Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 08-19-2022, 03:59 PM
Camster Camster is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 993
Liked 1,923 Times in 956 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowman View Post
I have a 4" 63-3; a wonderful gun. Generally they aren't considered as accurate as the K22s, but I sometimes wonder if that can't be attributed at least partially to the fact that small guns are just more difficult to shoot accurately.

Mine has a great trigger in both SA and DA. I bought target grips for mine and that helps a great deal, since the magnas they come with are tiny and add to the difficulty mentioned above.

They are good guns to teach others to shoot with, particularly ladies and children; i.e. people with smail hands. I use mine to review fundamentals of defensive shooting; it is like shooting my carry gun, which is also small. After a session with the 63, I practice again with the carry gun.

Hope some of this is helpful to you.
Andy
Just bought the same version. Just added SB targets to it.(63-3 is a RB gun) I agree with all that you said.
I like a K frame better, superior trigger and better size for my paws( owned lots in the past, also owned 34s and a 63) but this time, the smaller size was important.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-23-2022, 12:59 AM
RubEric RubEric is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 237
Likes: 5
Liked 873 Times in 170 Posts
Default

My model 63. Paid $1k
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #53  
Old 08-28-2022, 05:20 PM
S.B.'s Avatar
S.B. S.B. is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 49
Liked 721 Times in 369 Posts
Default

I've shown this before I had trouble seeing the front sight so had Clements change it out for me

Steve
__________________
NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #54  
Old 06-23-2023, 10:44 AM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,386
Likes: 18,093
Liked 24,293 Times in 6,874 Posts
Default

I just picked up my first 63 last weekend at the Vegas show. I have several K frame 22s and a 650, but this is my 63. Been looking for a 2" for a long time and was happy to find one under $1K. Traded some Contender barrels for it. Sure is fun to shoot!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 632.jpg (109.5 KB, 44 views)
File Type: jpg 631.jpg (87.9 KB, 48 views)
__________________
213th FBINA
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #55  
Old 06-23-2023, 01:05 PM
ruger 22 ruger 22 is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 810
Likes: 1,635
Liked 1,100 Times in 489 Posts
Default

I bought a 4" for my son for his 14th birthday in 1981. We put Herretts Shooting Stars on it almost immediately and he still has it today. Says this is the last to go in his collection. It is a great gun.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #56  
Old 11-03-2023, 08:26 PM
gr8smiles's Avatar
gr8smiles gr8smiles is offline
SWCA Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tn
Posts: 569
Likes: 41
Liked 283 Times in 47 Posts
Default Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?

Looking back over some threads, I’ll resurrect this one with a couple pics of my 2” Model 63s…

__________________
Rick
SWCA #2396

Last edited by gr8smiles; 11-03-2023 at 09:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
  #57  
Old 11-11-2023, 10:21 PM
DRYHEAT's Avatar
DRYHEAT DRYHEAT is offline
SWCA Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1,918
Liked 5,680 Times in 675 Posts
Default

The factory checkered Targets are my personal favorites
__________________
Bill - SWCA #2327
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #58  
Old 11-12-2023, 10:45 AM
raljr1 raljr1 is offline
SWCA Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast FL
Posts: 5,807
Likes: 7,464
Liked 15,231 Times in 3,633 Posts
Default

Bought mine new in 1980, paid $260 for it new. With large hands, target acquisition was difficult using the original grips. Factory targets solved that problem. I have a couple of k22s, but for a stroll thru the woods and for assassinating tin cans, a Model 63 can't be beat.

Robert
__________________
Robert
SWCA #2906, SWHF #760

Last edited by raljr1; 11-12-2023 at 10:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #59  
Old 11-12-2023, 01:06 PM
press-1-for-english's Avatar
press-1-for-english press-1-for-english is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 364
Likes: 267
Liked 543 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Here's the one I bought "used" August of this year for eight and change. All I did to it was fire it. Left it stock. Came with the box, sealed tools, and paperwork. Dandy little plinker.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg J9XC6Ul.jpg (268.5 KB, 31 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #60  
Old 11-13-2023, 08:33 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,935
Liked 20,600 Times in 8,584 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint Ridge View Post
What is the function of the second pin under the rear sight?
.22/32 Kit Gun and Target Firing pin changes

I could not find this info anywhere so have studied the .22/32 models. The one pin or two pins coincide with two styles of firing pins, round and rectangular respectively at the breech face. With the rectangular style there can be two proud pins, or front pin proud and rear pin flush from the factory.

ROUND FIRING PIN with one retaining pin:
The front single pin retains the firing pin bushing in the recoil shield and the firing pin is a round style including a fully round front striking tip. Used on the Pre war 22/32 Heavy Frame Target, ('30s vintage 22/32 Heavy Target ), 22/32 Kit Guns, and post war transitional Target and Kit Guns. This configuration returned later c. #70000, Oct. 1960 with the J frame introduction; Models 34-1 and 35-1.

