|
|
12-11-2020, 04:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 161
Likes: 190
Liked 1,194 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
What Do I have? S&W 1917 455
|
The Following 23 Users Like Post:
|
.357magger, Absalom, cinnwalt, daddio202, Eltioloco, fdover, Hunter Keith, Jack Flash, JH1951, jmace57, jscheck, mrcvs, Muley Gil, Narragansett, pawncop, quinn, Russell Cottle, sigp220.45, StrawHat, The Gila Bender, Thinnes, Vidd, Wiregrassguy |
12-11-2020, 06:58 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
You don't have a 1917 as that was a US Army model in .45 ACP. Yours is a .455, MKII, Hand Ejector. AKA the .455 British Service Revolver. It is the 2nd version of this model. The first being about 5000 triple locks in .455. The triple locks have a shrouded extractor. The 2nd version has an unshrouded extractor due to British complaints about the precision machining of the triple lock. It looks like a Model 1917 because they use the same design. Your gun was made ca. 1916 as I interpolate the SCSW table. Someone like Hondo44 will come along and narrow that down for you and may even be able to tell you what month it was made.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Last edited by Wiregrassguy; 12-11-2020 at 07:03 AM.
|
The Following 12 Users Like Post:
|
Absalom, H Richard, Hondo44, James E. McCall, JH1951, lamarw, Mikebiker, model3sw, mrcvs, Muley Gil, Russell Cottle, Thinnes |
12-11-2020, 07:59 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,735
Likes: 12,900
Liked 39,596 Times in 10,066 Posts
|
|
Nice example to the 2nd type 455
Many of these were modified to fire 45 colts. With a good picture of the rear face of your cylinder we could probably tell you if yours has. They are great old guns. I am lucky enough to have both a triple lock and a 2nd model.
There is a complete thread on these here please join it
.455 British Svc Revolver Research Thread
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-11-2020, 08:19 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
Quote:
I am lucky enough to have both a triple lock and a 2nd model.
|
Yes. So do I and here they are. The .455 2nd is a commercial model that shipped to Shapleigh Hardware in December 1917.
.455 HE, 2nd Model, Commercial
.455 HE, 1st Model, Triple Lock, British Service Revolver. This gun was converted to .45 Colt by shaving the cylinder face and reaming the cylinder after released from service.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Last edited by Wiregrassguy; 12-11-2020 at 08:22 AM.
|
The Following 15 Users Like Post:
|
.357magger, cinnwalt, Hondo44, James E. McCall, JH1951, jscheck, Mikebiker, Muley Gil, Narragansett, quinn, Russell Cottle, Texas Star, The Gila Bender, Thinnes, Vidd |
12-11-2020, 09:40 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,735
Likes: 12,900
Liked 39,596 Times in 10,066 Posts
|
|
Mine.
The 2nd type is unconverted
The Triple lock was converted by reaming and partial recess for thicker 45 colt rims and still fires the 455 as they have a wider rim.
Last edited by steelslaver; 12-11-2020 at 09:42 AM.
|
The Following 13 Users Like Post:
|
cinnwalt, Hondo44, James E. McCall, JH1951, jscheck, Mikebiker, Muley Gil, old tanker, quinn, Russell Cottle, Thinnes, Vidd, Wiregrassguy |
12-11-2020, 09:41 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
MikeBiker, from Hondo44's thread referenced above, serial number 35711 shipped on Jan 6, 1916 and that's only a few hundred units from your 36099 gun. S&W was knocking these out in quantity during that period as they were up into the 50,000 serials by April. So, I think your gun shipped in January 1916.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Last edited by Wiregrassguy; 12-11-2020 at 09:42 AM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-11-2020, 10:38 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,256
Likes: 11,946
Liked 20,610 Times in 8,587 Posts
|
|
Wow, that's a nice one compared to the majority we see!
Yours is a #3 version below:
1. “44 Hand Ejector-1st Model” Triple Lock, 812 (666 military & 146 commercially sold) in the 44 Spl # series factory converted to 455. Serial #s are listed in Neal & Jinks S&W 1857 – 1945, Pgs 204-205. Only marked Smith & Wesson with no cartridge marking.
2. “455 Hand Ejector-1st Model” Triple Lock #1 thru ~#5800* (previously thought to be 5461, and several higher #s in this range shipped commercial)
3. “455 Hand Ejector-2nd Model” ~#5801 (previously thought to be 5462) thru 74755.
