|
|
04-08-2009, 05:30 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 513
Likes: 138
Liked 525 Times in 160 Posts
|
|
Does anyone have any ballistic info on these old rounds. Any info on year of manufacture. These were the green box with the black legged tray.
They are the 158 Lead bullets with "Kleanbore" priming. The reason i ask is I got a box from the local gun shop, they were tucked away on one of his racks. I was purchasing a beautiful Model 10 Snub and needed some ammo, this was all he had in 38.
Any way I shot some of it when I got home, they had very good accuracy and having never shot a 38 before did not really know what toexpect as far as recoil muzzle flash etc...
Then I reloaded some 38's with 158 grain Speer SJHP and 11.5 grains of IMR 4227, well the difference in recoil between the reloads and that Remington ammo was quite noticeable. I am wondering what the FPS was for these rounds, i suspect they would be considered +P+++ in this day an age.
Thanks for the info,
Ric
|
04-08-2009, 05:30 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 513
Likes: 138
Liked 525 Times in 160 Posts
|
|
Does anyone have any ballistic info on these old rounds. Any info on year of manufacture. These were the green box with the black legged tray.
They are the 158 Lead bullets with "Kleanbore" priming. The reason i ask is I got a box from the local gun shop, they were tucked away on one of his racks. I was purchasing a beautiful Model 10 Snub and needed some ammo, this was all he had in 38.
Any way I shot some of it when I got home, they had very good accuracy and having never shot a 38 before did not really know what toexpect as far as recoil muzzle flash etc...
Then I reloaded some 38's with 158 grain Speer SJHP and 11.5 grains of IMR 4227, well the difference in recoil between the reloads and that Remington ammo was quite noticeable. I am wondering what the FPS was for these rounds, i suspect they would be considered +P+++ in this day an age.
Thanks for the info,
Ric
|
04-08-2009, 05:45 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 631
Liked 109 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
I don't know anything specific about the loads in question, but I do know that some of the old spec .38 specials (IE: the .38/44 loads) are quite hot. Equivilent to some .357 magnum loads even.
__________________
Formerly know as Lucky Derby
|
04-08-2009, 06:44 AM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
What does the box say other than, "Kleanbore"?
Does it mention High Velocity or .38/44?
If so, those loads won't blow up your gun, but will accelerate wear, considerably. They are meant for guns built on .44 and .45 frames.
Examples include the S&W Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman and the Colt New Service.
T-Star
|
04-08-2009, 06:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 513
Likes: 138
Liked 525 Times in 160 Posts
|
|
No 38/44 states specifically 38 Special Police Service
|
04-08-2009, 06:56 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 726
Liked 1,118 Times in 305 Posts
|
|
If it has the index code of 5138, it should be a standard velocity load (700-800 fps).
Ed
|
04-08-2009, 07:23 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 513
Likes: 138
Liked 525 Times in 160 Posts
|
|
That is the correct code. So what would account for the increased recoil and muzzle blast. Are the new recommended loads so lawyer reduced that I have some room to go on this work up?
|
04-08-2009, 08:12 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 726
Liked 1,118 Times in 305 Posts
|
|
Are you saying that the old ammo had more recoil, muzzle flash?
My 1967 Lyman manual has a max recommended charge under a 158 gr. cast (no round nose lead listed) of 9.5 of IMR4227.
Ed
|
04-08-2009, 09:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 513
Likes: 138
Liked 525 Times in 160 Posts
|
|
Yep those old rounds, which were factory compared to the ones i reloaded kicked pretty good. And muzzle flash was clearly visible, these shells showed no signs of pressure issues either.
|
04-08-2009, 12:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 792
Liked 679 Times in 437 Posts
|
|
Maybe you bought somebodies re-loads ie ammo that they reloaded many years ago and put in an old box.
Troy
|
04-08-2009, 08:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Back home, for now
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 2,997
Liked 3,661 Times in 617 Posts
|
|
That used to be the LAPD service load, way back when. Velocity is, I believe, somewhere just north of 900 fps. Not really hot, but warmer than the standard RNL stuff. Coupled with a 6" K38 in a spit-shined clamshell, it was the classic west-coast revolver set-up.
Bob
|
04-15-2009, 06:00 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 726
Liked 1,118 Times in 305 Posts
|
|
I just found a brochure from the 50s for that ammo and it lists code 5138 as having a velocity of 870 fps with energy of 266, out of a 6" barrel. OIF2 was closest to the hole with his recollection.
Ed
|
04-15-2009, 07:50 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 89,911
Liked 24,950 Times in 8,540 Posts
|
|
Check the primers. If they are slightly rounded, they are probably factory. Remington and Winchester both sold bullets for reloading, so they aren't a good indicator of factory loads.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|