|
|
12-02-2015, 04:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
.22 Ladysmith 3rd Model For Comment
I have been photographing this 3rd model .22 Ladysmith today. While searching the forum I see that George (aka Model52guy) received a letter on his a few weeks ago. I guess I should order a letter on this one too.
.22 Ladysmith 3rd model with 6" barrel
S/N 22264
22 S&W CTG
SMITH & WESSON SPRINGFIELD MASS. U.S.A.
PAT'D AUG.4.96. OCT.8.01 NOV.10.03 FEB.6.06 SEPT.14.09
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
The Following 12 Users Like Post:
|
DCWilson, DGT, g8rb8, H Richard, mbliss57, Model52guy, mscook, raljr1, raylan007, red9, vytoland, Wiregrassguy |
12-02-2015, 04:36 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,256
Likes: 11,946
Liked 20,609 Times in 8,587 Posts
|
|
Dana,
You not only have a very nice 3rd Model with a scarce 6" barrel, but it's also a Target Model!
I seldom get letters on newer guns, but the older guns can have very interesting letters from the days when guns could be shipped to individuals.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-02-2015, 04:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Dana,
You not only have a very nice 3rd Model with a scarce 6" barrel, but it's also a Target Model!
I seldom get letters on newer guns, but the older guns can have very interesting letters from the days when guns could be shipped to individuals.
|
Thanks Hondo44.
I had read in my price guide that the 6" barrel was rare and added 50% to the value. Other than the 6" barrel can you tell me what makes this a Target Model?
__________________
Dana K. Williams
Last edited by weaponscollector; 12-02-2015 at 04:49 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-02-2015, 05:10 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,256
Likes: 11,946
Liked 20,609 Times in 8,587 Posts
|
|
Yes, the adjustable rear sight, not the 6" barrel. Targets are very rare. Found with more 6" barrel models but not exclusive to the 6" barrel guns. An 85% adder, but that's probably low. A 6" barrel with fixed sights is actually more rare with a 95% adder.
Here's a fixed sight 3rd model:
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 12-02-2015 at 05:41 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-02-2015, 05:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Yes, the adjustable rear sight, not the 6" barrel. Targets are very rare. Found with more 6" barrel models but not exclusive to the 6" barrel guns. An 85% adder, but that's probably low. A 6" barrel with fixed sights is actually more rare with a 95% adder.
|
Thanks for the info Jim. That is very helpful and much appreciated.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-02-2015, 05:17 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,988
Likes: 3,056
Liked 14,412 Times in 5,485 Posts
|
|
Target sights are added just like any other frame sizes of S&Ws. Standard fixed sights would have been half moon front sight and a slot for a rear sight, while yours has a pinned Paine style front sight and an adjustable rear sight. Target sights could have been added to any barrel length gun for around $4.00 in the teens.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Last edited by glowe; 12-02-2015 at 05:20 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-02-2015, 07:05 PM
|
US Veteran SWCA Founding Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
|
|
Before you order a letter, because you are assuming the gun is an original target model, I would suggest that you make sure it is and left the factory as a target gun. You do that by removing the read sight & sight base and see if the gun's serial number is stamped on the bottom of the base. If so, it's left S&W in target configuration. If no serial number, then the target sights were added later and you may also find a date code on the left grip frame for the month & year that the alteration was done. Ed.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-02-2015, 09:21 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Haslet Tx
Posts: 909
Likes: 2,562
Liked 1,526 Times in 460 Posts
|
|
Dana,
Nice looking lady smith. I took mine to the Tulsa gun show a month ago and did a little show and tell with the bigger S&W collector/dealers. Also showed it at the S&W forum booth. The biggest dealer there said he had seen very few 6" target models. Interesting yours has smooth grips and mine has checkered. Did you check for a SN on the right hand grip? Should be in pencil. Mine was hard to read with my old eyes. Took pictures of mine, then played with the brightness and contrast with microsoft picture editor. The serial number was fairly clear in the enhanced pictures.
Be careful if you remove the rear sight to check for a serial number, I ended up using a jewelers screwdriver as the screws are small.
My Ladysmith SN 236XX was shipped Feb 1914. yours 222XX probably before that. Definitely worth a letter after the first of the year.
George
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-03-2015, 11:24 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by opoefc
Before you order a letter, because you are assuming the gun is an original target model, I would suggest that you make sure it is and left the factory as a target gun. You do that by removing the read sight & sight base and see if the gun's serial number is stamped on the bottom of the base. If so, it's left S&W in target configuration. If no serial number, then the target sights were added later and you may also find a date code on the left grip frame for the month & year that the alteration was done. Ed.
|
Thanks for the suggestion opoefc.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
12-03-2015, 11:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Model52guy
Dana,
Nice looking lady smith. I took mine to the Tulsa gun show a month ago and did a little show and tell with the bigger S&W collector/dealers. Also showed it at the S&W forum booth. The biggest dealer there said he had seen very few 6" target models. Interesting yours has smooth grips and mine has checkered. Did you check for a SN on the right hand grip? Should be in pencil. Mine was hard to read with my old eyes. Took pictures of mine, then played with the brightness and contrast with microsoft picture editor. The serial number was fairly clear in the enhanced pictures.