4. “44 Hand Ejector-1st Model” Triple Lock 691 assembled at the end of the British contract but sold on the commercial market 1916-17, built from remaining TL frames and numbered in the 44 Spl # series ~ 12,000 – 14,XXX range. (Although some are known to have been shipped to or wound up in England).
Go to my post #223 for the database info, page 5 to get an idea of when yours likely shipped:
.455 British Svc Revolver Research Thread
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-11-2020, 11:54 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
The gun appears to be all-original and has standard Enfield acceptance stamps and the crossed-pennant proof, plus the opposing-broad-arrows mark for a gun “sold out of service”, but apparently no post-service British commercial proofing.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-11-2020, 12:01 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Outer Uzbekistan
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 8,604
Liked 11,689 Times in 3,062 Posts
|
|
Fiocci makes ammo for these. They're fun, very low recoil shooters.
__________________
SWCA #3356, SWHF#611
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
cinnwalt, James E. McCall, jscheck, mh51, Mikebiker, Muley Gil, NavySCPO, Russell Cottle, Texas Star, Thinnes, Wiregrassguy |
12-12-2020, 02:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Coastal NC
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 2,343
Liked 4,674 Times in 1,600 Posts
|
|
The Brits sure do love to stamp up a nice gun though.
__________________
Ret'd LEO
SWCA #2275
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-12-2020, 03:10 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
Whenever I see one of these stamped-up BSR's, I get this mental picture of a 250 lb., mustached Beef Eater with a punch and 5 lb. sledge.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-12-2020, 08:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Escaping CA to OR in 2024
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 1,167
Liked 1,470 Times in 593 Posts
|
|
I have serial #64344 that made it as far as Shapleighs in St Louis in 1917 and as a result carries no British proofs. It's still in 455 which makes me wonder - was there a US market for this caliber at one time? As evidenced by all the rechambering to 45 Colt it must have faded quickly, or remained as a much less popular option.
Is there any differentiation made (and by "differentiation" I mean $$$ ) between a 455 that stayed stateside rather than being sledgehammered up by our Britics friends?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-12-2020, 09:00 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
The guns shipped to Shapleigh in December 1917 are commercial versions and are relatively rare. If they haven't been modified to .45 Colt and are in excellent condition, they should bring low 4 digits. Here is my .455 HE with period holster that shipped to Shapleigh in December 1917.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-12-2020, 10:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Escaping CA to OR in 2024
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 1,167
Liked 1,470 Times in 593 Posts
|
|
^
Good to know, thank you.
No holster, but my 455 is in the same condition. I think I got good pricing because of a "no one likes" assumption of the 455 caliber.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-13-2020, 02:56 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,256
Likes: 11,946
Liked 20,610 Times in 8,587 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
The guns shipped to Shapleigh in December 1917 are commercial versions and are relatively rare. If they haven't been modified to .45 Colt and are in excellent condition, they should bring low 4 digits. Here is my .455 HE with period holster that shipped to Shapleigh in December 1917.
|
Many of those were purchased by the US home guard and of course didn't see any battle time or much use at all except target practice. Couldn't have been much ammo around for them; some from Colt and Dominion in Canada I suppose.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-13-2020, 03:30 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
Jim, somehow I get this picture from your comments of a home guard carrying a holstered .455 with one bullet in his shirt pocket, a la Barney Fife.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-13-2020, 03:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,534
Likes: 1,186
Liked 18,481 Times in 7,315 Posts
|
|
You just got the same schoolin' that I did when I first posted this one and called it the same thing!
It and the 1917 are contemporaries and very similar, but not the same.
Fine looking specimen you've got there. Yours looks a lot more original and pristine than mine. I really like the looks of the grips on yours - mine has repro smooth non-dished service stocks. But they are OK for a shooter. Mine has 0% original finish since it has been hard chromed. It also has had the front sight converted to a semi-ramp profile, and has had its cylinder bored deeper to accept 45 Colt ammo.
Even though the .455 ammo is a lot harder to get, and the finish isn't as durable, I'd rather have yours than mine. Not that I'm complaining about what I got, 'cause its a fine shooter. Just not an original collectible like yours.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns & money...
Last edited by BC38; 12-13-2020 at 01:05 PM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-13-2020, 03:34 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
BC38, that's a purty revolver!
