Navy Victory Revolver Clarification

The bucket

Active member
Joined
Apr 25, 2022
Messages
31
Reaction score
119
I just picked up a Victory Revolver. I was told that it was shipped to the Navy. I found out today from the Smith & Wesson Historical Foundation that it was shipped to the US Navy in Norfolk VA.

My question is, in the collector world is this considered a Navy Victory? If so what type?

I have read that if it has the Flaming Bomb proof on the butt it was ordered by the Army.

Just looking for clarification on what "type" my Victory is.
 

Attachments

  • Smith-and-Wesson-Victory-38-SPL_102845136_28338_8C9F4AE36AC5AFBF.jpeg
    Smith-and-Wesson-Victory-38-SPL_102845136_28338_8C9F4AE36AC5AFBF.jpeg
    33.6 KB · Views: 119
  • 20241027_165526.jpg
    20241027_165526.jpg
    103.1 KB · Views: 117
  • 20241021_170601.jpg
    20241021_170601.jpg
    77.4 KB · Views: 142
I'm not sure the meaning of your question, "what type" of Victory model it is.

The vast majority of Victories did go to the Navy. The difference is that the earliest units were purchased directly by the Navy under several different contracts or contract extensions. Later the Army took over all military procurement. Yours falls into the latter category. The U.S. Property stamp confirms that, even though in your photo the swivel is obscuring the serial number.

Not being a Victory collector, I'm not sure, but I think those guys, when they refer to a "Navy Victory," they mean one of the Navy contract guns. Those will actually say "Navy" on them, with no U.S. Property stamp.

Charlie is our Victory expert; perhaps he will reply to this thread.
 
I just picked up a Victory Revolver. I was told that it was shipped to the Navy. I found out today from the Smith & Wesson Historical Foundation that it was shipped to the US Navy in Norfolk VA. My question is, in the collector world is this considered a Navy Victory?

Yes. If it letters as shipped to the U.S. Navy, then it is indeed a Navy Victory.

What was the exact shipping date given in your SWHF letter?

Regards,
Charlie Flick
 
Most .38 Special Victories and some pre-Victories went into Navy service during WWII. As stated, the scarcer and most desirable examples will normally have a U. S. NAVY topstrap property stamp, indicating those made early on under a Navy contract, not Army. Yours is not likely to be one of them.
 
Last edited:
Yes. If it letters as shipped to the U.S. Navy, then it is indeed a Navy Victory.

What was the exact shipping date given in your SWHF letter?

Regards,
Charlie Flick

I have not recieved the letter yet. Micheal (from the Smith amd Wesson Foundation) was just nice enough to quickly look up my gun and verify I went to the Navy. When the letter comes in I will post a reply with the date of shipment.
 
Navy Victory

I recently sold my Navy marked Victory. Mine Lettered as shipping to the Navy and per the copy of original invoice you can see it was part of the early Navy Contracts like posted above by others.

I'm not honestly convinced that the "Navy" top strap marking brings a large premium when buying or selling. I believe it is till the condition of the revolver, mechanically and cosmetically. Mine brought $700 shipped and insured (costs $52.50) so netted a tad less than $650. My grips were correct but a different serial number a few hundred higher if I recall so may swapped with other grips by a unit armorer during the War. If your grips (right hand panel) match the butt serial number, I'd say that's worth more in the value.

As my Letter stated, there is no way to determine if the Navy revolvers actually saw combat duty aboard a US Navy ship, but pictures abound of US Navy combat pilots, carrier based, with their Victories in a shoulder holster rig with their Mae West vests so you can certainly surmise duty, even if no provenance.

Once you have your Letter remember to post the details here because there is a very nice, dedicated Victory data base maintained by Forum Member that records details (no names of owners or other personal identifiers) for future posterity and research.
 

Attachments

I really don't know if Navy marked adds value in the marketplace. But I do believe it adds interest, simply because there are fewer of them.

Also, it seems to me that I remember that some of the earlier Navy marked guns have the Navy marking on the frame's left side, before it was moved to the top strap (as shown in cmansguns' photo).

Charlie Flick, can you shed some light on this for us? Also about the red letter units? Not being a Victory collector, I've forgotten what I knew about this. :rolleyes:
 
As my Letter stated, there is no way to determine if the Navy revolvers actually saw combat duty aboard a US Navy ship, but pictures abound of US Navy combat pilots, carrier based, with their Victories in a shoulder holster rig with their Mae West vests so you can certainly surmise duty, even if no provenance.

One of the many MANY project I am working on right now is aimed at addressing this issue.

I've been going through Victory REPAIR and CORRESPONDENCE files within the SWHF archive.

The vast majority relate to DSC guns. For example I have before me a letter from the Detroit Police Department where they list dozens of Victory revolvers by serial number that they wish to have repaired. That gets logged into the database I'm working on so that when someone orders a Deep Dive from SWHF this info will be include with it.

There are significantly fewer letters like that of a military nature but there are enough that it does add to the database. An example would be like a letter I was just reading from a Washington based Coast Guard Facility where they were listing, by serial number, a number of Victory revolvers in their possession that needed work (an issue with burst barrels).

The vast majority of Victory revolvers will never really have any primary source material that indicates where they ultimately went. However, every once in a while Fate will reach out a hand and grant us a boon in the form of a letter or two asking about a repair or spares and that boon gets recorded.