RECTANGULAR FRONT TIP, FLATTENED TOP REAR FIRING PIN with two retaining pins:
The Model of 1953 New I frame is the first post war model change for the 22/32 models and introduced a new rectangular shaped firing pin tip with two proud retaining pins at first, front for bushing and rear for firing pin.

This rectangular front striking tip style firing pin can be seen with hammer cocked by looking in the hammer channel from the rear at the top of the firing pin. This rear 2nd pin crosses over the flattened rear top of, and retains the firing pin.

The rectangular firing pin with proud front pin and flush rear pin was used beginning c. #21000 (late '55 to early '56) thru c. # 29000, after which time the two proud pins returned. I have observed that the 'bright' blue finish began on the .22/32 in its serial # range in the early to mid 21,000s (1956) and seems to coincide with the flat polishing of the rear retaining pin.

RETURN OF THE ROUND FIRING PIN:
The Pre-1953 round tipped firing pin w/one proud front retaining pin, was reintroduced c. #70000 Oct. 1960 with the 22/32 J frame introduction of the Models 34-1 and 35-1.

7/22/17 -
In stock at Brownells here: Keyword Search | Brownells


2 pin with rear pin flush c. #21000 (late '55 to early '56) to c. #29000 (’57 – ’58).

2" #26821 shipped 7/57:


RETURN OF THE ROUND FIRING PIN with one pin:
The rectangular/rear flattened top firing pin was subsequently dropped in an engineering change that re-used the fully round firing pin of the pre war guns and the post war transitional guns with one pin (proud) on the sides of the frame. I have not been able to pinpoint when the change was made and of course like every other S&W change it was a transitional event. However, I have a sense that the return to one single pin (proud) with fully round firing pin coincides approximately with the change from the I frame Mod 34 to the J frame Mod 34 identified with a "-1" in Oct 1960, c. #70000. I have not observed any J frame 22/32 kit guns with two pins, proud or otherwise.

BEWARE OF REFINISHED GUNS one proud & one flush pin or both flush:
Refinished Mod 1953 22/32s originally having two proud pins will often be encountered with the forward pin proud and the smaller rear pin or both pins polished flush. However, the 2nd pin flush can be an original factory variation and will be observed on a non-refinished gun as stated above.

NOT DOCUMENTED ANYWHERE:
This round/rectangular firing pin and 1 pin/2 pin issue will not be found anywhere in the Jink's or SCSW books.

I hope this helps and as usual I am always open to further evidence in the unending pursuit of complete knowledge of S&W firearms.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819

Last edited by Hondo44; 11-13-2023 at 10:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #61  
Old 11-14-2023, 01:19 AM
Mike, SC Hunter Mike, SC Hunter is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,921
Likes: 14,075
Liked 13,775 Times in 4,993 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog View Post
These are factory universal fit (both square and round butt) Target stocks, which were available in both smooth and checkered versions. They were sold as replacement stocks only as far as I have seen.
All Factory grips. Blue 4 In 34--Nickel 4 in 34--4 in 63
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 100_1227.jpg (158.3 KB, 31 views)
__________________
S&W Accumulator
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #62  
Old 11-14-2023, 07:48 AM
snowman snowman is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Rural NW Ohio
Posts: 3,387
Likes: 5,180
Liked 2,444 Times in 1,097 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44 View Post
.22/32 Kit Gun and Target Firing pin changes


I hope this helps and as usual I am always open to further evidence in the unending pursuit of complete knowledge of S&W firearms.
Hondo44: It appears to me that your knowledge of this issue is as close to complete as anyone will get!

With respect,
Andy
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 11-14-2023, 12:44 PM
BlackAgnes's Avatar
BlackAgnes BlackAgnes is offline
US Veteran
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 4
Liked 3,812 Times in 459 Posts
Default

Here's mine with Keith Brown Ropers, scaled to fit the J Frame.

Tim
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #64  
Old 11-14-2023, 02:17 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,935
Liked 20,600 Times in 8,584 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raljr1 View Post
Bought mine new in 1980, paid $260 for it new. With large hands, target acquisition was difficult using the original grips. Factory targets solved that problem. I have a couple of k22s, but for a stroll thru the woods and for assassinating tin cans, a Model 63 can't be beat.

Robert
That’s a nice early pair with the fuller tops that are as high as the knuckle on the back strap like K and N frame target grips!
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #65  
Old 11-15-2023, 09:26 AM
CAJUNLAWYER's Avatar
CAJUNLAWYER CAJUNLAWYER is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On da Bayou Teche
Posts: 18,471
Likes: 18,598
Liked 58,988 Times in 9,683 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRYHEAT View Post
Go for a 4" 63. Could be $600+ cheaper (than the 1947 K-22 I want!).