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
12-13-2020, 11:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 638
Liked 2,049 Times in 711 Posts
|
|
They are nice. I have 2, one’s still.455 while the other is .45lc. You will enjoy yours.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-13-2020, 01:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,534
Likes: 1,186
Liked 18,481 Times in 7,315 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
BC38, that's a purty revolver!
|
Thanks! It shoots as good as it looks too.
Somebody started with a really nice one to make it, and they did a good job on it. The rollmarks are so crisp you'd think it was an original finish if you didn't know better.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns & money...
Last edited by BC38; 12-13-2020 at 01:10 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-14-2020, 08:32 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,322
Likes: 34,050
Liked 10,995 Times in 3,962 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Corp
The Brits sure do love to stamp up a nice gun though.
|
Yes, and they would stamp the heck out of them coming and going.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-14-2020, 12:59 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,155 Times in 7,409 Posts
|
|
Colt didn't load ammo. But Winchester and Dominion/CIL in Canada did load .455 Colt.
This used the longer MK I length .455 case and used a 265 grain lead bullet at a nominal 750 FPS. Service MK II loads only made about 600-625 FPS.
What .455 ammo was available here was prob. commercial .455 Colt.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-14-2020, 01:11 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,155 Times in 7,409 Posts
|
|
I had a very nice second model .455, but never found .455 ammo when I could afford any as a poor college student. What there was was MK VI FMJ sold as surplus after WW II.
I sold that gun to eat when a GI Education Bill check was late.
Many here really need to study .455 Webley ammo in all six Marks. All work fine in .455 revolvers and some also use the prior .476 cartridge.
The UK declared .455 revolvers and .455 autos obsolete in 1947 and many were sold here in the 1950's and '60's. My first handgun was a Webley MK VI converted to .45 ACP. I was 13; my mother bought it. By 16, I had a Colt M-1917 .45.
I liked movies and books about British forces in colonial India and Africa and was very keen to get that Webley. Montgomery Ward's, remember them?
Last edited by Texas Star; 12-14-2020 at 01:24 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-14-2020, 02:02 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,322
Likes: 34,050
Liked 10,995 Times in 3,962 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsf
I have serial #64344 that made it as far as Shapleighs in St Louis in 1917 and as a result carries no British proofs. It's still in 455 which makes me wonder - was there a US market for this caliber at one time? As evidenced by all the rechambering to 45 Colt it must have faded quickly, or remained as a much less popular option. ...
|
Just from memory, I think the 1940 Shooter's Bible (I have a reprint) showed that Colt continued to chamber their New Service in .455 at least until 1940 and ammunition was still manufactured by the major companies. I believe S&W did the same.
I assume this was mainly for export to Canada and perhaps South Africa, Australia, NZ, etc., but I don't know. Maybe there was a niche market in the US.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-14-2020, 05:32 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,256
Likes: 11,946
Liked 20,610 Times in 8,587 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsf
I have serial #64344 that made it as far as Shapleighs in St Louis in 1917 and as a result carries no British proofs. It's still in 455 which makes me wonder - was there a US market for this caliber at one time? As evidenced by all the rechambering to 45 Colt it must have faded quickly, or remained as a much less popular option.
|
The only "niche" market for .455s that existed in the US at the time was as alternatives, because of the British purchasing commission literally buying up all suitable caliber guns in the US for it's civilian wartime defense of England, including commercially sold overrun .455s. Some of which, based on their markings, actually saw service in the trenches.
Many 'overrun' guns, .44 HE TL 1st Models in .455, .455 HE TL 1st Models, and .455 HE 2nd models, were sold into the commercial market both here and abroad thru the end of the war.
To my knowledge and based on some research, I can't find any record of S&W .455s being produced by S&W after completing the contract guns in 1916. This includes .455s shipped to the Canadian government. Before the Brit contract for service revolvers we do know that a very few .455s built on the .44 HE TL 1st models were ordered and shipped out of the country.
Any .455s produced after the war would have been special order built on the 1917 or .44 2nd model frames (virtually the same frames) but no indication of that is available.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsf
Is there any differentiation made (and by "differentiation" I mean $$$ ) between a 455 that stayed stateside rather than being sledgehammered up by our Britics friends?
|
The value differentiation can go both ways for premium condition guns: military collectors want the stamped up guns, and general collectors prefer un-stamped guns.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 12-14-2020 at 05:58 PM.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-14-2020, 08:36 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,567
Likes: 90,092
Liked 24,985 Times in 8,557 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
Just from memory, I think the 1940 Shooter's Bible (I have a reprint) showed that Colt continued to chamber their New Service in .455 at least until 1940 and ammunition was still manufactured by the major companies. I believe S&W did the same.
