K22 Outdoorsman with a unique front sight

HeloMt

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
427
Reaction score
905
Location
Capital of Montana
Several months ago I happened on this prewar K22, condition is excellent and I always enjoy a humpback hammer. What is unusual is the front sight, which has removable ivory panels on both sides. When I first saw it I thought it was very strange until I looked through the sights and saw how easy it was to get a consistent sight picture. It works very well. Obviously, this was someone's target gun back in the day. The grip adapter is kind of fun, too. Anyway, I thought you might enjoy seeing the sight. Randy
 

Attachments

  • 16414105960922886355153216188014.jpg
    16414105960922886355153216188014.jpg
    134.3 KB · Views: 462
  • 16414107480785642082784484037743.jpg
    16414107480785642082784484037743.jpg
    90.1 KB · Views: 435
  • 1641410823897903718679050148086.jpg
    1641410823897903718679050148086.jpg
    101 KB · Views: 358
  • 16414108755596669059067729711779.jpg
    16414108755596669059067729711779.jpg
    57.7 KB · Views: 340
Register to hide this ad
Here ya go.
8-E131-CAB-F17-D-4-B82-9871-3-B838097-A357.jpg
 
I wish I was squared away enough to remember the name of that sight attachment. It was one of Walter Roper's favorites----a white outline front sight allowing you to shoot at point of aim, rather than using the six o'clock hold so many find so irksome.

I stumbled upon what I came to call a Roper Custom---a Colt Officers Model .38 with Roper's grips, rear sight, action job, and some cosmetics which guaranteed no turn line----ever------and this front sight attachment. I'd decided it was Roper's second front sight design-------right up until I found out Roper didn't have a second front sight design. He got it right the first time.

The late Joe Miller came to my rescue on the sight attachment. He not only knew the name, but he had them on several of his S&W's, and had used them in competition.

My favorite story on that Roper Custom came when I'd taken it to my gunsmith for show and tell. He's sitting there on his 3-legged stool, wearing his leather apron, and puffing on his pipe. He'd oohed and awed about all the right stuff, and then he said, "You know, I hate these f------ Colts, but whoever did that action job REALLY knew what they were doing.!!"

And YES, THANK YOU----There Is A God------WhiteX is the name!!

Ralph Tremaine
 
Last edited:
Forgot to mention that’s a nice gun ! Very interesting Humpback also.

Oh it's a VERY NICE GUN!!!!-----Where do you start counting? WhiteX?----Pre-War S&W Grip Adapter?----- Humpback Hammer?------Drop dead gorgeous condition?

I have to go----I think I wet my pants!!

Ralph Tremaine

I don't want to give anybody the wrong impression----all these goodies are no big deal--I've had all of them----------just not all at the same time on the same gun----that's just plain not fair!! God loves you for sure and certain!!
 
Last edited:
What a great find - someone did a fine job tricking out that already excellent revolver!
 
There's a Registered Magnum on a popular auction site that has a Whitex sight. Now I've seen two. If I had ten grand, I'd buy it. That K-22 is a beauty. It certainly checks all the boxes.
 
And if any of you folks want to know if these bells and whistles pay for themselves down the road, here are two K-22 1st's of mine that sold on Gun Broker Auction within the last two years. The condition of each was essentially identical----except one had a King Cockeyed Hammer-----the only difference.

#659XXX shipped January 28, 1937------------------------$1750.

#646XXX shipped March 28, 1934-------------------------$2500.

Ralph Tremaine

As an aside, a King Cockeyed Hammer is the stock S&W Hammer which has had its spur ground off, an offset spur (offset either left, right, or both) welded in it's place, the King Cockeyed Hammer logo stamped on the side, and the altered hammer re-case hardened. The cost: $5.00.
 
Last edited:
And if any of you folks want to know if these bells and whistles pay for themselves down the road, here are two K-22 1st's of mine that sold on Gun Broker Auction within the last two years. The condition of each was essentially identical----except one had a King Cockeyed Hammer-----the only difference.

#659XXX shipped January 28, 1937------------------------$1750.