63 no dash, shipped April '81 (30th Birthday!) Presentation (target sized) Stocks. P&R Found at a local Scottsdale gun store for $419 O.T.D. in January '11. It can be done.
That gun is a twin of mine. The target grips make all the difference in the world as far as shootability. Mine are checkered
__________________
Forum consigliere
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #66  
Old 11-15-2023, 02:31 PM
DRYHEAT's Avatar
DRYHEAT DRYHEAT is offline
SWCA Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1,918
Liked 5,680 Times in 675 Posts
Default

My wife likes the original stocks better than my favorite targets
__________________
Bill - SWCA #2327
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #67  
Old 12-13-2023, 11:06 AM
CAJUNLAWYER's Avatar
CAJUNLAWYER CAJUNLAWYER is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On da Bayou Teche
Posts: 18,471
Likes: 18,598
Liked 58,988 Times in 9,683 Posts
Default

Yes. Need to type something to get to 10 characters, but the answer is yes.
__________________
Forum consigliere
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 12-13-2023, 11:17 AM
jaguargolf jaguargolf is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 75 miles NW of NYC
Posts: 226
Likes: 1,141
Liked 416 Times in 138 Posts
Default

I'll have to figure out how to post a picture.

I have a 63 with a 5" barrel.

It also is an 8 shot pistol
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 12-13-2023, 07:49 PM
dingomann dingomann is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 93
Likes: 1,397
Liked 103 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Some really nice M63s here. I bought mine about 40 years ago for around $225-$250, I don't recall exactly. It is pinned, SN is 167500. That is an easy one to remember! I have fired approx. 35,000 rounds through it. For about 10 years I did a lot of aerial target shooting and that really burns up the ammo. I cleaned it whenever the action started to get sticky, which might be 50 rounds or it might be 400 rounds. Some ammo is a lot dirtier than others. I have timed it once. The cylinder stop fractured so I used one that came from a junk Llama Comanche .38. Works fine. It still wears the original small grips which show a lot of wear but I like them. The DA pull has a distinct pause where you you can hold it just shy of let-off, get a good sight picture, then fire it just like a single action. Few of my other guns have a pause like it. It is still accurate but my eyes are just not good enough to utilize that accuracy anymore. I have enjoyed owning this gun and I hope the next owner does, too.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #70  
Old 12-13-2023, 07:54 PM
THE PILGRIM's Avatar
THE PILGRIM THE PILGRIM is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Posts: 13,900
Likes: 8,103
Liked 25,433 Times in 8,552 Posts
Default

I have a 2 and a 4.
Can’t find a pic of the 4.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3223.jpg (92.6 KB, 9 views)
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #71  
Old 12-13-2023, 11:05 PM
reccpd101's Avatar
reccpd101 reccpd101 is offline
SWCA Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 783
Likes: 1,113
Liked 1,087 Times in 426 Posts
Default

THERE'S not a better new shooter, woods walking, or trainer for a J frame then a 63 even better if you fit a 22 mag cylinder to go with it. How do I know 10,000 plus rounds don't lie. I also have a model 18 I used learning how to really shoot a K frame.
__________________
SWCA 3417 HF 642 NRA-TC
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 12-15-2023, 08:38 AM
press-1-for-english's Avatar
press-1-for-english press-1-for-english is offline
Member
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 364
Likes: 267
Liked 543 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by press-1-for-english View Post
Here's the one I bought "used" August of this year for eight and change. All I did to it was fire it. Left it stock. Came with the box, sealed tools, and paperwork. Dandy little plinker.
Here's what it looks like presently.
Very comfortable stocks/grips.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20231120_134759095.jpg (148.9 KB, 7 views)
__________________
RIP Chloe 2007-2023
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 12-15-2023, 01:30 PM
hkcavalier's Avatar
hkcavalier hkcavalier is offline
US Veteran
Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22? Was the Model 63, the first S&W stainless .22?  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,313 Times in 1,905 Posts
Default

I only have an imposter 63.



__________________
Psalm 27:2
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
k-22, k22, model 16, model 63, presentation, recessed, rimfire, s&w


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stainless Security Six with Stainless Python barrel? MP1518 Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 21 03-18-2017 06:41 AM
#SOLD#S&W model 19-5; S&W model 66 no dash stainless front and rear creekrock GUNS - For Sale or Trade 1 08-16-2016 08:01 PM
REDUCED PRICE Colt officers model mkiv .45 stainless enhanced model 80 series Steveyb GUNS - For Sale or Trade 5 06-11-2016 02:36 PM
WTT Your Stainless Colt Python for 2 LNIB Sig P226's - MK25 AND Elite Stainless Kraaaken GUNS - For Sale or Trade 1 05-04-2014 04:34 PM
WTB looking for a lnib or nib colt python 2 1/2" stainless or bright stainless. threecharley WANTED to Buy 2 06-30-2012 02:41 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)