|
|
02-17-2008, 03:04 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-17-2008, 03:04 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-17-2008, 03:34 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,990
Likes: 181
Liked 2,719 Times in 724 Posts
|
|
Bill,
That's a beauty too. I remember seeing it in Gene's shop when it was just a pile of pieces. He really does a beautiful job.
(Of course, by posting this, you are just asking to start a discussion as to whether this is a Target Heavy Duty or perhaps one of the first Outdoorsmen. Let me be the first to suggest that it is simply a subcaliber target version of the Mod. 1926)
Bob
|
02-17-2008, 03:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 356
Likes: 7
Liked 93 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Bill,
Another fine HD! I wish 5" target models were standard production guns back then. Thanks for sharing.
Larry
|
02-17-2008, 04:10 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 244
Likes: 80
Liked 242 Times in 56 Posts
|
|
Bill,
That is a very neat gun!
Michael
__________________
N-Frame-itis THERE IS NO CURE!
|
02-17-2008, 04:25 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Do you suppose this was built on a 1926 Target frame or did S&W convert the fixed sight frame to adjustable sights? Since the 1926 and the HD were identical save the caliber it would have been easy to create a Target HD by simply using the 1926 Target frame.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
02-17-2008, 05:10 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Franklin,
I can only assume that they built it the same way they did the target 44s of the day which was to mill the top strap for the adjustable sight and to cut the front sight, mill the base and add the target site. That's what I think.
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
02-17-2008, 05:18 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NORTHERN OHIO
Posts: 747
Likes: 172
Liked 249 Times in 56 Posts
|
|
Neat gun and story, Bill.
Another rarity!
Don
__________________
OGCA Life
NRA Life
|
02-17-2008, 05:26 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX, USA
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 8
Liked 740 Times in 256 Posts
|
|
Dang! That will take your breath away!
I am very very impressed. That is truly a work of art. I am extremely impressed at how well that captures the look that the HD fans love to see.
Ok, you have convinced me. I need to get one of those built up also by Gene.
Thank you very much for posting the pictures! That is almost more impressive then the 6.5" you posted on.
Very impressive Bill!
__________________
SWCA 1646
|
02-17-2008, 05:27 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
|
|
Bill
So - a couple of questions . One, your note
said a Call gold bead - but what is on the gun
is a McGivern Gold bead. Did you mean McGivern ?
Second - is a police target something different from the
McGivern model ? And is it something different from a 38/44
5" target ?
Gene does nice work.
Regards, Mike Priwer
|
02-17-2008, 06:47 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Mike,
It is not a McGivern Gold bead but is not quite as flush as most Call Gold beads. As you will note, this was shipped in the second month (missed first month by 2 days) of production and 18 months before the first Outdoorsman was shipped. In the History letter, the Historian says " The above revolver was specially ordered as a target model before the Outdoorsman series was officially introduced. These early Outdoorsman were referred to as .38/44 Police Target Models."
Gene does great work!
Hope that helps,
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
02-17-2008, 06:58 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
|
|
Bill
Do you know anything about the history of
that front sight blade ? Did Gene make that
up, or was it that way when you got the gun ?
I will post a question to Roy, asking what
is the difference between a 38/44 police target
model, and a 38/44 McGivern model .
Regards, Mike Priwer
|
02-17-2008, 07:01 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Mike,
Gene made it from a regular patridge front sight. If you have a correct N frame pre war Call Gold bead, I would be glad to take it off your hands!
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
02-17-2008, 07:14 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
|
|
Bill
Gene should be able to make it correctly,
himself. Tell his to make it flush - no
projection whatsoever. Absolutely flush.
Regards, Mike Priwer
|
02-17-2008, 09:03 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
So, they didn't make any specific target frames for 44s? They took regular fixed-sight frames and milled them?
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
02-17-2008, 09:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Upstate
Posts: 465
Likes: 150
Liked 93 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
That is a lovely revolver...thanks for posting the photos.
|
02-18-2008, 08:57 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
|
|
SP
That is true for all pre-WW2 targets. There
was just frames and barrels. All target barrels
are fixed-sight barrels that get further work.
The same was true for frames.
It may have been that, somewhere in the various
machining processes, they took frames destined
for targets, and finished them differently.
But the forgings are all the same.
Sometimes, when you pull off the rear target
sight leaf, you will see the remanent of the
original fixed sight. Typically, this would
have been a gun that was originally fixed
sights, then sent back to the factory to be
converted to target.
Later, Mike Priwer
|
02-18-2008, 11:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 16
Liked 62 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
Monroe, LA
Monroe is half an hour from my hometown of Ruston, LA. I've never seen a S&W shipped closer.
|
02-18-2008, 11:23 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
MP- Wow. That's interesting info. Thanks.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
02-18-2008, 02:26 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Jerry-thanks
Mike-thanks for confirming that the frames were all the same. Shall I look in the mail for a Call Gold bead front sight any time soon?
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
02-18-2008, 02:58 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,025
Likes: 9,001
Liked 48,772 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
A fantastic AND significant gun!
So, Bill, is that the FIRST "38 Outdoorsman"?
Should the NcGivern Model have really been called the "Sevier Model"????
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
02-18-2008, 03:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Lee,
Thank you. At first it was the only one until the Historian lettered another one that was in Apr 1930. I would say that there apparently were several of these before old Ed put his name on the 5" Outdoorsman!