I assume this was mainly for export to Canada and perhaps South Africa, Australia, NZ, etc., but I don't know. Maybe there was a niche market in the US.
|
I vaguely recall a forum conversation about .455 revolvers being somewhat common in the Northeast states near the Canadian border.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
12-29-2020, 02:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,322
Likes: 34,050
Liked 10,995 Times in 3,962 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
Just from memory, I think the 1940 Shooter's Bible (I have a reprint) showed that Colt continued to chamber their New Service in .455 at least until 1940 and ammunition was still manufactured by the major companies. I believe S&W did the same.
I assume this was mainly for export to Canada and perhaps South Africa, Australia, NZ, etc., but I don't know. Maybe there was a niche market in the US.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muley Gil
I vaguely recall a forum conversation about .455 revolvers being somewhat common in the Northeast states near the Canadian border.
|
In case someone is still interested ...
I finally just opened the 1940 SB and confirmed Colt and S&W did indeed offer revolvers chambered in .455. Colt called it ".455 Eley" while S&W referenced it as both ".455 Colt and .455 Eley."
For Colt, it was the New Service, for S&W it was the 1926 Model .44 Target. In its blurb about the NS, Colt proudly proclaims "This is the standard arm of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police." Although they didn't say it, I think Colt provided this revolver to the RCMP chambered for both the .45 Colt and the .455 Eley.
Later on in the book, under the heading "Average Ballistics of Remington Oil Proof Pistol and Revolver Cartridges" is listed ".455 Webley Mark II" with a 265 lead bullet, muzzle velocity 600 (fps) from a 6" barrel. From this I infer that Remington at least was still producing .455 ammunition as late as 1940.
Whew! I hope someone wanted to read this!
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-29-2020, 02:51 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
....
For Colt, it was the New Service, for S&W it was the 1926 Model .44 Target. In its blurb about the NS, Colt proudly proclaims "This is the standard arm of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police." Although they didn't say it, I think Colt provided this revolver to the RCMP chambered for both the .45 Colt and the .455 Eley.
|
The RCMP emerged in 1919/20 when the North West Mounted Police was merged with the Dominion Police. From 1904 to 1919 the NWMP had issued the New Service in .455, but switched to .45 Colt in 1919 just prior to the merger. The Dominion Police (the Canadian federal police since 1868) was already using the NS in .45, so that became the standard RCMP issue caliber.
The Canadian military used the New Service from 1900 to 1928, but also in .45 Colt.
They did adopt the S&W 2nd Model and Webley Mk VI in .455 during WW I. The S&W’s reportedly remained in active inventory until after WW II, surviving past the adoption of the .38 M&P in 1939 and then the Inglis Hi-Power as standard sidearm in 1944.
I don‘t know to whom Colt were selling .455 revolvers post-WW I, especially as late as 1940, but it wasn‘t the Canadian government
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-29-2020, 09:08 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,567
Likes: 90,092
Liked 24,985 Times in 8,557 Posts
|
|
"I finally just opened the 1940 SB and confirmed Colt and S&W did indeed offer revolvers chambered in .455. Colt called it ".455 Eley" while S&W referenced it as both '.455 Colt and .455 Eley.'"
Now the question is, has a 2nd Model .455 been lettered to the late '30s-1940? S&W listed the 2nd Model .44 Hand Ejector as being available in 4", yet no 2nd Models have lettered as shipping with a 4" barrel
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-29-2020, 10:49 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,256
Likes: 11,946
Liked 20,610 Times in 8,587 Posts
|
|
1920 thru 1942 45 Colt NS revolvers were re-ordered by RCMP exclusively except for 1932 when the last batch of 455 Eleys (MK II) was ordered. To solve the issue of two different cartridges, all 45 Colt chambered guns were moved to eastern Canada and all 455 Eleys to west of Thunder Bay in Northwest Ontario.
1954 all .45 caliber revolvers were retired since the S&W .38 Spl Military and Police had been adopted in 1939 (thought to be 5 ½” barrels).
