Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2024, 06:57 PM
OutAtTheEdge's Avatar
OutAtTheEdge OutAtTheEdge is offline
Member
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Midwest
Posts: 242
Likes: 1,122
Liked 693 Times in 154 Posts
Default How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?

Okay folks, I'd really appreciate some input on this one. I picked this up in '06 and just got around to getting it lettered. This is a .38 Military & Police Model of 1905 Fourth Change, nickel finish with standard service sights on a 5" barrel, with a square butt frame and checked walnut stocks.

Looking at the SCSW 3rd Edition (don't own the 4th, now waiting to get the 5th) description of this model, I note first that the square butt is "scarce". Then, further down, the authors state that "Target models have been observed without any frame markings whatsoever (including the S&W trademark normally on the sideplate) except for serial numbers. Otherwise will be marked "Made in U.S.A." on the frame's right side." This gun is likewise devoid of the logo and made-in-USA frame markings, but is is clearly a service model, not target.

I've done some looking in books and online over the years, but I've never seen another without the frame markings, service OR target. I obviously haven't seen them all, or as many as lots of you have, but I have looked.

Then of course, there is the condition of the gun, which may not be absolutely perfect, but is still, IMHO, breathtaking.

Oh, and one other thing I found personally interesting. This is only the third Smith I've had lettered, and the second one that turns out to have been shipped to Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett and Company in Chicago. Small world, huh?

So, I'd like to hear any input you guys may have to offer. Anyone have or had one like it? Any new info on the unusual lack of frame markings? Anything else?

IMG_5076.jpg

IMG_5075.jpg

IMG_5084.jpg

IMG_5083.jpg

IMG_5242.jpg
__________________
Ain't This Fun Though?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-06-2024, 07:16 PM
OutAtTheEdge's Avatar
OutAtTheEdge OutAtTheEdge is offline
Member
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Midwest
Posts: 242
Likes: 1,122
Liked 693 Times in 154 Posts
Default A Few More Pics

IMG_5086.jpg

IMG_5081.jpg

IMG_5074.jpg

IMG_5079.jpg

IMG_5077.jpg
__________________
Ain't This Fun Though?
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 03-06-2024, 07:59 PM
Lee Barner's Avatar
Lee Barner Lee Barner is offline
US Veteran
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 25,688
Liked 15,934 Times in 2,182 Posts
Default

that is a beautiful example of an M&P from the teens. the grip medallions will clean up nice with a pencil eraser. thanks for sharing. Lee
__________________
VFW, NRA, VVA, S&WCA 1758
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 03-06-2024, 08:08 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,507
Likes: 5,124
Liked 19,083 Times in 6,885 Posts
Default

Well, first of all, the SCSW is mistaken on the point you quoted. The round butt became more scarce in the 1920s, not the square butt. The fixed sight, square butt, 5" barrel variant was very common. So, to answer your question, it isn't unusual at all.

That said, the style stocks on your revolver were being phased out in 1920, when yours shipped. I'd guess this M&P was probably assembled in 1919, when those were still the only stocks available for that model. It also falls into the range that still lacked the monogram after the company emerged from the government takeover during WWI.

Anyway, it is a nice piece, especially with the intact nickel finish. Blue was more common.

Edit: (Forgot one of your questions.) The Made in U.S.A. mark didn't come into use until the spring of 1922.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318

Last edited by JP@AK; 03-06-2024 at 08:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 03-06-2024, 09:01 PM
OutAtTheEdge's Avatar
OutAtTheEdge OutAtTheEdge is offline
Member
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Midwest
Posts: 242
Likes: 1,122
Liked 693 Times in 154 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK View Post
Well, first of all, the SCSW is mistaken on the point you quoted. The round butt became more scarce in the 1920s, not the square butt. The fixed sight, square butt, 5" barrel variant was very common. So, to answer your question, it isn't unusual at all.

That said, the style stocks on your revolver were being phased out in 1920, when yours shipped. I'd guess this M&P was probably assembled in 1919, when those were still the only stocks available for that model. It also falls into the range that still lacked the monogram after the company emerged from the government takeover during WWI.

Anyway, it is a nice piece, especially with the intact nickel finish. Blue was more common.