Be careful if you remove the rear sight to check for a serial number, I ended up using a jewelers screwdriver as the screws are small.
My Ladysmith SN 236XX was shipped Feb 1914. yours 222XX probably before that. Definitely worth a letter after the first of the year.
George
|
I looked Model52guy, but couldn't detected a penciled number on the grips. When / if I remove the rear sight, I'll post some photos here.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
Last edited by weaponscollector; 12-03-2015 at 11:27 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-03-2015, 12:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Unfortunately there seems to be no serial number under the rear sight.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-04-2015, 02:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
I have a "small" selection of S&W Ladysmiths. Should I letter them all? What is the best way to choose what is worth lettering?
__________________
Dana K. Williams
Last edited by weaponscollector; 12-04-2015 at 03:56 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-04-2015, 03:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 2,515
Liked 1,682 Times in 703 Posts
|
|
__________________
NRA LIFE
Reserve Officer 9yrs
Last edited by flagman1776; 12-04-2015 at 03:46 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-04-2015, 03:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flagman1776
I bought my Second model in Rhode Island... not far from Springfield, Mass My SN was stamped on the hard rubber grip... same size as the butt stamping.
|
Wow! That sure looks nice.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
12-04-2015, 08:01 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Haslet Tx
Posts: 909
Likes: 2,562
Liked 1,526 Times in 460 Posts
|
|
Dana,
My 'rule of thumb' for getting a letter is:
Gun is probably worth more than $1500, is older than 50 years and the ship date cannot be certain of the year, by the guys on this site. The serious collectors keep data bases on a lot of the more popular models and can bracket the ship date pretty close. I think most of your Ladysmith collection should qualify for letters.
Did you look under the grips of the target model for a S&W repair date? Should be a month.2 digit year with a symbol, indicating the date it was returned for refit/repair. If the target sights were added by the factory, it should have a date on the frame.
Regards,
George
|
12-07-2015, 02:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Model52guy
Dana,
Did you look under the grips of the target model for a S&W repair date? Should be a month.2 digit year with a symbol, indicating the date it was returned for refit/repair. If the target sights were added by the factory, it should have a date on the frame.
Regards,
George
|
Hi George, thanks for the advice on factory letters.
I see no markings on the frame underneath the grips. Using the scanner some pencil markings on inside of the right side's grip can be seen, but I can't decipher them. I'll attach an image.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-07-2015, 08:25 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Haslet Tx
Posts: 909
Likes: 2,562
Liked 1,526 Times in 460 Posts
|
|
Dana,
Yup, that's the serial number, now, just have to figure out how to read it. I did try a "black-light". The second one I tried "an automotive one for detecting leaks", I was able to see it better .
The best luck was using the digital photo and playing with the brightness and contrast using Microsoft office picture manager.
Going to gun shows over that last 40 years, I have never seen a Ladysmith collection like yours. You have quite the rare collection. Most people have never seen a Ladysmith much less a collection like yours
|
12-07-2015, 09:15 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,256
Likes: 11,946
Liked 20,609 Times in 8,587 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by weaponscollector
Hi George, thanks for the advice on factory letters.
I see no markings on the frame underneath the grips. Using the scanner some pencil markings on inside of the right side's grip can be seen, but I can't decipher them. I'll attach an image.
|
Most read the other way, so it's upside down. Turn it over/around and see if it 'looks' like the gun's serial #.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
12-08-2015, 04:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Model52guy
Dana,
Yup, that's the serial number, now, just have to figure out how to read it. I did try a "black-light". The second one I tried "an automotive one for detecting leaks", I was able to see it better .
The best luck was using the digital photo and playing with the brightness and contrast using Microsoft office picture manager.
Going to gun shows over that last 40 years, I have never seen a Ladysmith collection like yours. You have quite the rare collection. Most people have never seen a Ladysmith much less a collection like yours
|
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try to find a black-light. I have access to VERY powerful software tools, but in this case the lack of contrast makes pulling the pencil information out of the background difficult. Give it a try.
I can't take any credit for the collection. These were part of my Dad's extensive collection. Here are a few shots from his museum in St. Augustine. They were taken in the early 70's.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-08-2015, 04:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
Most read the other way, so it's upside down. Turn it over/around and see if it 'looks' like the gun's serial #.
|
Here you go Jim. I've flipped the grip around 180 deg and played with the contrast.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
12-08-2015, 04:55 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,256
Likes: 11,946
Liked 20,609 Times in 8,587 Posts
|
|
I believe it's oriented correctly now. Reading these scribbled #s can be a bit of an art form. I looked at a few of my ladysmith stock #s to refresh my "reading familiarity".
It's fairly easy to pick out repetitive digits like the 2s, but unfortunately I don't see them and am afraid the stock #s appear to be non-matching to your gun.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
12-08-2015, 05:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
I believe it's oriented correctly now. Reading these scribbled #s can be a bit of an art form. I looked at a few of my ladysmith stock #s to refresh my "reading familiarity".