#646XXX shipped March 28, 1934-------------------------$2500.

Ralph Tremaine

As an aside, a King Cockeyed Hammer is the stock S&W Hammer which has had its spur ground off, an offset spur (offset either left, right, or both) welded in it's place, the King Cockeyed Hammer logo stamped on the side, and the altered hammer re-case hardened. The cost: $5.00.

King options on a high condition gun get me pretty excited! lol

I also like having the correspondence the original owner had with the factory when ordering the gun.

v1N0dr6.jpg
 
HeloMt
Are you sure that is an Outdoorsman and not a prewar K-22 Masterpiece (1 of 1067)?
Your photos of the hammer show what appears to be the short action hammer with the frame stop notch on it.
 
I wish I was squared away enough to remember the name of that sight attachment. It was one of Walter Roper's favorites----a white outline front sight allowing you to shoot at point of aim, rather than using the six o'clock hold so many find so irksome.

I stumbled upon what I came to call a Roper Custom---a Colt Officers Model .38 with Roper's grips, rear sight, action job, and some cosmetics which guaranteed no turn line----ever------and this front sight attachment. I'd decided it was Roper's second front sight design-------right up until I found out Roper didn't have a second front sight design. He got it right the first time.

The late Joe Miller came to my rescue on the sight attachment. He not only knew the name, but he had them on several of his S&W's, and had used them in competition.

My favorite story on that Roper Custom came when I'd taken it to my gunsmith for show and tell. He's sitting there on his 3-legged stool, wearing his leather apron, and puffing on his pipe. He'd oohed and awed about all the right stuff, and then he said, "You know, I hate these f------ Colts, but whoever did that action job REALLY knew what they were doing.!!"

And YES, THANK YOU----There Is A God------WhiteX is the name!!

Ralph Tremaine

No turn line ever?! Can you elaborate on this please? A timing change of some sort, or some kind of clearcoat over the bluing???
 
Beautiful find on that K-22. I have never seen one of those front sites in the flesh, very interesting. The original K frame grips adapters are hard to come by. Very nice acquisition.
 
No turn line ever?! Can you elaborate on this please? A timing change of some sort, or some kind of clearcoat over the bluing???

Yes, I can elaborate-------at least as to the what (On both Colt and S&W), if not as to the how.

Colt: I first thought it was a timing change---now I'm not so sure. I'm not so sure out of pure ignorance. (I had unlimited access to the Roper Colt for several years----access to a stock Officers Model for only a short time (minutes).) Roper Colt: The cylinder stop SNAPPED down (loud and hard) at the first movement of hammer/trigger----all the way down----wouldn't go down any further; and SNAPPED back up when the cylinder stop was about a third of the way into the lead to the cylinder stop notch. The apparent "secret" with the Roper Colt is the bluing had been removed from the lead into each cylinder stop notch----made for a very striking cosmetic change----and if it hadn't been removed, then the turn line in/through the blue would have been maybe 1/8" long in each lead area---at the end of the lead area right next to the notch. So that's the what on the Roper gun.

On what appeared to be a stock as a stove, quasi-beater, shooter grade Officers Model of similar vintage (The Roper gun shipped from Colt October 22, 1935.), the cylinder stop dropped (Did not SNAP) at essentially the same time vis-a-vis the hammer/trigger movement, but did not appear to have moved/dropped as far down as the Roper version did, and at least appeared to be dragging against the cylinder----until it went back up. (And it went back up, heading for the notch, at the same time as with the Roper version.) So much for Colt stuff.

Same church, different pew with a S&W 4th Model K-22 (Post-war, wide rib): This is my first brand new in the box S&W (or anything else for that matter). The time is late 1950's. This gun is finished in the "Satin Blue"----the funky finish. It was then, as it is now, atrocious---just plain nasty. I could have the "Bright Blue" on special order after a 6 month wait. Forget about it!!! Come the Spring of 1960 I've had about all I can stand of the funky finish, and ship the gun back to Springfield for Bright Blue. Remember that special order, 6 month wait for Bright Blue at the beginning? I had this gun back in 2-3 weeks----letter perfect!! Now, there were some special instructions which accompanied this gun back to Springfield----went like this: Please assign this gun to your very best craftsman. Have him go through it, and make it as perfect as can be. I don't care how long it takes nor how much it costs.