Edit: (Forgot one of your questions.) The Made in U.S.A. mark didn't come into use until the spring of 1922.
Thanks Jack! It is pretty, isn't it?
__________________
Ain't This Fun Though?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 03-06-2024, 09:50 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,026
Likes: 9,007
Liked 48,775 Times in 9,263 Posts
Default

Those medallions are made of brass with a gold wash on them. I do not recommend a pencil eraser to clean them. Lay them flat on a table and put a drop of oil on them to soften the gunk. Let it sit a day or two. gently rub with an oily Q-tip. If gunk remains, try acetone gently on a q-tip. Fingernail polish remover is acetone usually if you don't have any around.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 03-06-2024, 10:03 PM
OutAtTheEdge's Avatar
OutAtTheEdge OutAtTheEdge is offline
Member
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Midwest
Posts: 242
Likes: 1,122
Liked 693 Times in 154 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector View Post
Those medallions are made of brass with a gold wash on them. I do not recommend a pencil eraser to clean them. Lay them flat on a table and put a drop of oil on them to soften the gunk. Let it sit a day or two. gently rub with an oily Q-tip. If gunk remains, try acetone gently on a q-tip. Fingernail polish remover is acetone usually if you don't have any around.
Thanks Lee!
__________________
Ain't This Fun Though?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2024, 11:34 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,653
Likes: 244
Liked 29,165 Times in 14,102 Posts
Default

I cannot enlarge any of the attached pictures enough to see any details, nor read the letter, but Jack's explanation is likely accurate. Revolvers of the WWI era did not have the S&W logo stamp on the frame. FYI, at that time S&W no longer cataloged your revolver as the Model of 1905, despite what the letter says. It was called simply the .38 Military and Police Model (Square Butt) in S&W literature from around 1915 onward.

Last edited by DWalt; 03-06-2024 at 11:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 03-06-2024, 11:38 PM
OutAtTheEdge's Avatar
OutAtTheEdge OutAtTheEdge is offline
Member
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Midwest
Posts: 242
Likes: 1,122
Liked 693 Times in 154 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt View Post
I cannot enlarge any of the attached pictures enough to see any details,
Not sure if this is an issue with different browsers or platforms or whatever, but try just pausing your cursor over the picture, and it should/could/might open the bigger photo.
__________________
Ain't This Fun Though?
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 03-07-2024, 12:43 PM
4K2022 4K2022 is offline
Member
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Florida Swamp
Posts: 226
Likes: 1,270
Liked 329 Times in 144 Posts
Default

The picture of the star,,,
The reason to buy a Smith & Wesson
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 03-07-2024, 04:30 PM
larryofcc larryofcc is offline
SWCA Member
How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change? How Unusual Is This M&P 1905 4th Change?  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 5
Liked 3,022 Times in 843 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutAtTheEdge View Post
Okay folks, I'd really appreciate some input on this one. I picked this up in '06 and just got around to getting it lettered. This is a .38 Military & Police Model of 1905 Fourth Change, nickel finish with standard service sights on a 5" barrel, with a square butt frame and checked walnut stocks.

Looking at the SCSW 3rd Edition (don't own the 4th, now waiting to get the 5th) description of this model, I note first that the square butt is "scarce". Then, further down, the authors state that "Target models have been observed without any frame markings whatsoever (including the S&W trademark normally on the sideplate) except for serial numbers. Otherwise will be marked "Made in U.S.A." on the frame's right side." This gun is likewise devoid of the logo and made-in-USA frame markings, but is is clearly a service model, not target.

I've done some looking in books and online over the years, but I've never seen another without the frame markings, service OR target. I obviously haven't seen them all, or as many as lots of you have, but I have looked.

Then of course, there is the condition of the gun, which may not be absolutely perfect, but is still, IMHO, breathtaking.

Oh, and one other thing I found personally interesting. This is only the third Smith I've had lettered, and the second one that turns out to have been shipped to Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett and Company in Chicago. Small world, huh?

So, I'd like to hear any input you guys may have to offer. Anyone have or had one like it? Any new info on the unusual lack of frame markings? Anything else?

Attachment 671467

Attachment 671468

Attachment 671469

Attachment 671470

Attachment 671471
I have nearly the identical gun #302321 shipped 6-19. No letter yet. It too is original nickel, 5" or 6" bbl. No frame marks whatsoever. Same stocks. Square butt. Big Larry
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sight change ?? on 1905 4th change revolvers Lee Barner S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 7 11-01-2023 05:42 PM
Unusual S&W Model 1905 4th Change BigBoy99 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 13 02-17-2017 12:10 PM
Unusual S&W 1905 please help. toomanyprojects S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 26 01-25-2013 03:14 PM
1905 4th- Unusual Loss of Blue smith17 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 16 04-10-2008 01:28 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)