Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-20-2010, 11:09 AM
3rd Gen Neal's Avatar
3rd Gen Neal 3rd Gen Neal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Default Bbl-Cyl gap

I have heard so many different opinions on this, the barrel to cyl gap, I wanted to ask what you guys consider to be ideal and excessive. My 28-2 N prefix is about .0085. Is that excessive?? My 29-2 is more like .005. Then my 686-6+ basically doesn't have a gap!! I'm not looking for imaginary problems with my weapons just curious. And if a revolver is overly gapped what is the result/solution?? Thanks everybody.
__________________
Let go...Let Gun
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-20-2010, 11:19 AM
Nightowl's Avatar
Nightowl Nightowl is offline
SWCA Member
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warrensburg, MO USA
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,869
Liked 3,344 Times in 1,706 Posts
Default

Factory standard is about .004 to .010. About .006 is probably the most recommended. Unless you are having problems with .0085, it is not worth trying to correct to .006 or less. The fix is to remove the barrel and turn the shoulder back so it will make one more turn, then the extractor rod has to be shortened and refit. I once had my 627 set back to .004 and had it hang up, so I had to open it back up to .006. I would not worry about it, at this point.
__________________
Richard Gillespie
FBINA 102
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-20-2010, 11:21 AM
Gun 4 Fun Gun 4 Fun is offline
SWCA Member
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 1,061
Liked 774 Times in 375 Posts
Default

S&W specs used to be .004" - .010" as being within tolerance, but I have read not too long ago that it is now .004" -.012".
Most S&W's when actually measured will run in the neighborhood of .005"-.007", and will seldom be uniform all the way around the cylinder.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-20-2010, 12:18 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,563
Liked 22,433 Times in 8,279 Posts
Default

I have a 17-4 that has from .001 to .002. I have not had any dragging problems, but do not shoot it extensively.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-20-2010, 12:52 PM
Gun 4 Fun Gun 4 Fun is offline
SWCA Member
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 1,061
Liked 774 Times in 375 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H Richard View Post
I have a 17-4 that has from .001 to .002. I have not had any dragging problems, but do not shoot it extensively.
I have a 629 P&R that has .0015", and I haven't had any trouble yet either, though I thought I might. My F/A 83 will barely allow a .001" feeler gauge through, and I use top end cast loads all the time with no problems either.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-20-2010, 04:02 PM
dant's Avatar
dant dant is offline
Member
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 26
Liked 451 Times in 233 Posts
Default

yes, close is better, until it actually rubs, and if you get ANY fouling ( lead build up) it can and will 'rub', if they get that close....we try and keep it around .004-.006"
__________________
dan
NRA Benefactor,PMA
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-20-2010, 10:48 PM
jvmm jvmm is offline
Member
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 2
Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Default

I just put a NEW barrel on my Mod 14 and measured the cylinder/barrel gap at .016!!!

Should.s I take it to the range for testing or get the lathe ready?? thanks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-20-2010, 10:50 PM
jvmm jvmm is offline
Member
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 2
Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Default cylinder/barrel gap??

I just put a NEW barrel on my model 14 and checked the gap...it is .016!!!

Should I go to the range for testing ot get ready to turn the lathe on? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-20-2010, 11:09 PM
Gun 4 Fun Gun 4 Fun is offline
SWCA Member
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 1,061
Liked 774 Times in 375 Posts
Default

A gap that large will usually cause spitting, and is not a good thing. I would tighten that up if at all possible. You will also lose some velocity from a gap that large.

In fairness, I need to mention that I have a very old S&W that has a .017" gap, and it doesn't spit. The fact that the chambers line up nicely with the bore when locked up is the biggest reason why, but I would still prefer it to be under .008".
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-20-2010, 11:53 PM
jvmm jvmm is offline
Member
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 2
Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Default

It's off to the range, I guess will give an AAR. Willbe using cast 148 WC with Bull.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-21-2010, 10:31 AM
bgrafsr's Avatar
bgrafsr bgrafsr is offline
US Veteran
Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap Bbl-Cyl gap  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Homerville, Ohio
Posts: 5,407
Likes: 28,681
Liked 9,263 Times in 2,384 Posts
Default

.016" is way to big of a gap. I would have the barrel shoulder turned back one complete turn, or at least enough to have the barrel draw up tight to the frame, and then use the lathe to cut the end of the barrel back so it stays square and you get a good gap of .003" to 004". If only turning the shoulder back one turn, you may not even have to shorten the extractor rod.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
627, 629, 686, extractor, fouling, model 14


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)