Okay, the gun is back---it's beautiful, everything works, I have no idea what, if anything special they did to it because they didn't say and I didn't ask. (So what do you expect from a dumb kid?!!) Time passes, things change. About a half a box-car full of ammo has gone through this gun by now, and I've learned about things like turn-rings. This gun has no turn-ring. Actually, on closer examination, it does. It's about 3/32" long at the lead into each cylinder stop----very faint. I told Jinks about all this, and he about has a conniption fit!! He's actually angry!! "THEY NEVER SHOULD HAVE DONE THAT!!! IT'LL SKIP CHAMBERS IN RAPID DOUBLE ACTION FIRE!!" I didn't have the heart to tell him about half of that half a box-car full of ammo had been in as rapid a double action fire as I could manage while I was trying to emulate McGivern's feats-----and it never missed a beat!!

So, here they most certainly altered the timing----a bunch. I can hypothesise, as to the how, but so can anybody else. The real accurate, honest answers come from folks who know for sure and certain, and are inclined to share such information------for whatever reason. I suspect those of our members who identify themselves as S&W Factory Armorers (or some such) know how this is done. I suspect also they (some or all) would be happy to share such information with those who are happy to share their cost of acquiring such information. These people are known as Consultants.

Otherwise you're into a situation similar to mine with my gunsmith. I collected target guns---from the very beginning to what I deemed to be the end. The majority of my collection consisted of pre-war hand ejectors----and I had all of them. I soon learned the tiny little screw securing the rear sight to the frame was not the least bit inclined to come loose, so off to the good Doctor Howard I go. The screw is removed inside of 10 minutes----with no damage to anything----------ever----$20. At a point in time when I was so foolish as to ask, "How'd you do that?!!!"; I was told, "It's amazing what a little heat will do!" I was never so foolish as to ask about how much heat, where, and for how long. I was fortunate enough to remember a lesson from long ago----lest I suffer the embarrassment of learning it again.

I'm maybe 15. I have an absolutely exquisite French made, double barrel, muzzle loading shotgun. I manage to lose one of the hammer screws. The screw is engraved on the head, and the screw slot forms a part of the engraving pattern on the lock when it's tightened. Off I go to my gunsmith, who says he can make a new screw. He does just that---engraving and all, and you can't tell which is the old screw. "How much?" I scream like a ruptured mud hen when he says "$15.00". "What the hell for?!!" He very calmly explained half was for his time, and the other half was for knowing what to do. That was the last time I ever questioned/challenged a professional about their fee.

At any rate, that's it----any help?

Ralph Tremaine
 
Kennethg, honestly I hadn't caught that. In comparing it to my other K22 Outdoorsman it does have the short action. It is obvious in the attached photos. Roy said it was produced in 11/37 which makes it too early for the K22 Masterpiece as the book says that production run was 1940-41. The other strange thing is the S&W logo being full size on the side plate as the Masterpiece run is supposed to have. The only thing lacking is the micrometer rear sight. Now I'm confused. The book also says the Humpback hammer was introduced on the K22 outdoorsman in 1937, so that checks. But there is no mention of a short action being available until 1940, I think. I pulled the grips to check for any factory rework stamps and there are none. Perhaps a special order...I'm not sure. Maybe a letter will shed some light. I'm going to be spending a small fortune on letters following the moratorium! Any insights you all might have on a short action Humpback hammer and a S&W logo on the side plate appearing on a 1937 K22 outdoorsman would be appreciated. Thanks for the sharp eyes, Ken. I wouldn't have caught that!
 

Attachments

  • 16415022170023331981951683228380.jpg
    16415022170023331981951683228380.jpg
    179.1 KB · Views: 67
  • 16415022996447225089097035967986.jpg
    16415022996447225089097035967986.jpg
    170.2 KB · Views: 55
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top