• Update – 12:30 PM EST
    Attachments are now working, and all members can once again upload files.
    We are currently testing URL redirects and other miscellaneous features across the site.
    Thank you for your continued patience and support during this migration.

    Prefer a darker look? You can switch between light and dark modes in your account settings:
    smith-wessonforum.com/account/preferences

1917 holster: what's the "tail" for?

VIgun

New member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I see a lot of repro 1917 holsters (for the S&W and the Colt) have a thong of sorts hanging from the muzzle end. What's it for? It's too short to go around the thigh, and anyway, period pics don't show this thong.
pic_4660.jpg
 
Many USGI holsters of WW vintage have this feature.
Mostly done in the field (bored?).
Maybe decoration, maybe spare cordage.
Look at enough vintage holsters and you're bound to see some.
Reminiscent of tassel on uniforms...

AECEAFAE-0EED-49C9-9307-151356456456.jpg


ml8PwMrc-0gOrV1awL5dIow.jpg
 
Many USGI holsters of WW vintage have this feature.
Mostly done in the field (bored?).
Maybe decoration, maybe spare cordage.
Look at enough vintage holsters and you're bound to see some.
Reminiscent of tassel on uniforms...

AECEAFAE-0EED-49C9-9307-151356456456.jpg


ml8PwMrc-0gOrV1awL5dIow.jpg

I'm sure that my dad didn't add it...and it looks long enough to go around a thigh.
 
It's a tie-down strap. Or thong. Or whatever you want to call it.

It's a carry over from Western-style holsters. Keeps the holster from flopping around when you're on horseback or running. It shouldn't be too short to go around the thigh.
 
Last edited:
I know that both the M1909 and M1917 holsters originally had them. I've always thought it was a leg tie-down. Probably not used much for that purpose, possibly more for cavalry use if anything.
 
It's a tie down, and very useful if you are crawling in and out of a small area, like a turret or hatch or cock pit, etc. and don't want your holster always getting hung up on something and slowing you down. Ed.
 
I stand corrected, updated, informed and duly noted.

Thanks!

Didn't know they were issued that way, but makes perfect horse sense.
 
Didn't know they were issued that way, but makes perfect horse sense.

These tie downs (or "Thong" as described by the military) were made of elk skin. They were not only issued with the holster by the military they were supplied with the holster by the manufacturer. The Government specifications called for these thongs to be provided as part of the holster.
 
These tie downs (or "Thong" as described by the military) were made of elk skin. They were not only issued with the holster by the military they were supplied with the holster by the manufacturer. The Government specifications called for these thongs to be provided as part of the holster.

Sometimes, the neatest tidbits of history are in the fine details. :)
 
"These tie downs (or "Thong" as described by the military) were made of elk skin. They were not only issued with the holster by the military they were supplied with the holster by the manufacturer. The Government specifications called for these thongs to be provided as part of the holster."

Then, one day when on leave, a cavalry corporal ran out of money whilst cavorting with a 'soiled dove.' She took said thong as part payment, later began using it as her under-attire and the rest is history. :eek:

And that's my story and I'm sticking to it.....:cool:
 
I see a lot of repro 1917 holsters (for the S&W and the Colt) have a thong of sorts hanging from the muzzle end. What's it for? It's too short to go around the thigh, and anyway, period pics don't show this thong.

If it's too short for a leg tie down that's because it's a repro holster, the originals were long enough. I have a repro with a tie down thong in two pieces. When the spiral wrap is undone, one piece is unattached to the holster making it totally useless as well.
 
Last edited:
Riding at a gallop, you probably did not want the holstered revolver flapping around, hence the tie down. It is hard for us to understand how important the cavalry was in the US Army back in the early days of the last century. If nothing else, they certainly had a lot of say regarding how a sidearm should be carried.

An obvious example of this influence:
The M1917 holster carries the revolver butt forward, cavalry-style. A mounted soldier was to draw his sabre with his right hand so that meant he had to draw the revolver with his left hand. At this point, I guess he was supposed to hold the reins in his teeth! :D

Talk of sabre charges on horseback may seem horribly anachronistic on a battlefield dominated by the machine gun, poison gas, etc. Maybe it's true what they say about generals always fighting the previous war.
 
Back
Top