Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2023, 09:27 AM
cmansguns's Avatar
cmansguns cmansguns is offline
US Veteran
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Hanover, Virginia
Posts: 1,925
Likes: 3,272
Liked 5,714 Times in 1,411 Posts
Default S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety

A couple weeks ago I saw a thread on the reloading section of this Forum. Perusing through the thread I saw several comments about reloading for this impossible to find factory new round.

What really caught my though was several comments from a lot of well known, long time members about using modern S&W 32 Long ammo and shooting it out of these type handguns. There did not seem to be any comments that this practice would be unsafe but since I have a 1905 HE chambered for 32-20 WCF and I have a decent quantity of S&W 32 Long factory ammo for my Model 31 on hand I thought maybe more of you folks would weigh in on this subject.

The gun: Model 1905 4th change, 32-20 WCF, s/n 105093, Roy verified it shipped in October 1921. All #'s match, bore and chambers very good, 5", mechanically good, no issues. According to sources, cylinder heat treating started on these Models at s/n 81287 so mine should be heat treated.

The ammo: Magtech, S&W 32 Long, 98 gr. LRN (Lead Round Nose).

Question for readers: Have you shot this modern ammo in an older 32-20 WCF chambered gun?

Is it really safe? My ammo is 98 gr and the cowboy action ammo I have been trying to find is listed as 115 gr. Lead Flat Nose. I don't know the real velocities of either. I know one is not supposed to shoot "rifle loads" through these old guns.

I would welcome any thoughts on this matter because I sure don't want to try something inherently unsafe for me or the gun but I would also like to put a few cylinders through this old guy if safe.

Moderators: If this post really belongs to "ammo" or "reloading" please feel free to move it. I thought the revolver forum would maybe gain more replies, good or bad.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 32-20 HE a.jpg (91.0 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg 32-20 HE b.jpg (97.0 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg 32-20 HE d.jpg (60.0 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg 32-20 HE h.jpg (55.9 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg 32-20 HE i.jpg (73.9 KB, 27 views)
__________________
Charlie B
SWCA#3083, SWHF#570
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 05-15-2023, 09:59 AM
Brooks's Avatar
Brooks Brooks is offline
Member
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 94
Likes: 101
Liked 184 Times in 66 Posts
Default

Ya, I saw those posts about shooting 32 long in a 32-20 gun. Personally, I have not done it, and I would not do it..... but hey... that's just me...right?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 05-15-2023, 10:12 AM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is online now
US Veteran

S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,376 Times in 5,479 Posts
Default

Years ago, I grabbed my 32 Winchester S&W and a box of ammo and went to the range. Chambered and fired six shots and was not impressed by the results. Opened the cylinder and pushed out the brass to see that every one of the rounds fired resulted in cases split from base to mouth. Looked at the box to find I had grabbed a box of 32 Long. Never did that again, but it was not a dangerous act, just ruined 6 cases vowing never to repeat my mistake.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 05-15-2023, 11:05 AM
Muley Gil Muley Gil is offline
US Veteran
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,548
Likes: 89,907
Liked 24,947 Times in 8,539 Posts
Default

As I have posted several times, I worked two different murders where the killers used .32-20 S&Ws loaded with .32 Long ammo. It works, but I have several .32 Long revolvers & I don't want to waste or ruin the brass.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 05-15-2023, 03:30 PM
Drm50 Drm50 is offline
Member
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Monroe cnty. Ohio
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4,432
Liked 10,074 Times in 3,693 Posts
Default