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
02-18-2008, 03:33 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,525
Likes: 942
Liked 6,473 Times in 1,329 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Shall I look in the mail for a Call Gold bead front sight any time soon?
|
Bill
No, but I'll tell you what. If Gene won't fix it properly, have him take the
blade off, send it to me, and I will get it fixed correctly !
Regards, Mike Priwer
|
02-18-2008, 09:04 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OR
Posts: 3,517
Likes: 5,509
Liked 1,029 Times in 351 Posts
|
|
Bill, That is a stunningly beautiful old revolver! Congratulations and thanks for the showing, Jerry
|
11-13-2011, 08:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikepriwer
Bill
Do you know anything about the history of
that front sight blade ? Did Gene make that
up, or was it that way when you got the gun ?
I will post a question to Roy, asking what
is the difference between a 38/44 police target
model, and a 38/44 McGivern model .
Regards, Mike Priwer
|
Did this ever get answered?
Aaron
|
11-13-2011, 11:56 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
In my mind, yes it was answered. The 38/44 Police Target as Roy put it in the letter was a 5" adjustible site Heavy Duty. Mine has smooth front and rear straps. The other that Roy has lettered, has serrated front and rear straps. This would move it more toward the 38/44 Outdoorsman which had the serrated front and rear straps. As cataloged the 38/44 Outdoorsman was available in 6.5" barrel. Ed McGivern made the special order 5" Outdoorsman famous although other gun shops ordered them also. I would also have to feel that these early guns set the tone towards the development of the 38/44 Outdoorsman.
Hope this helps,
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
11-14-2011, 01:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 667
Liked 6,774 Times in 1,312 Posts
|
|
My heart skipped a beat.
__________________
Vaya con Dios
|
11-14-2011, 09:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Watkinsville, GA
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Liked 180 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Amazing revolver. I hope you can find out more about the lawman it was made for and shipped to. That would really make it a treasure
|
11-14-2011, 10:34 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,936
Liked 20,600 Times in 8,584 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Aspenhill
In my mind, yes it was answered. The 38/44 Police Target as Roy put it in the letter was a 5" adjustible site Heavy Duty. Mine has smooth front and rear straps. The other that Roy has lettered, has serrated front and rear straps. This would move it more toward the 38/44 Outdoorsman which had the serrated front and rear straps. As cataloged the 38/44 Outdoorsman was available in 6.5" barrel. Ed McGivern made the special order 5" Outdoorsman famous although other gun shops ordered them also. I would also have to feel that these early guns set the tone towards the development of the 38/44 Outdoorsman.
Hope this helps,
Bill
|
What a beautiful piece of S&W history! The earliest 26 Targets had smooth grip straps as well IIRC. What is the little circle on the yoke hinge?
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
11-16-2011, 10:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Isn't the circle where the "dent" for the Ourdoorsman and other early HE's is at?
Aaron
|
11-16-2011, 11:19 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,936
Liked 20,600 Times in 8,584 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ars1
Isn't the circle where the "dent" for the Ourdoorsman and other early HE's is at?
Aaron
|
Hi Aaron,
The little dent for the 'detent plunger' is actually on the frame side of the hinge and the plunger is in the yoke, just out of sight with cylinder closed.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 11-20-2011 at 05:05 AM.
|
11-16-2011, 11:49 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Thanks Jim,
You are absolutely correct!
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
11-17-2011, 10:59 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 2
Liked 3,456 Times in 988 Posts
|
|
Beautiful grips, those alone are worth the price of admission IMHO.
__________________
Jim
Many K and N Frames
|
11-17-2011, 11:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: slc utah
Posts: 139
Likes: 165
Liked 90 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
that sure is pretty!!! do you have any HD's that you take to the range?
|
11-17-2011, 12:27 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Yes I do.
bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
11-17-2011, 01:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baytown Texas
Posts: 876
Likes: 297
Liked 307 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
Beautiful gun Bill.
I did a little searching today and found a link that might give you a starting place in your search for R.M. Sevier.
I found his name listed as a S/Sgt and crew member on a B-24 bombing mission over France in 1944.
Look far down the page in the left column. He's listed under the crew for "15 Jun 1944 576th Sqdn. A/C 617". Maybe you can back-track from there; if this is your guy!
Congrats,
Craig
15 June 1944 -- Mission #110 -- Target: La Frilliere
|
11-17-2011, 02:39 PM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
Thanks Craig, I will follow up and see if it is the same guy.
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
11-17-2011, 04:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baytown Texas
Posts: 876
Likes: 297
Liked 307 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Aspenhill
Thanks Craig, I will follow up and see if it is the same guy.
Bill
|
Bill, I've been captivated by the accounts of some of the missions on the B24 site. R.M. Sevien is mentioned as a flight engineer on flights 110, 116,117, 119,121-123, 127, 129 and 130. There may be more but at least those.
In fact, he is mentioned by the pilot in an account detailed on Mission 130 where he had to repair fuel lines (in flight) that were damaged by AA fire.
If this is your guy, he saw some serious action in those B-24's. Since this happened about 14 years after he acquired your gun, it's possible he might have even carried it with him on those missions.
Craig...
|
11-17-2011, 10:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: slc utah
Posts: 139
Likes: 165
Liked 90 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
bill, if you get a chance could you show some pics would love to see em!!! you are the HEAVY DUTY KING!!!!!!!
|
11-19-2011, 11:47 AM
|
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
|
|
MOOSHOO,
What do you want to see?
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|