S&W pre model 10 2"

jjroth63

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Messages
9
Reaction score
18
Hi,
I have a S&W hand ejector revolver, I think it is a pre model 10. It is a 38 S&W SPL CTG 2" with serial # C 165371. It is blue with original grips, half moon front sight, frame groove rear sight.
Please let me know if I am correct, I am looking for year of manufacture and approximate value and any other information.
Thanks,
John



S&W 10 2INCH-4.jpg

S&W 10 2INCH-3.jpg

S&W 10 2INCH-1.jpg

S&W 10 2INCH-2.jpg
 
In my area, one very similar to this (1952 vintage 2 in similar condition with original grips) sold 2 years go for $425. Hope this helps.
 
.38 M&P Pre-Model 10 serial C151961 was shipped in February 1952. But, .38 M&P Pre-Model 10 serial C156210 was shipped in March 1951. Which just illustrates that S&W did NOT ship in SN order. When JP@AK wakes up and votes, maybe his database is more precise.


I think the previous poster is pretty close on value.
 
I have C165078 which I think is 1951 but don't have a letter. Paid $432 for it but that was six years ago. Wouldn't expect to find it where I shop now for less than $500; likely would be $599 and negotiated from there. Enjoy.

Jeff
SWCA #1457
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3882.jpg
    IMG_3882.jpg
    159.5 KB · Views: 101
I have C168xxx, 2" which shipped Apr 1952, so I would also guess mid 1951.

Welcome to the S&W Forum, stick around, there are a lot of like minded people hanging around here.
 
Last edited:
The closest one on my list shipped in March, 1951. But, as Guy noted, they did not ship in serial order, so you can easily have a few months leeway in either direction.
 
Yea, this really illustrates S&W's habit of not shipping in SN sequence. Not even close. My 2" SB, C188067 shipped July 6, 1951 to Sharp Horsey Hardware, right here in hot lanta.
 
Welcome to the forum.
That is a fine revolver , very classy.
Please consider calling your revolver a Military and Police , or M&P , because that's what it is.

I lucked out on this S prefix , 1947 , last year. Set me back about $470.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0972.jpg
    IMG_0972.jpg
    168 KB · Views: 91
The closest 2" M&P I have listed to your C165371 is C16888x which shipped in 4/52. While any M&P snubby in higher condition is desirable and will command a premium price vs. a contemporary M&P having a longer barrel, those few snubbies which were made prior to WWII can be very valuable, while postwar (long action) examples in the S series are generally more desirable than C series snubbies.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to the forum.
That is a fine revolver , very classy.
Please consider calling your revolver a Military and Police , or M&P , because that's what it is.

I lucked out on this S prefix , 1947 , last year. Set me back about $470.

Good call. A pistol is a semi-auto and a wheel gun, a revolver. At least that's what we were taught in the Marine Corps. Just saying. Big Larry
 
Good call. A pistol is a semi-auto and a wheel gun, a revolver. At least that's what we were taught in the Marine Corps. Just saying. Big Larry

I have that habit too........even though my grandfather loved to call them both "pistolas".

I think I do it simply to keep folks from correcting me as they see fit, but to be honest I tend to call most anything that goes bang a gun, and all ships are boats to me. At a young age various soda pops were simply "Cokes". (I might have done the ship/boat thing just to annoy the Navy folk while on "boat" deployment. ;))

I know, there's simply no hope for me now.
 
Interestingly, Sturm, Ruger always listed their semi-autos as "pistols" and their wheel guns as "revolvers." They still do.

If you contemplate the history a bit, you realize that handguns of the muzzle-loading, black powder variety were mostly single shots (with some obvious exceptions) and were routinely called "pistols." So, the early revolvers tended to get that moniker as well. When auto-loaders came along in the late 1800s, they were called "pistols" also. The revolvers gradually earned the right to be called by their description (they had revolving cylinders) and the auto-loaders retained the "pistol" name. almost exclusively. It seems this was particularly true in the military.

None of this really "proves" anything. I just find it interesting, from an historical perspective. :cool:
 
Back
Top