It will fire and split & bulge the cases. No point in doing it unless dire emergency. It has been suggested you can fire 32 in the 1892 French 8mm
military revolvers. It is true it will fire but with same results of brass and even less results on paper.
It is good policy to fire the cartridge intended for the firearm.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 05-16-2023, 09:12 AM
Hawg Rider Hawg Rider is offline
Member
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 4,785
Liked 4,297 Times in 1,202 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooks View Post
Ya, I saw those posts about shooting 32 long in a 32-20 gun. Personally, I have not done it, and I would not do it..... but hey... that's just me...right?
Agreed...I only shoot .32-20 cartridges in my .32-20 M&P (Model of 1905 4th Change), and it's usually Cowboy Action ammo (Black Hills, HSM, etc.). I do not reload, and it's about the only ammo I can find (occasionally!). I routinely Google .32-20 ammo to see who might have some in stock. CAS ammo is very safe and fun to ammo, when you can find it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 05-16-2023, 12:24 PM
Model19man Model19man is offline
SWCA Member
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 666
Liked 1,575 Times in 668 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmansguns View Post
The gun: Model 1905 4th change, 32-20 WCF, s/n 105093, Roy verified it shipped in October 1921. All #'s match, bore and chambers very good, 5", mechanically good, no issues. According to sources, cylinder heat treating started on these Models at s/n 81287 so mine should be heat treated.
32 WCF is the stamping on the barrel. That's what is used in those. Hard to find and expensive when you do. AKA 32-20. Any other ammunition is the wrong stuff.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 32-20 HE h.jpg (36.5 KB, 18 views)
__________________
S&WHF #946
S&WCA #3824

Last edited by Model19man; 05-16-2023 at 12:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 05-16-2023, 08:47 PM
adowns adowns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 142
Likes: 120
Liked 67 Times in 36 Posts
Default

I think the 32-20's are much less of a concern with modern ammunition than the same model revolvers chambered in 38 Special because the cylinder walls are so much thicker in 32-20 revolvers.

And despite the ever present warnings about 32-20 rifle ammunition, I have never seen a picture of a revolver blown up by its use. But I'm no expert and the real experts may have some examples.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 05-17-2023, 09:05 AM
TIMETRIPPER TIMETRIPPER is offline
Member
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 1,526
Liked 1,826 Times in 737 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe View Post
Years ago, I grabbed my 32 Winchester S&W and a box of ammo and went to the range. Chambered and fired six shots and was not impressed by the results. Opened the cylinder and pushed out the brass to see that every one of the rounds fired resulted in cases split from base to mouth. Looked at the box to find I had grabbed a box of 32 Long. Never did that again, but it was not a dangerous act, just ruined 6 cases vowing never to repeat my mistake.
Almost did the same thing myself, but noticed how loose the rounds were in the cylinders before going any further.
It would be a fools folly to do it intentionally.

John
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-17-2023, 09:17 AM
cmansguns's Avatar
cmansguns cmansguns is offline
US Veteran
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Hanover, Virginia
Posts: 1,925
Likes: 3,272
Liked 5,714 Times in 1,411 Posts
Default Agreed.....I won't be shooting 32 Long in my 32-20 revolver

Agreed with all replies. No sense taking any chances. I'll keep on looking for some 32-20 Cowboy Action ammo. I did see 1 place on line but only payment they would accept was electronic and reviews were all negative that indicated a total scam.

Reliable sources on line all out-of-stock, no backorder, but I'll keep watch.

Thanks everyone for the replies.
__________________
Charlie B
SWCA#3083, SWHF#570
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-18-2023, 01:35 PM
TIMETRIPPER TIMETRIPPER is offline
Member
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 1,526
Liked 1,826 Times in 737 Posts
Default

I have seen 32-20 more more often at gun shows than online or at the shops. More so with empty brass than complete ammo.

John
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-21-2023, 12:23 PM
4K2022 4K2022 is offline
Member
S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety S&W 1905 4th Change 32-20 WCF -- modern ammo question on safety  
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Florida Swamp
Posts: 226
Likes: 1,270
Liked 329 Times in 144 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model19man View Post
32 WCF is the stamping on the barrel. That's what is used in those. Hard to find and expensive when you do. AKA 32-20. Any other ammunition is the wrong stuff.
LEFT to right; 38 S&W, 38 special, empty 32-20 brass 32 S&W long, 32 S&W, 32-20 soft point and 32-20 lead

Sorry for omitting the 357 magnum,, (case length)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1636.jpg (46.0 KB, 13 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1905 4th Change Ammo James K S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 4 12-19-2021 09:51 PM
1905 4th Change Question Milton S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 18 07-10-2016 11:20 PM
1916 model 1905 4th change ammo choices model 13 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 11 11-01-2013 04:17 AM
Antique Revolver-Modern Ammo Question. WaistGunner S&W Antiques 11 10-07-2008 08:26 PM
1905 3rd change question b swanson S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 07-15-2008 08:17 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)