It's fairly easy to pick out repetitive digits like the 2s, but unfortunately I don't see them and am afraid the stock #s appear to be non-matching to your gun.
|
You could be right Jim. I am trying to find someone with a black-light to see if that helps make the writing more legible.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
12-10-2015, 07:07 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,600
Likes: 3,716
Liked 8,957 Times in 3,559 Posts
|
|
You can also sometimes pick up the numbers using a bright white light held at an angle to the stock surface. Obviously, never try to clean away the crud in an attempt to reveal the numbers. (Don't ask me how I know this)
That's one hell of a museum. Is it still there? If not, did you get all of those fine guns?
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
12-10-2015, 07:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSR III
You can also sometimes pick up the numbers using a bright white light held at an angle to the stock surface. Obviously, never try to clean away the crud in an attempt to reveal the numbers. (Don't ask me how I know this)
That's one hell of a museum. Is it still there? If not, did you get all of those fine guns?
|
I have very good lighting options, but none of them helped. There is just too little contrast, and the pencil marks in this case don't reflect light.
The museum closed in the 80's. Most of the collection was sold over the years, but I still have some of the things Dad Loved the most. Most of these items predate the war of 1812, and many are are hundreds of years older than that. If Lee says it is ok, I'll post some links.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
12-10-2015, 08:02 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Haslet Tx
Posts: 909
Likes: 2,562
Liked 1,526 Times in 460 Posts
|
|
Wow, what a collection!!!
Looking at the grips. I could see the first digit maybe a two, but the second and third look to have a different angle. So, I would guess, probably not matching. It would still be very interesting if you are able to come up with something to be able to read the numbers. I think this is an ongoing issue for collectors. You would be a hero on this site if you get it figured out!
|
12-10-2015, 08:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Model52guy
Wow, what a collection!!!
Looking at the grips. I could see the first digit maybe a two, but the second and third look to have a different angle. So, I would guess, probably not matching. It would still be very interesting if you are able to come up with something to be able to read the numbers. I think this is an ongoing issue for collectors. You would be a hero on this site if you get it figured out!
|
Thanks Model52guy. I have a few more interesting S&W to post and many common Lemon Squeezers.
The photos above were made on a flat bed scanner. I have a much higher resolution scanner that I haven't tried yet, but I also want to try the black-light as suggested by George (aka Model52guy)
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
12-11-2015, 03:59 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 104
Liked 3,176 Times in 605 Posts
|
|
I was lucky enough to find a really beautiful 6" target some years ago.....
__________________
Terry
SWCA, SWHS, IWLA, NRA
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-07-2016, 04:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by weaponscollector
I have a "small" selection of S&W Ladysmiths. Should I letter them all? What is the best way to choose what is worth lettering?
|
While trying to decide which one of these Ladysmiths I should request a factory letter on, I notice one has a S/N the number 977 followed by a Star.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
Last edited by weaponscollector; 01-07-2016 at 05:29 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-07-2016, 04:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,711
Likes: 245
Liked 29,236 Times in 14,143 Posts
|
|
The star usually indicates that it was returned to the factory for some kind of service.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-07-2016, 05:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
The star usually indicates that it was returned to the factory for some kind of service.
|
Thanks DWalt. It looks like a first model Ladysmith. I've added photos to the post above so people can see the star. The barrel appears to be blued. Maybe it was factory replaced.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
Last edited by weaponscollector; 01-07-2016 at 06:02 PM.
|
01-28-2016, 05:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
I have received my factory letter for the .22 Ladysmith 3rd model with 6" barrel that opened this post. It seems the pistol did ship with the adjustable rear sights, and it shipped to Van Camp Hardware & Iron Company, in Indianapolis In, on March 24th of 1914.
Thanks Mr. Jinks.
Van Camp Hardware Photos from W.H. Bass Photo Company Collection, Indiana Historical Society.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
Last edited by weaponscollector; 01-28-2016 at 05:39 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-28-2016, 05:47 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
Your Ladysmith with the 977 SN shipped late 1902 or January 1903. I have one a few numbers higher that shipped Jan. 1903.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-28-2016, 06:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
Your Ladysmith with the 977 SN shipped late 1902 or January 1903. I have one a few numbers higher that shipped Jan. 1903.
|
I have a factory letter for that Ladysmith too.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
Last edited by weaponscollector; 01-29-2016 at 08:05 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-30-2016, 07:38 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Haslet Tx
Posts: 909
Likes: 2,562
Liked 1,526 Times in 460 Posts
|
|
Dana
It definitely was worth getting the letter on the target model. Nice to know it was shipped that way.
You have a very interesting collection, not that many survivors from 1902.
George
|
02-15-2016, 06:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 32
Liked 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
User H Richard notice a dark spot in one of my photos and asked me about it. He has a great eye, because I hadn't noticed, but there is a notch at the top of the force cone. It looks like it may have happened when the hole was drilled for mounting the adjustable rear sight, but my factory letter suggest the sights were installed at the factory.
That area, the cylinder and the barrel are so clean this Ladysmith couldn't have been used too much.
__________________
Dana K. Williams
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|