This really illustrates a major issue within the collecting field and that is the loss of identity ('chain of custody' if you prefer) for arms once they leave the manufacturer. You can letter your Victory and SWHF will write back that it went to USN Oakland 10APR45 and the trail ends there. What we need are secondary sources.

In my case those secondary sources are NYPD records so that you get a letter that says your Victory went to the DSC who shipped it to NYPD in 1942. Now you come to me and I letter it as having gone to a specific officer on a specific date; that continues our 'chain of custody'.

Another example would be Colt SAA revolvers. You get a letter from Colt saying it went to Zork Hardware in Texas in 1890 and the trail ends there. Except the local University archive has all the old Zork records including their ledger books that show who they sold that gun to!

Many people on this forum have access to stuff like that and just don't avail themselves of it. You got your twenty in at LAPD and are getting ready to pull the pin? Go to the firearms guys and ask if they have copies of shipping invoices you can scan. Doesn't have to be current. You know how many commands have basement rooms full of boxes of old records they never got rid of? I found NYPD 1921 sales records in a milk crate under a sink in a mens room at HQ!

Check your local University or college archive. Did you know Amherst college in MA has several feet of S&W documents in their archive, many of which contain serial number data?

Mike Helms would part with a (manly appendage we each have two of) if he could find the JW Storrs records for the No. 1's. I did some checking and there is an archive in NYC that has Storrs family and some business records. Could there be something in there that shed lights on No. 1 shipments, including Helms' number 5? Maybe. I have to go down and look.

Lots of major businesss concerns that went out of business, relocated or change hands donated old records to various colleges and business schools. Look around.

Imagine what we'd find if we could find an archive of Abercrombie & Fitch records or Griffin & Howe? Now that they are going out of business, what would old Sears records tell us. Heck, what about Tiffany? They did a surprising amount of gun engraving and plating; wouldn't their records be informative?

Best,
RM Vivas
(up to my neck in research projects)
 
Last edited:
Many people on this forum have access to stuff like that and just don't avail themselves of it. You got your twenty in at LAPD and are getting ready to pull the pin? Go to the firearms guys and ask if they have copies of shipping invoices you can scan. Doesn't have to be current.
Robert
Thank you again for your extensive research. You are one of our most valuable assets in the SWCA. Much appreciated!

Speaking to your point quoted above, I have a story that illustrates it.

When I purchased an ex-Missouri State Highway Patrol .38 Combat Masterpiece 5" unit from the son of the Trooper who carried in on duty, the seller sent along with it the maintenance records from the department armory. Hence, in addition to the S&W Letter of Authenticity from Dr. Jinks, I have a complete record of this gun's history, including the documents produced when it was released from service and purchased by Lt. Price through a local FFL licensee.
 
A story, interesting? maybe.

My Dad joined the Dept in 1938; in 1938/39 he bought a Colt New Service in .357 magnum; shipped it off to King's in Calf. for target sights and an action tune up. It was his duty gun while riding a Indian motorcycle.

In early 1942 he joined the Coast Guard; trained in Mississippi and participated in the Philippine campaign on small boats... discharged in November of 1945 as a Quartermaster second class. Returned to the Dept and bought a 4" .38 M&P in Aug of 1946.

Have a feeling he may have been issued a Victory while in the South Pacific.

Letter his M&P [and my RM] but don't have it handy. IIRC shipped to a local hardware distributor here in the Burgh.
 
Last edited:
I have the property issue book copies of my dad's stuff from the local PD. He served from 1940-1975. My nephew, who joined in 1993 and recently retired, looked it up and copied it.
As RM Vivas said, lots of this stuff is out there waiting to be found.

Issued 1-1-1941
S&W Pistol 465424
Turned in 8/1/1946

Issued 1-29-1947
S&W Pistol (S) 864925
Turned in-no date

Handcuffs
Issued 12-18-1940
Turned in 8/1/1946
 
Nice info, JayCeeNC

According to my database, M&P S864925 likely left the factory in December, 1946.

S864439 shipped in December, 1946.
S864969 shipped on December 31, 1946.

I own S866178, and it shipped in January, 1947.

All of those have 4" barrels. I also show six others in the S864000 serial range with 4" barrels, but do not have confirmed ship dates for them.
 
Very hard to tell in this picture of one of the most famous Marine Aviators, what's in his holster. Looks like a Victory, but this pic is from the Korean Conflict. Recognize him? Big Larry
 

Attachments

  • Ted Williams USMC.jpg
    Ted Williams USMC.jpg
    62.2 KB · Views: 51
I was issued one in July 1969. My second issue was a model 10. That is what got me started with S&W's. It was reported that Army Aviation had a large stash of S&W M&P's stored at Ft. Rucker. I have no proof of that, as I have not seen those guns. A similar stash of M-15/M-10 were located with AF Log. at Warner-Robins AFB. Knowing full well the propensity for anal-retentive tendencies involving military records keeping I'm certain a treasure trove of information exists somewhere.
 
I filled out a Freedom of Information Act request on mine. I did the same thing on my 1911 made in 1918.

It is a long shot that any info will come up, but it is worth a shot.
 
I'll add another primary source record for 'Victories', although this is the type most likely to be found by a person doing geneaology on their family, or digging through dad's or grandad's stuff. A buddy has the reciept from Rariton Arsenal when his dad, an Ensign, purchased one 1946. I consider this long shot source material (single document kept by owner and family), but if I hadn't seen it myself I wouldn't have been confident of the story of a private purchase from the Navy. Side note: the revolver is not stamped US Navy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top