't realize that the 38/44 Heavy Duties were the most N frame gun going out the door after the war! The Heavy Duty, as we have seen, basically carried the N frame guns until 1950. In my opinion, and we all know about opinions, is that all transition HDs were shipped in maroon boxes. S74799 is mint in it's original numbered box, so I truly feel that the 1950 Model went out in gold boxes. Anyway, if you are happy with it in a gold box, then that is all that counts.
Thanks again,
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-13-2014, 08:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 154
Likes: 44
Liked 98 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
I appreciate all the feedback / comments.
The reason for so many photos is that I was considering selling the gun and wanted to make sure any and all flaws were available for a buyer to review. After digging it out from two years in hibernation, I remembered/realized how much I really like the post-war brushed/satin finish. I've decided to keep it for now, along with a late 4" Transition also in blue with the original numbered stocks. A member here has first right of refusal if I ever let it go and it will look good in his collection should that time come.
I was thinking it would be neat to have a 6.5" Transition in blue to make a trio-o-Transitionals. However, due to the rarity of the 6.5" guns, I'm guessing that finding one will be a long shot.
tom32,
Thanks. That is a pretty large spread of numbers.
beagleye,
I concur. The 5" barreled guns are my favorite.
BigBill,
You're in good company...
05CarbonDRZ,
Agreed, I do not think the gun and box were shipped together, but wanted to get an opinion from those in the know.
bmg60,
Thank you for the info about the company where the gun was shipped. Your info has me interested in pursuing further information about who ordered the gun.
SaxonPig,
It would be neat if the gun and box were original to each other, eh?
bettis1,
When I first noticed the flaws, I was very disappointed. But the more I inspected them, the more I had thoughts similar to your comments.
S&WIowegan,
The flaws are the first I've seen as well...
Maybe it's a one-off frame...?
Yep, that's it, it's a one-off... and worth one meeelion dollars!
Old TexMex,
Thanks. Curious what makes you call it "special"?
mr-mom,
Thanks - it's a neat piece of history.
JayCeeNC,
While you're impressed, my wife calls it OCD and rolls her eyes whenever I get the camera out.
1Aspenhill,
Thank you for your comments. And just so you know, I blame you and thank you for my interest in the Heavy Duty. One of these days I'll get the 4" lettered and photographed and post it up. I actually purchased the 4" with feedback/recommendation from you and dacoontz. With regards to the box, did the gold (Heavy Duty) boxes even exist in 1946?
Regards,
tp
Last edited by tango-papa; 02-13-2014 at 08:51 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-16-2014, 01:31 AM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
TP,
I don't think anyone knows.
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
02-16-2014, 07:49 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St Augustine
Posts: 2,362
Likes: 2,316
Liked 5,696 Times in 848 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tango-papa
I appreciate all the feedback / comments.
………
1Aspenhill,
Thank you for your comments. And just so you know, I blame you and thank you for my interest in the Heavy Duty …….
Regards,
tp
|
so it appears that I'm not the only one that Bill has indoctrinated into the "HD Cult"
__________________
Rick
SWCA #2727 , SWHF #435
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-16-2014, 12:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blindref
so it appears that I'm not the only one that Bill has indoctrinated into the "HD Cult"
|
No, indeed...you are not Robinson Crusoe.
__________________
Halfway and one more step
|
02-16-2014, 01:48 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 154
Likes: 44
Liked 98 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blindref
so it appears that I'm not the only one that Bill has indoctrinated into the "HD Cult"
|
It's true...
I gots the Feevah!
tp
Last edited by tango-papa; 02-16-2014 at 01:56 PM.
|
02-16-2014, 02:15 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,233
Likes: 35,026
Liked 10,803 Times in 3,683 Posts
|
|
Very nice .38-44, TP!
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
02-16-2014, 10:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 154
Likes: 44
Liked 98 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
Very nice .38-44, TP!
|
Thanks.
Ashford, Alabama, huh?
I went to high school at UCLA...
The Upper Corner of Lower Alabama.
My Dad was career Army and stationed at Rucker for four years during my youth.
tp
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:03 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,233
Likes: 35,026
Liked 10,803 Times in 3,683 Posts
|
|
yeah you are a Wiregrass redneck. Welcome!
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
02-17-2014, 12:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 269
Likes: 1,383
Liked 133 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
t-p,
S66278 is a 4" H-D that has an earlier numbered cylinder and is reblued. Wish I knew if the original cylinder was jugged by an overload or maybe ruined by someone trying to rechamber it to 357, or taken apart and the cylinder got lost. Sure is fun and goes with a prewar 5" and 1950 Outdoorsman that likes about any 38 load from mild to hot. Gary
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|