In the older Journal article (#24) by Roy Jinks, he references Registered Magnums bought for agent distribution by the FBI. Roy cites that the 3 1/2 and 4 inch versions were the favorite bbl lengths that were purchased by agents. Roy writes, "Finally, in July of 1937, the F.B.I. purchased 100 units for issue to its force. These revolvers, registration numbers 2666-2765, had 5 inch barrels, Baughman quick-draw sights, . . . . .".
Why do you think the 5 inch was selected for presumed concealed carry, over the more conventional shorter barrel length? (Guess that this answeres why the FBI Commerative was produced with the 5" barrel).

__________________
K Stone
FBINA 152

In the older Journal article (#24) by Roy Jinks, he references Registered Magnums bought for agent distribution by the FBI. Roy cites that the 3 1/2 and 4 inch versions were the favorite bbl lengths that were purchased by agents. Roy writes, "Finally, in July of 1937, the F.B.I. purchased 100 units for issue to its force. These revolvers, registration numbers 2666-2765, had 5 inch barrels, Baughman quick-draw sights, . . . . .".
Why do you think the 5 inch was selected for presumed concealed carry, over the more conventional shorter barrel length? (Guess that this answeres why the FBI Commerative was produced with the 5" barrel).

__________________
K Stone
FBINA 152

Have you seen how loose and long men's suit jackets were back then?

That is one possible reason. Another is that the firearms training staff may have liked the 5" gun better than the others. You'd be amazed how many times LE/Mil equipment choices are made by admin groups that will never have to use the gear in the real world.

I saw a five-inch example in the Bureau's gun vault in Dallas when I was there on a high school field trip.

Back then, Magnums were usually not issued for routine carry. They were passed out when a special risk needing added power was contemplated. Concealment may not have been a real issue. And the five-inch guns have a higher velocity and longer sight picture.

This is not to disagree with Wayne Dobbs, who seems to understand bureaucracy quite well.


T-Star

Any Agents (Present or Retired) who would like to add their thoughts? Comments so far seem logical, but it would be nice to have some inside knowledge.

__________________
K Stone
FBINA 152

This may be a little off the mark. I spent a great day with a retired Special Agent from the bad old days in Chicago. He had battle scars to show for it. He carried a Python (I think is was a 6")in a shoulder rig. His kids didn't shoot so he glommed unto me because I was facinated by his story and loved to shoot anything I got my hands on. We burned up a couple boxes at his backyard range. That Python was not exactly a CCW.