1964 retired .45 caliber revolvers were first offered to Force members for $12 ea. Then the remainder were sold to the general public.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 12-29-2020 at 10:56 PM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-30-2020, 08:38 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,322
Likes: 34,050
Liked 10,995 Times in 3,962 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44
1920 thru 1942 45 Colt NS revolvers were re-ordered by RCMP exclusively except for 1932 when the last batch of 455 Eleys (MK II) was ordered. ...
|
I thought it would be odd for Colt to proudly mention arming the RCMP if those sales were in the distant past. Thanks for providing that information.
Just out of curiosity, would it be a huge undertaking to go back to the pre-1940s records and see how many (if any) "1926 Model .44 Target" revolvers chambered for .455 Eley / Colt were manufactured and shipped by S&W? I assume it would be a daunting task, perhaps for more or less nothing, so there may be very little interest amongst those with the ability to do the research.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
12-30-2020, 10:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 1
Liked 169 Times in 23 Posts
|
|
I also have a revolver like that, but it has English civilian fire. Ser. No. is 2193X
And smaller stamps than the one shown.
He has hit numbers on the back of the handle, does anyone know what they could mean?
Best Regards
Christian
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-30-2020, 11:42 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,231
Likes: 34,966
Liked 10,799 Times in 3,681 Posts
|
|
Christian,
I believe the numbers stamped on the backstrap are British regiment markings. Someone more knowledgeable may confirm or correct my opinion. Also, they may be able to tell you what regiment.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-30-2020, 12:23 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
I think Guy is right, although I can’t interpret the exact meaning either.
These markings appear somewhat haphazardly applied. But from observing others, usually the issue month/year was at the top, and that’s likely what the 1/15 or 1/16 (I can’t make sense of the last digit) is. January of 1915/16. 3 would be the gun number and 13 YK the unit (something with Yeoman?). Just my flight of fancy
So that’s all completely speculative. Peter or Alan could likely shed more light.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-30-2020, 12:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 1
Liked 169 Times in 23 Posts
|
|
Yes above 3 / 16 middle 3 and below 13 / YK
It would be great if someone knew
|
12-30-2020, 01:39 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,567
Likes: 90,092
Liked 24,985 Times in 8,557 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolf
Yes above 3 / 16 middle 3 and below 13 / YK
It would be great if someone knew
|
This forum can help with the stampings:
British Militaria Forums - Victorian-era British arms, accoutrements, and military history.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-30-2020, 03:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 171
Likes: 3
Liked 227 Times in 96 Posts
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-31-2020, 09:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 1
Liked 169 Times in 23 Posts
|
|
YK for "Yorkshire Regiment" ?
Christian
|
12-31-2020, 10:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 171
Likes: 3
Liked 227 Times in 96 Posts
|
|
yes.
[dummy text to pad the reply]
|
01-07-2021, 02:24 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 205
Likes: 229
Liked 199 Times in 89 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
Just from memory, I think the 1940 Shooter's Bible (I have a reprint) showed that Colt continued to chamber their New Service in .455 at least until 1940 and ammunition was still manufactured by the major companies. I believe S&W did the same.
I assume this was mainly for export to Canada and perhaps South Africa, Australia, NZ, etc., but I don't know. Maybe there was a niche market in the US.
|
I don't think Colt had any .455 NS revolvers in the warehouse in mid 1940, or else the British Purchasing Commission would have grabbed them along with the .45, .357 and .38 Special New Services that they bought "off the shelf". I know none are listed in the Colt shipping ledgers as being purchased by the BPC from 1940 to 1944, as I have gone through these shipping ledgers myself.
Regards
AlanD
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-07-2021, 09:04 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,322
Likes: 34,050
Liked 10,995 Times in 3,962 Posts
|
|
Good information, Alan. Thank you.
I worded my post badly. I did not mean to imply that I thought Colt was supplying the NS in .455 to anyone in 1940, or that they had any on hand. I certainly don't know that. I should have said something like "it was available" in that caliber, meaning revolvers could be ordered so chambered, according to the Shooter's Bible.
Just in general, it seems the Canadians were quite satisfied with Colt's New Service. One last quote from Revolvers of the British Services that I hope some here will find interesting:
"Canada had purchased 940 Colt "New Service" revolvers in nominal calibre .455 Eley for its troops going to the Anglo-Boer War in 1900. Canada purchased more such revolvers for its Royal North-West Mounted Police in 1904. Further purchases of this model revolver occurred both before and after the R.N.W.M.P. became the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in 1920, and a number of such arms were delivered in calibre .45 Colt."
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
Last edited by Jack Flash; 01-07-2021 at 09:05 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|